JAN
Price
$30.18
Change
-$0.29 (-0.95%)
Updated
Aug 10 closing price
Capitalization
6.52B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WM
Price
$226.60
Change
-$1.08 (-0.47%)
Updated
Aug 10 closing price
Capitalization
90.58B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JAN vs WM

JAN vs WM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JAN vs. WM commentary
Aug 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JAN is a Hold and WM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2026
Stock price -- (JAN: $30.18 vs. WM: $226.60)
Brand notoriety: JAN and WM are both not notable
JAN represents the Media Conglomerates, while WM is part of the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JAN: 77% vs. WM: 67%
Market capitalization -- JAN: $6.52B vs. WM: $90.58B
JAN [@Media Conglomerates] is valued at $6.52B. WM’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $90.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $26.25B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $90.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $9.18B. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $11.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JAN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JAN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WM is a better buy in the long-term than JAN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

JAN (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +2.13% price change this week, while WM (@Environmental Services) price change was +0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.79%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +6.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

JAN is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

WM is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Media Conglomerates (-1.04% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

@Environmental Services (+6.21% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WM($90.6B) has a higher market cap than JAN($6.52B). WM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.46B vs. JAN (260M). WM has higher revenues than JAN: WM (25.7B) vs JAN (823M).
JANWMJAN / WM
Capitalization6.52B90.6B7%
EBITDA260M7.46B3%
Gain YTDN/A3.995-
P/E RatioN/A59.67-
Revenue823M25.7B3%
Total CashN/A557M-
Total DebtN/A23.4B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JAN vs WM: Fundamental Ratings
JAN
WM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9262
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2020
SMR RATING
1..100
9334
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
112
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2955

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WM's Valuation (39) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JAN (79) in the null industry. This means that WM’s stock grew somewhat faster than JAN’s over the last 12 months.

WM's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as JAN (20) in the null industry. This means that WM’s stock grew similarly to JAN’s over the last 12 months.

WM's SMR Rating (34) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JAN (93) in the null industry. This means that WM’s stock grew somewhat faster than JAN’s over the last 12 months.

JAN's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as WM (55) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that JAN’s stock grew similarly to WM’s over the last 12 months.

JAN's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as WM (12) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that JAN’s stock grew similarly to WM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSTCX67.65N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Telecommunications Port
LMPSX36.65N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth FI
FIKGX196.96N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Z
ELMCX25.39N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Equity C
BSCMX24.84-0.31
-1.23%
Brandes Small Cap Value I

JAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JAN and ONT have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JAN and ONT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JAN
1D Price
Change %
JAN100%
-0.95%
ONT - JAN
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.88%
WM - JAN
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
RSG - JAN
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
CLH - JAN
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
OIO - JAN
7%
Poorly correlated
-10.33%
More

WM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WM has been closely correlated with RSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WM jumps, then RSG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WM
1D Price
Change %
WM100%
-0.47%
RSG - WM
80%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
WCN - WM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
GFL - WM
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
CLH - WM
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
JAN - WM
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
More