KHC
Price
$22.03
Change
+$0.19 (+0.87%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
27.94B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MDLZ
Price
$59.62
Change
+$1.13 (+1.93%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
76.81B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KHC vs MDLZ

KHC vs MDLZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 05, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) vs. Mondelēz International (MDLZ) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • KHC is a broad packaged-food and beverage maker, while MDLZ is a global snacking leader, giving the two very different growth profiles despite both being consumer staples.
  • Both companies have posted declining adjusted earnings per share (EPS) recently, driven by input-cost inflation and weaker volumes, but MDLZ has maintained positive organic revenue growth while KHC has contracted.
  • KHC has paused a planned business separation and is reinvesting roughly $600 million to revive its core brands, signaling a strategy reset.
  • MDLZ faces persistent cocoa-cost headwinds but has leaned on pricing, emerging-market strength, and disciplined capital returns.
  • On relative momentum and trend consistency, MDLZ has recently outperformed KHC, though KHC offers a notably higher dividend yield.

Introduction

Investors comparing KHC (The Kraft Heinz Company) and MDLZ (Mondelēz International) are weighing two well-known consumer staples businesses with sharply different market positioning. One is a diversified pantry, condiments, and meals company navigating a turnaround; the other is a global snacking powerhouse contending with unprecedented cocoa costs. This stock comparison is most relevant to traders and investors seeking defensive, dividend-paying names, as well as those watching how inflation, volume trends, and strategic pivots shape relative performance in the food sector.

KHC Overview and Recent Performance

KHC manufactures and markets a broad portfolio spanning sauces and condiments, frozen meals, meats, cheese, and beverages, with roughly two-thirds of sales tied to the United States. In recent market activity, the shares have traded near the lower end of their 52-week range and have declined on a year-over-year basis, pressured by persistent volume declines and soft North American demand.

The company's most recent fiscal-year results showed net sales down about 3.5% to approximately $24.9 billion and adjusted EPS down roughly 15%, reflecting commodity and manufacturing cost inflation, unfavorable volume/mix, and higher brand spending. Management has paused its previously announced plan to separate the business and, under new leadership, committed to an incremental investment program to modernize brands and rebuild organic growth. Non-cash impairment charges have also weighed on reported earnings. The stock's elevated dividend yield—around 7%—reflects both its capital-return focus and the market's caution about its growth outlook.

MDLZ Overview and Recent Performance

MDLZ is a global snacking leader whose portfolio includes chocolate, biscuits, and baked snacks, with 2025 net revenues of roughly $38.5 billion across more than 150 countries. Recent quarterly results showed net revenues up about 9% and organic net revenue up about 5%, driven primarily by pricing, while volume/mix declined as consumers responded to higher prices.

The dominant headwind has been cocoa cost inflation, which compressed gross and adjusted operating margins despite favorable pricing and productivity gains. Full-year adjusted EPS declined on a constant-currency basis, though fourth-quarter adjusted EPS rose modestly. The company has emphasized emerging-market momentum, brand investment, and structural cost savings, while returning roughly $4.9 billion to shareholders through dividends and buybacks. Shares have outperformed the broader packaged-food industry in recent months, reflecting comparatively stronger top-line resilience.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a large ecosystem of AI-powered trading tools, including hundreds of AI Trading Bots that actively scan and trade thousands of different tickers across varying strategies and timeframes. Because not every bot fits every market regime, Tickeron curates only the most relevant performers into its Trending AI Robots section. These bots differ in trading style, holding period, risk profile, and the sets of tickers they follow, with performance metrics and statistics updated to reflect current conditions. For investors evaluating names such as KHC and MDLZ, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can offer a data-driven perspective on which strategies are currently gaining traction.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The clearest contrast between these two stocks is strategic focus. MDLZ is concentrated in high-margin snacking categories with significant international and emerging-market exposure, while KHC operates a more diversified, U.S.-centric grocery and condiments business that is more exposed to private-label competition and shifting consumer habits.

On growth, MDLZ has sustained positive organic revenue growth largely through pricing, even as cocoa inflation squeezes profitability. KHC, by contrast, has seen organic sales contract as volumes fall, prompting its strategy reset and brand reinvestment. In terms of risk, MDLZ carries meaningful commodity exposure to cocoa, while KHC faces execution risk around its turnaround and the durability of its dividend. Sentiment has favored MDLZ, which has posted stronger recent relative performance, whereas KHC trades at a lower valuation multiple with a much higher yield.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, top-line resilience, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor MDLZ over KHC in the current environment. MDLZ has demonstrated steadier organic revenue growth, stronger recent momentum, and greater exposure to faster-growing emerging markets, even as cocoa costs pressure near-term margins. KHC carries a higher dividend and a lower valuation, which may appeal to income-oriented strategies, but its persistent volume declines and ongoing strategic reset introduce greater uncertainty. This assessment reflects probabilistic, data-driven analysis rather than a definitive prediction or personal investment recommendation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
KHC vs. MDLZ commentary
Oct 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KHC is a Hold and MDLZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KHC vs MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
KHC
MDLZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6964
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10079
SMR RATING
1..100
9360
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5142
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KHC's Valuation (5) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as MDLZ (22). This means that KHC’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as KHC (100). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to KHC’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's SMR Rating (60) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KHC (93). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than KHC’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as KHC (61). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to KHC’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as KHC (51). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to KHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KHCMDLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2026
Stock price -- (KHC: $22.03 vs. MDLZ: $59.62)
Brand notoriety: KHC and MDLZ are both notable
KHC represents the Food: Major Diversified, while MDLZ is part of the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KHC: 147% vs. MDLZ: 102%
Market capitalization -- KHC: $27.94B vs. MDLZ: $76.81B
KHC [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $27.94B. MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $76.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $68.81K to $239.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $89 to $76.81B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $2.9B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $22.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MDLZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the long-term than KHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KHC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the short-term than KHC.

Price Growth

KHC (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -6.06% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +1.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -2.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.83%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +3.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -30.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

KHC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-2.70% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+3.66% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

View a ticker or compare two or three
KHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MDLZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDC1.360.04
+3.03%
GD Culture Group Limited
GRND13.940.40
+2.95%
Grindr
ANIX3.020.07
+2.37%
Anixa Biosciences
BWB20.37-0.06
-0.29%
Bridgewater Bancshares
GIB69.60-1.46
-2.05%
CGI

KHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KHC has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KHC jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KHC
1D Price
Change %
KHC100%
+0.87%
GIS - KHC
70%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
CAG - KHC
69%
Closely correlated
+1.97%
CPB - KHC
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
HSY - KHC
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
MDLZ - KHC
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
+1.93%
GIS - MDLZ
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
CAG - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.97%
CPB - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
KHC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
MKC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
More