KNTNF
Price
$6.67
Change
+$0.04 (+0.60%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
55 days until earnings call
PAAS
Price
$24.18
Change
+$0.07 (+0.29%)
Updated
Jan 31, 10:33 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.59B
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

KNTNF vs PAAS

Header iconKNTNF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts KNTNF vs PAASBanner chart's image
K92 Mining
Price$6.67
Change+$0.04 (+0.60%)
Volume$264.77K
Capitalization1.1B
Pan American Silver
Price$24.18
Change+$0.07 (+0.29%)
Volume$7.29K
Capitalization5.59B
KNTNF vs PAAS Comparison Chart
Loading...
KNTNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KNTNF vs. PAAS commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KNTNF is a Hold and PAAS is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (KNTNF: $6.68 vs. PAAS: $24.11)
Brand notoriety: KNTNF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KNTNF: 192% vs. PAAS: 165%
Market capitalization -- KNTNF: $1.1B vs. PAAS: $5.59B
KNTNF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.1B. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KNTNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KNTNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KNTNF and PAAS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KNTNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KNTNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the short-term than KNTNF.

Price Growth

KNTNF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.38% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

KNTNF is expected to report earnings on May 19, 2025.

PAAS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.95% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($5.59B) has a higher market cap than KNTNF($1.1B). PAAS YTD gains are higher at: 19.238 vs. KNTNF (10.862). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. KNTNF (71.6M). PAAS has higher revenues than KNTNF: PAAS (2.02B) vs KNTNF (176M).
KNTNFPAASKNTNF / PAAS
Capitalization1.1B5.59B20%
EBITDA71.6M296M24%
Gain YTD10.86219.23856%
P/E Ratio41.49N/A-
Revenue176M2.02B9%
Total Cash88.6MN/A-
Total Debt8.82MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KNTNF vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
KNTNF
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7019
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3682
SMR RATING
1..100
4690
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9244
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (14) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for KNTNF (85) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew significantly faster than KNTNF’s over the last 12 months.

KNTNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAAS (82) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that KNTNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

KNTNF's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAAS (90) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that KNTNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

KNTNF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (42) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that KNTNF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KNTNF (92) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than KNTNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KNTNFPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
79%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KNTNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WKEY7.570.34
+4.70%
WISeKey International Holding Ltd
CTXAY36.370.83
+2.34%
Ampol Ltd.
ALFVY44.880.55
+1.24%
Alfa-Laval AB
UCBJY98.76-0.40
-0.41%
UCB S.A.
WMLLF0.06N/A
-0.97%
Wealth Minerals Ltd.

KNTNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KNTNF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KNTNF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KNTNF
1D Price
Change %
KNTNF100%
+0.53%
AEM - KNTNF
66%
Closely correlated
+4.83%
SAND - KNTNF
66%
Closely correlated
+3.12%
MAG - KNTNF
65%
Loosely correlated
+6.75%
KGC - KNTNF
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.33%
PAAS - KNTNF
64%
Loosely correlated
+6.78%
More