In the volatile precious metals sector, IAG and PAAS stand out as key players riding elevated gold and silver prices. This comparison examines their business models, recent market performance, and relative positioning amid broader commodity trends. Gold miners like IAMGOLD have benefited from record bullion levels near $4,800 per ounce, while diversified producers like Pan American Silver gain from silver's industrial demand. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing sector exposure will find value in understanding their contrasts in scale, asset bases, and risk profiles during recent market activity.
IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is a mid-tier gold producer and developer operating primarily in Canada and Burkina Faso, with its flagship Côté Gold project in Ontario driving growth. The company explores and extracts gold, supported by recent strong financials including $2.85 billion in trailing twelve-month (TTM) revenue and $1.5 billion in EBITDA. In recent weeks, IAG shares have traded around $16.59, within a 52-week range of $6.06 to $24.87, reflecting YTD gains of about 1% and robust one-year returns over 144%. Sentiment has been influenced by positive analyst coverage, an upgraded Moody's rating, and anticipation for Q1 2026 earnings on May 5, alongside its 2025 sustainability report highlighting ESG (environmental, social, and governance) progress. Pullbacks stem from profit-taking after earlier peaks, tempered by operational updates on Côté ramp-up.
Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) is a leading silver and gold producer with operations across Latin America and Canada, including key assets like La Colorada and Jacobina mines. It reported TTM revenue of $3.62 billion and EBITDA of $1.79 billion, underscoring its scale. Shares recently closed near $51.81, in a 52-week range of $22.08 to $69.99, with YTD returns around 1.4% and one-year gains surpassing 117%. Recent market activity shows sharper weekly declines amid silver price fluctuations, but positive catalysts include Scotiabank's raised price target to $65, strong annual meeting outcomes, and Q1 2026 earnings due May 5. Investor focus remains on production growth from skarn deposits and diversified metal exposure amid economic uncertainty.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots selected from over 350 agents that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. These curated performers adapt to current market conditions, delivering impressive stats like annualized returns up to 163%, win rates exceeding 80% in some cases, and profit factors over 7. Precious metals bots, relevant for IAG and PAAS, show +76% annualized returns on energy and metals portfolios with 57% win rates. Ranging from short-term scalps to longer holds, they employ risk-managed corridors for outperformance. Explore these bots to enhance your trading edge in today's dynamic markets.
IAG emphasizes pure-play gold production with growth from Côté, contrasting PAAS's balanced silver-gold model across multiple jurisdictions, reducing single-asset risk. Growth drivers for IAG include project ramp-ups amid high gold prices, while PAAS leverages silver's dual industrial-precious role and recent discoveries like La Colorada skarn. Recent momentum favors neither decisively, with both showing balanced technical signals but PAAS exhibiting higher volatility. Risk factors involve geopolitical exposure for IAG in Burkina Faso versus PAAS's operational diversity. Market sentiment tilts toward PAAS for its $1.32 billion cash pile versus IAG's $423 million, aiding resilience.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward PAAS with moderate confidence, citing its undervalued rating (17 vs. IAG's 74), superior revenue scale, and stronger cash position for navigating volatility. While IAG offers a compelling lower P/E and FA score edge for long-term gold bets, PAAS's diversification and profit-risk metrics position it better for relative stability amid upcoming earnings and sector trends.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IAG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IAG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
IAG (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.98% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.20%.
IAG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| IAG | PAAS | IAG / PAAS | |
| Capitalization | 9.61B | 20.3B | 47% |
| EBITDA | 1.96B | 2.22B | 89% |
| Gain YTD | 0.970 | -6.535 | -15% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.74 | 15.19 | 64% |
| Revenue | 3.41B | 4B | 85% |
| Total Cash | 551M | 1.61B | 34% |
| Total Debt | 651M | 845M | 77% |
IAG | PAAS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 11 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAAS's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IAG (57). This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than IAG’s over the last 12 months.
IAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (59). This means that IAG’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
IAG's SMR Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (45). This means that IAG’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
IAG's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (61). This means that IAG’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
IAG's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for PAAS (95). This means that IAG’s stock grew significantly faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
| IAG | PAAS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 65% |