Advertisement
LEDS vs MCHP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEDS is a Buy and MCHP is a Buy.
| LEDS | MCHP | LEDS / MCHP | |
| Capitalization | 19.3M | 39.8B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -229K | 1.46B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 56.667 | 19.355 | 293% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 107.75 | - |
| Revenue | 25.9M | 5.12B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 5.98M | 272M | 2% |
| Total Debt | 2.35M | 5.4B | 0% |
LEDS | MCHP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 89 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LEDS's Valuation (24) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHP (70) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that LEDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHP’s over the last 12 months.
MCHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as LEDS (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that MCHP’s stock grew similarly to LEDS’s over the last 12 months.
MCHP's SMR Rating (82) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as LEDS (97) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that MCHP’s stock grew similarly to LEDS’s over the last 12 months.
LEDS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as MCHP (58) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that LEDS’s stock grew similarly to MCHP’s over the last 12 months.
MCHP's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as LEDS (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that MCHP’s stock grew similarly to LEDS’s over the last 12 months.
| LEDS | MCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 13 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LEDS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MCHP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LEDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MCHP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LEDS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LEDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MCHP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LEDS (@Semiconductors) experienced а +6.82% price change this week, while MCHP (@Semiconductors) price change was +4.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +10.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
MCHP is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (+10.74% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
Advertisement
LEDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEDS has been loosely correlated with MPWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LEDS jumps, then MPWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEDS | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| MPWR - LEDS | 38% Loosely correlated | +4.92% | ||
| SYNA - LEDS | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.42% | ||
| RMBS - LEDS | 34% Loosely correlated | +10.68% | ||
| MCHP - LEDS | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.06% | ||
| MCHPP - LEDS | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.79% | ||
More | ||||
MCHP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHP has been closely correlated with MCHPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 98% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCHP jumps, then MCHPP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHP | 100% | +2.06% | ||
| MCHPP - MCHP | 98% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| TXN - MCHP | 81% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| ADI - MCHP | 81% Closely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| NXPI - MCHP | 79% Closely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| ON - MCHP | 77% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
More | ||||