Advertisement
RL vs WWW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ralph Lauren (RL) vs. Wolverine World Wide (WWW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Ralph Lauren (RL) has delivered mixed recent performance, with shares declining amid broader luxury sector pressures and trading below analyst price targets.
- Wolverine World Wide (WWW) reported stronger year-to-date gains, supported by solid first-quarter revenue growth and an earnings beat.
- RL operates in the premium apparel and lifestyle segment with a focus on brand heritage and global expansion, while WWW focuses on performance footwear and apparel with a diversified brand portfolio.
- Market sentiment for RL reflects caution ahead of its fiscal fourth-quarter earnings report, whereas WWW benefits from positive momentum following its recent quarterly results.
- Relative performance shows WWW outperforming the broader market year-to-date, contrasting with RL's underperformance over the same period.
- Both stocks face consumer spending headwinds but differ in growth drivers, with RL emphasizing luxury positioning and WWW highlighting operational efficiency.
Introduction
This comparison examines Ralph Lauren (RL) and Wolverine World Wide (WWW), two apparel and footwear companies navigating evolving consumer trends in the current market environment. Investors and traders seeking exposure to the consumer discretionary sector may find this analysis relevant, particularly those evaluating relative performance, business model resilience, and positioning amid shifting economic conditions. The review draws on observable market data and recent corporate developments to highlight contrasts in momentum and risk profiles.
RL Overview and Recent Performance
Ralph Lauren Corporation designs, markets, and distributes premium lifestyle products under the Ralph Lauren brand. In recent weeks, the stock has experienced downward pressure, with shares trading approximately 27% below consensus analyst targets and posting an 11.5% decline over the past month. Year-to-date returns stand at roughly -7.3%, underperforming the S&P 500. Broader market activity has been influenced by mixed sentiment around luxury spending and upcoming fiscal fourth-quarter earnings scheduled for May 21, with consensus estimates projecting revenue of about $1.85 billion. Recent collaborations, such as with the U.S. Postal Service, underscore the company's brand heritage focus, though these have not fully offset near-term valuation concerns.
WWW Overview and Recent Performance
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. manufactures and markets performance footwear and apparel through a portfolio of owned and licensed brands. The stock has shown relative strength in recent market activity, delivering year-to-date returns of approximately 14.7%, outperforming the S&P 500. Following first-quarter fiscal 2026 results released in mid-May, the company reported an 11% year-over-year revenue increase to $457.6 million and an adjusted earnings per share beat. Analyst sentiment remains constructive on operational momentum, though price targets have seen modest adjustments. The shares trade near $15.30, within a 52-week range of $13.47 to $32.80, reflecting ongoing efforts to stabilize and grow in a competitive footwear landscape.
Trending AI Robots
Trending AI Robots showcases Tickeron’s curated selection of AI trading bots. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the best and most suitable for current market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots demonstrate varied performance metrics, with historical win rates often ranging from 55% to 75% depending on strategy and timeframe, alongside diverse risk-adjusted returns. All the AI trading bots have different trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and sets of tickers they trade. This resource provides traders with data-driven options tailored to specific market environments.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Ralph Lauren (RL) emphasizes a luxury-oriented business model centered on brand equity and direct-to-consumer channels, while Wolverine World Wide (WWW) relies on a broader mix of performance and lifestyle footwear with emphasis on cost efficiency and wholesale distribution. Growth drivers differ markedly: RL draws from global premium demand and heritage marketing, whereas WWW benefits from product innovation and margin expansion initiatives. Recent momentum favors WWW, which has posted positive year-to-date gains and a quarterly earnings beat, compared with RL’s recent declines and upcoming earnings event. Risk factors include consumer discretionary spending sensitivity for both, though RL carries higher valuation multiples and greater exposure to economic cycles affecting luxury goods. Sector exposure places RL in upscale apparel and WWW in athletic and work footwear, leading to distinct market sentiment patterns.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable near-term performance to Wolverine World Wide (WWW). Its recent earnings beat, year-to-date outperformance, and operational momentum provide clearer positive signals than the more cautious setup surrounding Ralph Lauren (RL) ahead of its earnings release. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to prevailing market conditions rather than a definitive forecast.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RL is a StrongBuy and WWW is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWWW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- RL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- WWW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWW’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WWW’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
RL (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а -0.35% price change this week, while WWW (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was -2.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.64%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -6.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
RL is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
WWW is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Apparel/Footwear (-1.13% weekly)Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
@Wholesale Distributors (-6.70% weekly)Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
| RL | WWW | RL / WWW | |
| Capitalization | 24.5B | 1.42B | 1,725% |
| EBITDA | 1.47B | 191M | 767% |
| Gain YTD | 16.526 | -3.453 | -479% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.20 | 14.08 | 193% |
| Revenue | 8.12B | 1.92B | 423% |
| Total Cash | 2.07B | 120M | 1,721% |
| Total Debt | 3.01B | 785M | 383% |
RL | WWW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 28 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WWW's Valuation (13) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RL (71) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that WWW’s stock grew somewhat faster than RL’s over the last 12 months.
RL's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for WWW (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that RL’s stock grew significantly faster than WWW’s over the last 12 months.
RL's SMR Rating (28) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as WWW (35) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that RL’s stock grew similarly to WWW’s over the last 12 months.
RL's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WWW (47) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that RL’s stock grew somewhat faster than WWW’s over the last 12 months.
RL's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WWW (77) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that RL’s stock grew somewhat faster than WWW’s over the last 12 months.
| RL | WWW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 72% | 12 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 61% | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| FOREX / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GBPCNY | 9.21 | 0.27 | +3.05% |
| United Kingdom Pound - China Yuan | |||
| APCB | 29.34 | -0.05 | -0.17% |
| ActivePassive Core Bond ETF | |||
| NZDCAD | 0.80 | -0.02 | -2.05% |
| New Zealand Dollar - Canadian Dollar | |||
| CNYEUR | 0.13 | -0.00 | -2.77% |
| China Yuan - Euro | |||
| AUDGBP | 0.51 | -0.02 | -3.62% |
| Australian Dollar - United Kingdom Pound | |||
RL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RL has been loosely correlated with WWW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RL jumps, then WWW could also see price increases.