LIND
Price
$11.94
Change
+$0.43 (+3.74%)
Updated
Nov 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
638.22M
102 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TNL
Price
$64.72
Change
+$3.33 (+5.42%)
Updated
Nov 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.95B
96 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIND vs TNL

Header iconLIND vs TNL Comparison
Open Charts LIND vs TNLBanner chart's image
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings
Price$11.94
Change+$0.43 (+3.74%)
Volume$5.08K
Capitalization638.22M
Travel + Leisure
Price$64.72
Change+$3.33 (+5.42%)
Volume$3.16K
Capitalization3.95B
LIND vs TNL Comparison Chart in %
LIND
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TNL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIND vs. TNL commentary
Nov 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIND is a Hold and TNL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 21, 2025
Stock price -- (LIND: $11.52 vs. TNL: $61.39)
Brand notoriety: LIND and TNL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIND: 117% vs. TNL: 57%
Market capitalization -- LIND: $638.22M vs. TNL: $3.95B
LIND [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $638.22M. TNL’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $3.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $147.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $15.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTNL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LIND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TNL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNL is a better buy in the long-term than LIND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIND’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TNL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LIND is a better buy in the short-term than TNL.

Price Growth

LIND (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -4.40% price change this week, while TNL (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -3.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIND is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

TNL is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+1.26% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNL($3.95B) has a higher market cap than LIND($638M). TNL YTD gains are higher at: 25.622 vs. LIND (-2.867). TNL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 923M vs. LIND (96.1M). TNL has more cash in the bank: 240M vs. LIND (201M). LIND has less debt than TNL: LIND (628M) vs TNL (5.58B). TNL has higher revenues than LIND: TNL (3.97B) vs LIND (702M).
LINDTNLLIND / TNL
Capitalization638M3.95B16%
EBITDA96.1M923M10%
Gain YTD-2.86725.622-11%
P/E RatioN/A10.16-
Revenue702M3.97B18%
Total Cash201M240M84%
Total Debt628M5.58B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIND vs TNL: Fundamental Ratings
LIND
TNL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1484
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8536
SMR RATING
1..100
1003
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9735
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TNL's Valuation (20) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (88) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIND (85) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's SMR Rating (3) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as LIND (60) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIND (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LINDTNL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIND
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TNL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FHECX15.35N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate C
AEYMX14.92N/A
N/A
American Century Emerging Markets Y
GEMWX14.66N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Emerging Mkt Eq ex. Chn R6
VGRTX83.60N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Value R2
SAHMX16.98-0.01
-0.06%
SA International Value

LIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been loosely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIND
1D Price
Change %
LIND100%
-1.37%
CUK - LIND
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.78%
CCL - LIND
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.91%
RCL - LIND
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
NCLH - LIND
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
VIK - LIND
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
More

TNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNL has been closely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TNL jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNL
1D Price
Change %
TNL100%
-1.06%
CCL - TNL
68%
Closely correlated
-2.91%
CUK - TNL
68%
Closely correlated
-2.78%
RCL - TNL
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
VIK - TNL
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
NCLH - TNL
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
More