Advertisement
LSCC vs NDAQ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCC is a Buy and NDAQ is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LSCC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LSCC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NDAQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LSCC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LSCC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NDAQ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LSCC (@Semiconductors) experienced а -2.93% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.95%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
LSCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (+0.94% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.29% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| LSCC | NDAQ | LSCC / NDAQ | |
| Capitalization | 7.16B | 36.3B | 20% |
| EBITDA | 95.7M | 2B | 5% |
| Gain YTD | -8.067 | 15.123 | -53% |
| P/E Ratio | 140.76 | 29.93 | 470% |
| Revenue | 489M | 6.06B | 8% |
| Total Cash | 128M | 641M | 20% |
| Total Debt | 21.8M | 10.9B | 0% |
LSCC | NDAQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 14 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LSCC's Valuation (50) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as NDAQ (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that LSCC’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSCC (67) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's SMR Rating (100) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LSCC (100) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSCC (50) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LSCC (100) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
| LSCC | NDAQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 39% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 63% |
Advertisement
LSCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSCC has been closely correlated with ADI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LSCC jumps, then ADI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSCC | 100% | -1.94% | ||
| ADI - LSCC | 80% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| ENTG - LSCC | 79% Closely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| MCHP - LSCC | 78% Closely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| NXPI - LSCC | 77% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| SLAB - LSCC | 76% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
More | ||||
NDAQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ | 100% | -1.37% | ||
| MCO - NDAQ | 76% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| JEF - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| MS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| GS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| SF - NDAQ | 68% Closely correlated | -2.69% | ||
More | ||||