Advertisement
MS vs NDAQ
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Morgan Stanley (MS) vs. Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- MS delivered record Q1 revenues of $20.6 billion and EPS of $3.43, surpassing expectations amid strong investment banking and wealth management growth.
- NDAQ posted solid Q1 results with $1.41 billion in revenue and adjusted EPS of $0.96, beating estimates driven by financial technology expansion.
- MS shares have shown stronger recent momentum, with YTD gains of about 7.8% and robust monthly advances around 14-18%, outpacing NDAQ's 5.7% YTD rise.
- MS trades at a lower P/E ratio of 17.2x compared to NDAQ's 27.5x, suggesting relatively attractive valuation for its scale.
- Both stocks benefit from financial sector tailwinds like AI-driven demand and market optimism, but MS exhibits greater stability in recent market activity.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines MS (Morgan Stanley), a global investment bank, and NDAQ (Nasdaq, Inc.), an exchange operator with technology solutions. Both operate in the financial services sector, benefiting from rising trading volumes, M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity, and fintech innovations. Traders seeking exposure to capital markets infrastructure and investors eyeing diversified financial plays may find value in analyzing their relative performance, valuations, and growth drivers amid current market positioning.
MS Overview and Recent Performance
Morgan Stanley (MS) is a leading investment bank offering wealth management, institutional securities, and investment management services. In recent market activity, its shares have advanced significantly, hitting near 52-week highs around $194 amid broader sector strength. The firm reported record first-quarter revenues of $20.6 billion, up sharply year-over-year, fueled by a 36% surge in investment banking fees from heightened M&A and equity underwriting. Wealth management net new assets reached strong inflows, bolstering sentiment. Analysts note bullish outlooks tied to earnings growth and AI-related opportunities, contributing to positive price behavior and outperformance versus benchmarks in recent weeks.
NDAQ Overview and Recent Performance
Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) operates the Nasdaq stock exchange and provides market technology, data analytics, and regulatory solutions. Recent stock behavior reflects volatility, with shares trading around $91 after a Q1 earnings beat but facing some pullback pressures. The company achieved $1.41 billion in net revenue for the quarter, a 13-14% increase, driven by financial technology (FinTech) and anti-money laundering solutions growth. Expansion in cloud-based offerings and capital returns via dividends influenced sentiment, though trading volumes and regulatory dynamics have tempered momentum in recent weeks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top-performing AI trading bots curated for current market conditions from hundreds available (351 total AI robots trading thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto). Only 25 elite bots earn a spot in this dynamic section, selected by AI analysis for their adaptability to prevailing trends like volatility in financials or tech-driven rallies. These bots employ diverse strategies—short-term scalping, swing trading, or long-term trend following—with varying timeframes, risk profiles, and performance histories tailored to specific sectors. Explore them to align automated trading with your style and discover bots potentially suited for MS or NDAQ exposure.
Head-to-Head Comparison
MS and NDAQ contrast in business models: MS as a full-service bank emphasizes client-facing wealth and advisory, while NDAQ focuses on exchange infrastructure and data monetization. Growth drivers differ—MS leverages asset inflows and IB cycles, NDAQ capitalizes on FinTech SaaS and trading tech. Recent momentum favors MS with superior YTD and monthly gains, versus NDAQ's steadier but less explosive path. Risk factors include market volatility for MS (tied to NII or net interest income) and competition/regulatory scrutiny for NDAQ. Sector exposure overlaps in financials, but MS offers broader diversification; sentiment tilts toward MS on valuation and scale.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward MS based on trend consistency from record earnings, stronger relative momentum, lower P/E positioning, and resilient catalysts like wealth growth. While NDAQ shows promise in FinTech stability, MS exhibits higher probability for near-term outperformance in the prevailing environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a Buy and NDAQ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- NDAQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NDAQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.89% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -5.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.37%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -4.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.19%.
Reported Earning Dates
MS is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.89% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (-4.17% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| MS | NDAQ | MS / NDAQ | |
| Capitalization | 344B | 50B | 688% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 3.32B | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.680 | -9.856 | -210% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.20 | 26.29 | 73% |
| Revenue | 68.8B | 8.3B | 829% |
| Total Cash | 4.29B | 2.38B | 180% |
| Total Debt | 394B | 9.45B | 4,172% |
MS | NDAQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NDAQ's Valuation (72) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (90). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.
MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (27). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
MS's SMR Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (53). This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
MS's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (54). This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
MS's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (81). This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
| MS | NDAQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 53% |
Advertisement
MS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MS has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MS jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
NDAQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ | 100% | -1.32% | ||
| JEF - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| MS - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| GS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | -4.94% | ||
| RJF - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| SPGI - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | +1.03% | ||
More | ||||