Advertisement
MS vs NDAQ
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Morgan Stanley (MS) vs. Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- MS delivered record Q2 2026 revenues of $21.3 billion and EPS of $3.46, with wealth management client assets reaching $10 trillion.
- NDAQ reported Q2 2026 net revenue of $1.5 billion (up 15% year-over-year) and non-GAAP EPS of $1.07, supported by record index ETP assets under management exceeding $1 trillion.
- Over the past year, MS shares gained approximately 37%, while NDAQ shares declined about 5% amid mixed market conditions.
- MS benefits from diversified exposure across institutional securities and wealth management, whereas NDAQ focuses on exchange operations, data, and technology solutions.
- Recent market activity shows MS with stronger momentum from capital markets activity, while NDAQ highlights recurring revenue stability and innovation in private markets and tokenization.
- Both companies operate in financial services but differ in growth drivers, with MS showing higher recent earnings growth and NDAQ emphasizing operational resilience.
Introduction
This comparison examines MS (Morgan Stanley) and NDAQ (Nasdaq, Inc.) to highlight their distinct business models, recent performance trends, and positioning within the financial sector. Morgan Stanley is a global investment bank and wealth manager, while Nasdaq, Inc. operates exchanges, provides market data, and offers technology solutions. Traders and investors interested in capital markets exposure, recurring revenue streams, or relative performance between traditional banking and exchange operators may find this analysis relevant for assessing diversification opportunities and sector dynamics in the current environment.
MS Overview and Recent Performance
Morgan Stanley provides investment banking, wealth management, and investment management services. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected strong fundamentals following its Q2 2026 earnings release, which included record revenues and a 15% dividend increase. Wealth management net new assets reached record levels, driven by client inflows and capital markets activity. Recent market activity shows share price stability around the $214 level with a one-year gain near 37%, supported by robust institutional securities performance and ongoing technology investments. Sentiment has been influenced by positive earnings surprises and capital return initiatives, though broader market volatility has occasionally pressured the shares alongside peers.
NDAQ Overview and Recent Performance
Nasdaq, Inc. operates global exchanges, offers market technology, data analytics, and index products. In recent weeks, the company highlighted Q2 2026 results featuring double-digit revenue growth across divisions and record index exchange-traded product assets under management surpassing $1 trillion. The stock has traded near $91, with a one-year performance showing modest declines amid sector rotation. Recent developments include advancements in private market solutions, tokenization initiatives, and listings such as notable IPOs. Performance has been shaped by steady recurring revenue from solutions and index businesses, offset by sensitivity to overall market volumes and competitive pressures in trading services.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only those demonstrating superior adaptability, consistent performance metrics, and alignment with current trends earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and statistical profiles, including varying win rates, drawdowns, and ticker-specific focuses. This resource provides traders with data-driven options for automated strategies across equities and other assets. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed performance statistics and configuration details.
Head-to-Head Comparison
MS operates a diversified model combining cyclical investment banking with fee-based wealth management, exposing it to capital markets volatility but also to asset-gathering tailwinds. NDAQ derives more stable revenue from exchange operations, data subscriptions, and technology platforms, with higher exposure to market infrastructure and regulatory themes. Recent momentum favors MS through stronger earnings growth and wealth inflows, while NDAQ emphasizes predictability via annualized recurring revenue. Risk factors for MS include interest rate sensitivity and credit exposure; for NDAQ, they center on trading volume fluctuations and competition in fintech. Sector sentiment reflects broader financials optimism for banks amid economic resilience, contrasted with steady demand for exchange and data services.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in earnings beats, stability from diversified client assets, and recent capital markets catalysts, Tickeron’s AI may currently assign a probabilistic edge to MS over NDAQ. NDAQ demonstrates resilience through recurring revenue but has shown comparatively muted price momentum in recent periods. This assessment draws from relative positioning in growth metrics and sector dynamics rather than forward projections.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a Hold and NDAQ is a Hold.
| MS | NDAQ | MS / NDAQ | |
| Capitalization | 318B | 51B | 624% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 3.43B | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.529 | -5.036 | -328% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.44 | 26.62 | 62% |
| Revenue | 73.1B | 8.74B | 837% |
| Total Cash | 4.29B | 2.79B | 154% |
| Total Debt | 422B | 9.24B | 4,566% |
MS | NDAQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NDAQ's Valuation (61) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (85). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.
MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (34). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (52). This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
MS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (56). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
MS's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (75). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
| MS | NDAQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 65% | 26 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 57% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while NDAQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NDAQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- NDAQ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.30% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -0.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.41%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
MS is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2026.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.77% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.89% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
Advertisement
MS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MS has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MS jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
NDAQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ | 100% | +2.87% | ||
| JEF - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| MS - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| GS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| RJF - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| SPGI - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
More | ||||