LUGDF
Price
$54.36
Change
+$0.68 (+1.27%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.16B
53 days until earnings call
PAAS
Price
$29.01
Change
+$0.05 (+0.17%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.59B
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUGDF vs PAAS

Header iconLUGDF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts LUGDF vs PAASBanner chart's image
Lundin Gold
Price$54.36
Change+$0.68 (+1.27%)
Volume$102.29K
Capitalization3.16B
Pan American Silver
Price$29.01
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
Volume$5.05M
Capitalization5.59B
LUGDF vs PAAS Comparison Chart
Loading...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUGDF vs. PAAS commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUGDF is a StrongBuy and PAAS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (LUGDF: $54.36 vs. PAAS: $29.01)
Brand notoriety: LUGDF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUGDF: 306% vs. PAAS: 85%
Market capitalization -- LUGDF: $3.16B vs. PAAS: $5.59B
LUGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.16B. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUGDF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than PAAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUGDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the short-term than LUGDF.

Price Growth

LUGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.59% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($5.59B) has a higher market cap than LUGDF($3.16B). LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 162.541 vs. PAAS (44.701). LUGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 387M vs. PAAS (296M). PAAS has higher revenues than LUGDF: PAAS (2.02B) vs LUGDF (856M).
LUGDFPAASLUGDF / PAAS
Capitalization3.16B5.59B57%
EBITDA387M296M131%
Gain YTD162.54144.701364%
P/E Ratio30.67N/A-
Revenue856M2.02B42%
Total Cash210MN/A-
Total Debt430MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUGDF vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
LUGDF
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5047
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
280
SMR RATING
1..100
2179
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2397
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUGDF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (16) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PAAS (80) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAAS (79) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PAAS (97) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUGDFPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRZBY32.34-0.19
-0.58%
Commerzbank AG
EQX6.44-0.10
-1.53%
Equinox Gold Corp
DBOEY30.80-0.70
-2.22%
Deutsche Boerse AG
LYTS16.11-0.48
-2.89%
LSI Industries
LDTC0.20-0.02
-8.26%
LeddarTech Holdings

LUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUGDF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUGDF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUGDF
1D Price
Change %
LUGDF100%
+1.27%
AEM - LUGDF
70%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
PAAS - LUGDF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
TORXF - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
KGC - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
AGI - LUGDF
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
More

PAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAAS
1D Price
Change %
PAAS100%
+0.17%
AEM - PAAS
80%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
WPM - PAAS
78%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
AGI - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
MAG - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
CDE - PAAS
76%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
More