Advertisement
LVS vs WYNN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Las Vegas Sands (LVS) vs. Wynn Resorts (WYNN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both LVS and WYNN are casino and resort operators heavily exposed to Macau, where gaming revenue has softened amid China's scrutiny of capital outflows.
- LVS is an Asia-only operator (Macau plus Singapore's Marina Bay Sands), while WYNN is diversified across Las Vegas, Boston, Macau, and a UAE development pipeline.
- Recent quarterly results diverged in tone: LVS missed estimates on unusually low rolling-play hold, while WYNN beat on strength at Wynn Palace.
- Both stocks have declined sharply over the past year, with comparable relative performance in recent weeks.
- LVS offers greater scale and a stronger capital-return program, whereas WYNN carries higher leverage but a tangible growth catalyst in the UAE.
Introduction
Las Vegas Sands and Wynn Resorts are two of the most closely watched names in the global casino and integrated-resort sector, and both generate a meaningful share of revenue from Macau, the world's largest gaming market. Because their fortunes are tied to overlapping demand drivers — Chinese tourism, premium-mass gaming, and VIP volume — investors frequently use them as a paired trade to express views on the Asian gaming recovery. This stock comparison is relevant to investors and traders weighing geographic diversification, balance-sheet strength, and growth catalysts. Recent market activity has compressed valuations across the group, making a fact-based review of relative performance and market positioning especially timely.
LVS Overview and Recent Performance
Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) is a global developer and operator of large-scale integrated resorts, with virtually all of its operations in Asia: Macau (roughly 57% of net sales) and Singapore's Marina Bay Sands (roughly 43%). The company sold its Las Vegas properties in 2022, making it a pure play on Asian tourism and gaming.
Recent performance has been mixed. First-quarter 2026 results were strong, with revenues rising more than 25% year over year, driven by a record quarter at Marina Bay Sands, where adjusted property EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) climbed roughly 30% and the margin reached about 53%. However, second-quarter results missed consensus expectations, as unusually low rolling-play hold in Macau weighed on profitability even though gaming volumes increased across most segments. The share price has declined meaningfully over the past year, reflecting a broader Macau slowdown and a competitive premium segment. Management has nonetheless emphasized long-term momentum in Singapore, ongoing portfolio renovations, and an aggressive buyback program as key supports for sentiment.
WYNN Overview and Recent Performance
Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) operates a portfolio of premium and ultra-luxury resorts, including Wynn Las Vegas and Encore on the Las Vegas Strip, Encore Boston Harbor, and Wynn Palace and Wynn Macau in Macau. It is also developing Wynn Al Marjan Island in the United Arab Emirates, expected to open in 2027, through a 40%-owned joint venture.
In recent quarters, WYNN has delivered results above consensus. Second-quarter 2026 earnings and revenues beat estimates, led by Wynn Palace, where revenues rose roughly 21% and adjusted property EBITDAR (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and rent) increased about 28%. Las Vegas operations posted a record monthly performance during the period, supported by continued gaming market-share gains. Despite these operational positives, the stock has fallen sharply over the past year, in line with the broader gaming group, as investors discounted Macau headwinds, elevated leverage, and near-term capital spending tied to the UAE development.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a systematic edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Because not every strategy suits every market regime, only the bots best aligned with current conditions earn a place in this featured section. The available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many posting annualized returns, trade counts, and win rates designed to help users assess fit at a glance. Each bot also maintains its own set of tickers, so investors can compare how different automated approaches handle names like LVS and WYNN. Explore the Trending AI Robots to find strategies that match your timeframe and risk preferences.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast between the two companies is geographic exposure. LVS is concentrated entirely in Asia, giving it outsized scale in Macau and a high-margin anchor in Singapore, but no U.S. revenue to offset regional softness. WYNN, by comparison, is more diversified, with Las Vegas and Boston providing earnings that are less correlated to China policy, plus a future growth leg in the UAE.
On capital structure, LVS generally carries a cleaner balance sheet and has prioritized shareholder returns, repurchasing hundreds of millions of dollars in stock alongside a quarterly dividend. WYNN operates with higher leverage and negative book equity, a reflection of its history of buybacks and heavy development spending, which raises sensitivity to rising rates and softer cash flow.
Growth drivers also differ. LVS relies on the ramp-up of Macau properties such as The Londoner and the expansion of Marina Bay Sands. WYNN leans on premium-mass share gains at Wynn Palace and the longer-dated UAE catalyst. In terms of market sentiment, both names have been under pressure in recent weeks, but analyst coverage skews more uniformly bullish on WYNN, where consensus targets imply substantial upside relative to the current price.
Tickeron AI Verdict
On balance, Tickeron's AI would likely tilt toward LVS for its combination of scale, a resilient Singapore franchise, stronger free cash flow, and a disciplined capital-return program — characteristics that tend to score favorably on stability and trend-consistency metrics during a risk-off tape. That said, the preference is marginal and probabilistic: WYNN offers a more diversified revenue base and a concrete long-term catalyst in the UAE, albeit with higher leverage. Because both stocks remain in comparable downtrends tied to Macau, the AI's stance would remain data-dependent and subject to change as momentum and catalysts evolve.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVS is a Hold and WYNN is a Hold.
LVS | WYNN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LVS's Valuation (56) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WYNN (90). This means that LVS’s stock grew somewhat faster than WYNN’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as WYNN (100). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to WYNN’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's SMR Rating (12) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for WYNN (100). This means that LVS’s stock grew significantly faster than WYNN’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as WYNN (65). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to WYNN’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as WYNN (91). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to WYNN’s over the last 12 months.
| LVS | WYNN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 77% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LVS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while WYNN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LVS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WYNN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LVS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WYNN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LVS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
- WYNN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
LVS (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -0.17% price change this week, while WYNN (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -0.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
LVS is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
WYNN is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-2.02% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
Advertisement
LVS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVS has been loosely correlated with MLCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LVS jumps, then MLCO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVS | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| MLCO - LVS | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| BRSL - LVS | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| INSE - LVS | 38% Loosely correlated | +6.53% | ||
| DKNG - LVS | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| MGM - LVS | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
More | ||||
WYNN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WYNN has been loosely correlated with LVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WYNN jumps, then LVS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WYNN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WYNN | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| LVS - WYNN | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| MLCO - WYNN | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| MGM - WYNN | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| INSE - WYNN | 44% Loosely correlated | +6.53% | ||
| DKNG - WYNN | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
More | ||||