LVS and WYNN stand as prominent players in the global gaming and hospitality sector, with heavy exposure to Asia's recovering casino markets like Macao and Singapore. This comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning amid ongoing tourism rebounds and expansion initiatives. Traders seeking momentum in consumer discretionary stocks and long-term investors eyeing gaming sector growth will find value in understanding their relative strengths, valuations, and risks. Both companies navigate macroeconomic sensitivities, including travel demand and regional regulations, making head-to-head insights essential for portfolio decisions.
Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) focuses on integrated resorts in Asia, including Marina Bay Sands in Singapore and multiple properties in Macao such as The Venetian and The Londoner, following its 2022 divestiture of Las Vegas assets. With a market cap of $38 billion and beta of 0.89 (a measure of volatility relative to the market), LVS emphasizes scale in high-margin gaming and non-gaming revenue.
In recent market activity, LVS shares have shown resilience, trading around $57 with year-to-date gains near 12%. Sentiment has lifted on the appointment of Patrick Dumont as CEO and anticipation for Q1 earnings on April 22, projecting EPS of $0.76 and revenue growth from Macao and Singapore. Analysts highlight its value and momentum attributes, though a Jefferies downgrade cited cost pressures. Strong return on equity (ROE, 73%) and operating cash flow of $3 billion underscore operational strength amid Asia's demand surge.
Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) operates luxury resorts including Wynn Palace and Wynn Macau in Asia, alongside Las Vegas and Encore Boston Harbor properties. It is advancing a $5.1 billion Al Marjan Island project in the UAE. Market cap stands at $11 billion with a beta of 1.03, reflecting higher volatility.
Recent weeks have seen WYNN shares hover near $106, mirroring sector year-to-date gains of about 12%. Progress on the UAE resort and Q1 earnings anticipation have supported sentiment, despite valuation concerns and mixed prior results. Jefferies maintains a Buy rating with a $150 target, balancing Macao recovery against expansion risks. Profit margins lag at 4.6%, but operating cash flow of $1.35 billion supports growth initiatives.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from over 350 available, each trained on thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading and technical analysis (TA), with timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days. Performance highlights include annualized returns ranging from 15% to 168%, win rates of 54% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. For instance, semiconductor-focused bots show +97% annualized returns with 69% win rates, while industrials bots deliver +71% returns. Ideal for current volatile conditions, they offer copy-trading for various risk profiles. Explore these high-conviction options to enhance your trading edge.
LVS and WYNN share Macau exposure but diverge in models: LVS is Asia-pure play post-U.S. sale, prioritizing mass-market volume, while WYNN blends premium U.S. operations with UAE expansion for diversification. Growth drivers include Asia recovery for both, but WYNN's Al Marjan adds long-term Middle East potential versus LVS's established Singapore stability.
Recent momentum is comparable YTD, yet LVS edges on lower beta for stability. Risks feature elevated debt/equity for LVS and profitability pressures for WYNN. Sector ties to travel amplify sensitivity to economic shifts. Market sentiment favors LVS for value (PEG 1.03), while WYNN trades at a premium on growth prospects.
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward LVS due to superior profitability metrics, attractive forward valuation, lower volatility, and consistent trend strength from Asia operations. While WYNN offers diversification upside, LVS's scale and momentum position it favorably in probabilistic scenarios amid gaming recovery—though both warrant monitoring post-earnings.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LVS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWYNN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LVS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WYNN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
LVS (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -2.07% price change this week, while WYNN (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +1.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +2.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.03%.
LVS is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
WYNN is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| LVS | WYNN | LVS / WYNN | |
| Capitalization | 33B | 11B | 300% |
| EBITDA | 4.79B | 1.83B | 262% |
| Gain YTD | -22.737 | -11.518 | 197% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.35 | 30.36 | 60% |
| Revenue | 13.7B | 7.29B | 188% |
| Total Cash | 3.33B | 1.8B | 186% |
| Total Debt | 15.7B | 12.2B | 129% |
LVS | WYNN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LVS's Valuation (63) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as WYNN (95). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to WYNN’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as WYNN (100). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to WYNN’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's SMR Rating (13) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for WYNN (100). This means that LVS’s stock grew significantly faster than WYNN’s over the last 12 months.
WYNN's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as LVS (59). This means that WYNN’s stock grew similarly to LVS’s over the last 12 months.
WYNN's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVS (75). This means that WYNN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVS’s over the last 12 months.
| LVS | WYNN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 66% | 9 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVS has been closely correlated with WYNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVS jumps, then WYNN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVS | 100% | -1.84% | ||
| WYNN - LVS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| MLCO - LVS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| MGM - LVS | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| BRSL - LVS | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| INSE - LVS | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WYNN has been closely correlated with LVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WYNN jumps, then LVS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WYNN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WYNN | 100% | -1.22% | ||
| LVS - WYNN | 66% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| MGM - WYNN | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| MLCO - WYNN | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| BYD - WYNN | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| INSE - WYNN | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
More | ||||