MAG
Price
$15.17
Change
+$0.09 (+0.60%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
67 days until earnings call
RGLD
Price
$138.54
Change
+$0.24 (+0.17%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
8B
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MAG vs RGLD

Header iconMAG vs RGLD Comparison
Open Charts MAG vs RGLDBanner chart's image
MAG Silver
Price$15.17
Change+$0.09 (+0.60%)
Volume$639.75K
Capitalization1.12B
Royal Gold
Price$138.54
Change+$0.24 (+0.17%)
Volume$331.27K
Capitalization8B
MAG vs RGLD Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAG vs. RGLD commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAG is a Hold and RGLD is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (MAG: $15.17 vs. RGLD: $138.54)
Brand notoriety: MAG and RGLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAG: 118% vs. RGLD: 85%
Market capitalization -- MAG: $1.12B vs. RGLD: $8B
MAG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.12B. RGLD’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGLD is a better buy in the long-term than MAG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGLD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RGLD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGLD is a better buy in the short-term than MAG.

Price Growth

MAG (@Precious Metals) experienced а +8.05% price change this week, while RGLD (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAG is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

RGLD is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLD($8B) has a higher market cap than MAG($1.12B). RGLD has higher P/E ratio than MAG: RGLD (33.74) vs MAG (22.98). MAG YTD gains are higher at: 11.544 vs. RGLD (5.427). RGLD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 478M vs. MAG (-13.89M). RGLD has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. MAG (68.7M). MAG has less debt than RGLD: MAG (154K) vs RGLD (246M). RGLD has higher revenues than MAG: RGLD (606M) vs MAG (0).
MAGRGLDMAG / RGLD
Capitalization1.12B8B14%
EBITDA-13.89M478M-3%
Gain YTD11.5445.427213%
P/E Ratio22.9833.7468%
Revenue0606M-
Total Cash68.7M104M66%
Total Debt154K246M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAG vs RGLD: Fundamental Ratings
MAG
RGLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
168
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6955
SMR RATING
1..100
5770
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4456
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8250
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGLD's Valuation (17) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAG (93). This means that RGLD’s stock grew significantly faster than MAG’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MAG (69). This means that RGLD’s stock grew similarly to MAG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's SMR Rating (57) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RGLD (70). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RGLD (56). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MAG (82). This means that RGLD’s stock grew similarly to MAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAGRGLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCICX47.390.68
+1.46%
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info C
VNVNX25.890.21
+0.82%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap N
OGRIX33.580.18
+0.54%
Invesco Comstock Select R6
MIEAX13.67N/A
N/A
MM S&P 500® Index R4
JOMMX12.69N/A
N/A
JOHCM Emerging Mkts Discovery Instl

MAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAG has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAG jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAG
1D Price
Change %
MAG100%
+0.60%
PAAS - MAG
86%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
AG - MAG
82%
Closely correlated
+5.04%
HL - MAG
82%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
CDE - MAG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
AEM - MAG
78%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
More

RGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGLD has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGLD jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLD
1D Price
Change %
RGLD100%
+0.17%
AEM - RGLD
81%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
AGI - RGLD
79%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
WPM - RGLD
78%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
GOLD - RGLD
76%
Closely correlated
+1.59%
MAG - RGLD
76%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
More