Advertisement
MDLZ vs SMPL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDLZ is a Buy and SMPL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MDLZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MDLZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SMPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MDLZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMPL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MDLZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SMPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.39% price change this week, while SMPL (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -4.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.87%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +252.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
SMPL is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.75% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
@Food: Major Diversified (+0.22% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| MDLZ | SMPL | MDLZ / SMPL | |
| Capitalization | 79.7B | 2.63B | 3,033% |
| EBITDA | 6B | 248M | 2,420% |
| Gain YTD | 5.222 | -30.375 | -17% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.56 | 18.98 | 119% |
| Revenue | 37.1B | 1.46B | 2,545% |
| Total Cash | 1.5B | 98M | 1,535% |
| Total Debt | 21.5B | 249M | 8,635% |
MDLZ | SMPL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 88 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDLZ's Valuation (37) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMPL (88). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as SMPL (88). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's SMR Rating (58) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as SMPL (77). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as SMPL (85). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as SMPL (74). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
| MDLZ | SMPL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 54% | 13 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 6 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
MDLZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZ | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| GIS - MDLZ | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| CAG - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| HSY - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| CPB - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| KHC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
More | ||||
SMPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMPL has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMPL jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMPL | 100% | -1.92% | ||
| FLO - SMPL | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.64% | ||
| MKC - SMPL | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| GIS - SMPL | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| KHC - SMPL | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| THS - SMPL | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
More | ||||