MMLG vs QCOM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMLG is a Hold and QCOM is a Hold.
QCOM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MMLG | QCOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MLORX | 7.63 | 0.12 | +1.60% |
| Cohen & Steers Future of Energy R | |||
| VDMCX | 8.94 | 0.12 | +1.36% |
| Virtus KAR Developing Markets C | |||
| GGDPX | 13.31 | 0.11 | +0.83% |
| Goldman Sachs Intl Sm Cp Insghts P | |||
| GSPUX | 35.54 | 0.09 | +0.25% |
| Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core R6 | |||
| DRTCX | 16.58 | -0.08 | -0.48% |
| BNY Mellon Sust US Equity I | |||
MMLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMLG has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MMLG jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MMLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLG | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| ARES - MMLG | 76% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| QCOM - MMLG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| KKR - MMLG | 74% Closely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| COHR - MMLG | 73% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| CDNS - MMLG | 73% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||
QCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| KLAC - QCOM | 80% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| AMAT - QCOM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| LRCX - QCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| ADI - QCOM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| ACLS - QCOM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||