NAT vs SFL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAT is a Sell and SFL is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NAT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SFL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
NAT (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -2.29% price change this week, while SFL (@Marine Shipping) price change was +3.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.27%.
Reported Earning Dates
NAT is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
SFL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Marine Shipping (-0.76% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
| NAT | SFL | NAT / SFL | |
| Capitalization | 626M | 1.43B | 44% |
| EBITDA | 96M | 529M | 18% |
| Gain YTD | -21.860 | 2.888 | -757% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.31 | 10.89 | 95% |
| Revenue | 365M | 822M | 44% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 206M | - |
| Total Debt | 294M | 2.82B | 10% |
NAT | SFL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NAT's Valuation (3) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (10). This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.
SFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (86). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.
NAT's SMR Rating (61) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (62). This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.
SFL's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (82). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.
NAT's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFL (75). This means that NAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFL’s over the last 12 months.
| NAT | SFL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 10 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 48% |
SFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFL has been loosely correlated with ASC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFL jumps, then ASC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFL | 100% | +2.35% | ||
| ASC - SFL | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.49% | ||
| SB - SFL | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| NMM - SFL | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| CMRE - SFL | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.63% | ||
| GOGL - SFL | 44% Loosely correlated | -5.41% | ||
More | ||||