NEM
Price
$86.27
Change
-$0.26 (-0.30%)
Updated
Nov 25 closing price
Capitalization
94.14B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
USAU
Price
$15.83
Change
+$0.11 (+0.70%)
Updated
Nov 25 closing price
Capitalization
227.68M
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NEM vs USAU

Header iconNEM vs USAU Comparison
Open Charts NEM vs USAUBanner chart's image
Newmont
Price$86.27
Change-$0.26 (-0.30%)
Volume$8.18M
Capitalization94.14B
US Gold
Price$15.83
Change+$0.11 (+0.70%)
Volume$167.36K
Capitalization227.68M
NEM vs USAU Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NEM vs. USAU commentary
Nov 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEM is a StrongBuy and USAU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 26, 2025
Stock price -- (NEM: $86.27 vs. USAU: $15.83)
Brand notoriety: NEM: Notable vs. USAU: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NEM: 68% vs. USAU: 50%
Market capitalization -- NEM: $94.14B vs. USAU: $227.68M
NEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $94.14B. USAU’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $227.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $106.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NEM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUSAU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • USAU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the long-term than USAU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USAU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USAU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the short-term than USAU.

Price Growth

NEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while USAU (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

NEM is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

USAU is expected to report earnings on Nov 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.15% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($94.1B) has a higher market cap than USAU($228M). USAU YTD gains are higher at: 158.238 vs. NEM (135.031). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13B vs. USAU (-13.96M). NEM has more cash in the bank: 5.97B vs. USAU (11.3M). USAU has less debt than NEM: USAU (97.6K) vs NEM (5.65B). NEM has higher revenues than USAU: NEM (21.5B) vs USAU (0).
NEMUSAUNEM / USAU
Capitalization94.1B228M41,272%
EBITDA13B-13.96M-93,124%
Gain YTD135.031158.23885%
P/E Ratio13.42N/A-
Revenue21.5B0-
Total Cash5.97B11.3M52,805%
Total Debt5.65B97.6K5,789,959%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NEM vs USAU: Fundamental Ratings
NEM
USAU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8273
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5563
SMR RATING
1..100
3997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NEM's Valuation (20) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USAU (62). This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than USAU’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as USAU (63). This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to USAU’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's SMR Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USAU (97). This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than USAU’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USAU (40). This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than USAU’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USAU (100). This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than USAU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NEMUSAU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USAU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMSF29.780.27
+0.91%
Matthews Emerging Markets Sus Fut ActETF
SIHY46.100.12
+0.26%
Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF
BINC53.300.11
+0.21%
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
AVSF47.280.05
+0.11%
Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF
IGCB46.56N/A
N/A
TCW Corporate Bond ETF

NEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEM
1D Price
Change %
NEM100%
-0.30%
WPM - NEM
81%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
FNV - NEM
77%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
AGI - NEM
77%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
CGAU - NEM
76%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
RGLD - NEM
76%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
More

USAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USAU has been loosely correlated with AU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USAU jumps, then AU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USAU
1D Price
Change %
USAU100%
+0.70%
AU - USAU
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
KGC - USAU
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
AEM - USAU
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
FNV - USAU
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
NEM - USAU
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
More