Healthcare real estate has emerged as one of the most dynamic segments within the REIT universe, fueled by an aging demographic wave and a structural undersupply of senior housing facilities. NHI (National Health Investors) and WELL (Welltower Inc.) are two prominent names in this space, each offering investors a distinct pathway to gain exposure to healthcare property markets. While both companies own and finance income-producing healthcare real estate — ranging from senior living communities to skilled nursing facilities and medical office buildings — their scale, business models, and market positioning differ considerably. This comparison explores how these two healthcare REITs stack up against each other in the current market environment.
National Health Investors, headquartered in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, is a healthcare REIT with a portfolio concentrated in senior housing, skilled nursing facilities, and medical office buildings. With a market capitalization of approximately $3.7 billion, NHI occupies a mid-sized niche within the healthcare REIT landscape. The company has historically favored a triple-net lease structure, where tenants bear most property-level operating expenses, resulting in more predictable cash flows and industry-leading net profit margins exceeding 40%.
In recent quarters, NHI has been actively expanding its Senior Housing Operating Portfolio (SHOP), transitioning from 15 to 26 properties during 2025 and announcing a further nine-property acquisition for $105.5 million — its largest SHOP deal to date. The company deployed $392.3 million in total investments in 2025, marking its most active year since 2016. Normalized FFO (Funds From Operations) per diluted share reached $4.91 for full-year 2025, exceeding initial guidance by nearly 6%. Looking ahead, management has issued 2026 Normalized FFO guidance in the range of $4.94 to $4.99 per share, signaling continued confidence in growth. The stock has shown relative resilience in recent weeks, supported by strong operational execution and a balance sheet with leverage below 4.0 times net debt to adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization).
Welltower Inc., an S&P 500 constituent based in Toledo, Ohio, is the largest pure-play healthcare REIT globally, with a market capitalization exceeding $130 billion. The company invests across three principal segments: Seniors Housing Operating (SHO), triple-net senior housing, and outpatient medical facilities. Its portfolio is concentrated in high-growth metropolitan markets across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Welltower's scale and operational platform have made it a bellwether for the entire healthcare real estate sector.
In recent periods, WELL has posted exceptional operating results, with total portfolio same-store NOI growth of 12.9% in the first quarter of 2025, led by a striking 21.7% gain in its SHO segment. Revenue per occupied room (RevPOR) growth of 5.9% and meaningful margin expansion have underscored the company's pricing power and operational discipline. The company completed approximately $2.8 billion in pro rata gross investments in Q1 2025 alone and entered into a definitive agreement to acquire a $4.6 billion portfolio of ultra-luxury seniors housing communities operated by Amica Senior Lifestyles. Credit rating agencies have taken note: S&P Global Ratings upgraded WELL to "A-" and Moody's to "A3," both with stable outlooks. The stock has delivered a one-year total return exceeding 50% through mid-2026, reflecting robust investor enthusiasm for its growth trajectory.
For traders and investors seeking an analytical edge in comparing stocks like NHI and WELL, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate shifting market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating consistent, adaptive performance earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots employ a wide spectrum of trading styles — from short-term momentum strategies to longer-duration trend-following approaches — each with its own risk parameters, performance track record, and ticker universe. Whether a trader is interested in capturing breakout moves, mean-reversion patterns, or sector rotation signals, the platform provides real-time insight into which algorithmic strategies are currently resonating with market dynamics. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can serve as a valuable starting point for identifying data-driven trading opportunities.
When comparing NHI and WELL, several differentiating factors emerge. The most striking contrast is scale: WELL is roughly 40 times larger by market capitalization and enjoys significantly greater institutional coverage with approximately 25 analyst ratings versus 21 for NHI. This institutional heft provides WELL with a lower cost of capital and superior access to acquisition financing — a critical advantage in a capital-intensive industry.
On valuation, the divergence is equally pronounced. NHI trades at approximately 16 times AFFO and offers a dividend yield above 4.5%, while WELL trades at roughly 35-38 times AFFO with a dividend yield of approximately 1.5%. This valuation gap largely reflects the market's strong preference for WELL's SHO-heavy operating model, which captures senior housing fundamentals in real time, versus NHI's predominantly triple-net lease structure, where rental income adjusts more gradually through lease renewals.
From a risk perspective, NHI's triple-net focus provides more stable, predictable cash flows and higher net margins (roughly 41% versus approximately 10% for WELL). However, it also means NHI captures less near-term upside from the powerful occupancy-and-rate recovery unfolding in senior housing. Conversely, WELL's operating portfolio exposes it more directly to labor cost inflation and occupancy fluctuations but allows it to participate immediately in revenue growth. On price momentum, WELL has clearly outperformed over the trailing one-year and year-to-date periods, but NHI has delivered a respectable total return in its own right while maintaining lower volatility on certain measures.
Based on observable factors that Tickeron's AI trading systems typically weigh — including trend consistency, momentum signals, relative strength, and stability metrics — WELL would likely receive a more favorable near-term assessment. The stock's powerful price trend, exceptional same-store NOI growth in its SHO portfolio, recent credit rating upgrades, and its demonstrated ability to execute large-scale acquisitions at accretive terms combine to form a compelling momentum profile. That said, NHI's significantly lower valuation, higher dividend yield, expanding SHOP platform, and improving operational trajectory could tilt the balance in its favor for AI strategies oriented toward value and income. In probabilistic terms, an AI system scanning both names would likely recognize WELL as the stronger trend-following candidate while acknowledging NHI as an attractive contrarian or value-oriented opportunity depending on the specific algorithm's objective function and time horizon.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsIt is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NHI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWELL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NHI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WELL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
NHI (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while WELL (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was +3.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.96%.
NHI is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
WELL is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.
The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| NHI | WELL | NHI / WELL | |
| Capitalization | 3.9B | 178B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 287M | 2.64B | 11% |
| Gain YTD | 7.931 | 36.753 | 22% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.98 | 121.77 | 21% |
| Revenue | 401M | 11.6B | 3% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 4.7B | - |
| Total Debt | 1.27B | 20B | 6% |
NHI | WELL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 7 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NHI's Valuation (26) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for WELL (92). This means that NHI’s stock grew significantly faster than WELL’s over the last 12 months.
WELL's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NHI (37). This means that WELL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NHI’s over the last 12 months.
NHI's SMR Rating (72) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as WELL (88). This means that NHI’s stock grew similarly to WELL’s over the last 12 months.
WELL's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NHI (45). This means that WELL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NHI’s over the last 12 months.
WELL's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NHI (34). This means that WELL’s stock grew similarly to NHI’s over the last 12 months.
| NHI | WELL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 16 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 59% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NHI has been closely correlated with LTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NHI jumps, then LTC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHI | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| LTC - NHI | 74% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| VTR - NHI | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.67% | ||
| CTRE - NHI | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| OHI - NHI | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| WELL - NHI | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.03% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WELL has been closely correlated with VTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WELL jumps, then VTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WELL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WELL | 100% | +2.03% | ||
| VTR - WELL | 80% Closely correlated | +2.67% | ||
| AHR - WELL | 70% Closely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| OHI - WELL | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| CTRE - WELL | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| REG - WELL | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
More | ||||