Advertisement
NIQ vs TTAN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIQ is a Hold and TTAN is a Hold.
| NIQ | TTAN | NIQ / TTAN | |
| Capitalization | 5.26B | 5.27B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 710M | -44.69M | -1,589% |
| Gain YTD | 8.187 | -48.657 | -17% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.39B | 1.01B | 433% |
| Total Cash | 417M | 422M | 99% |
| Total Debt | 3.8B | 51M | 7,443% |
NIQ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 59 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| NIQ | TTAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 37% | 17 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 50% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NIQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TTAN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- NIQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TTAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NIQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NIQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TTAN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
NIQ (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.99% price change this week, while TTAN (@Packaged Software) price change was -37.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
NIQ is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-4.16% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QOWZ | 36.09 | 0.30 | +0.83% |
| Invesco Nasdaq Free CA Flw Achiev ETF | |||
| FSCS | 36.76 | 0.13 | +0.35% |
| First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF | |||
| SCMC | 24.71 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
| Sterling Capital Multi-Strat Inc ETF | |||
| MYCH | 24.68 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| State Street® My2028 Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| IGSB | 51.53 | -0.05 | -0.10% |
| iShares 1-5 Year Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF | |||
NIQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIQ has been loosely correlated with PAYX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NIQ jumps, then PAYX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIQ | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| PAYX - NIQ | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| TTAN - NIQ | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.37% | ||
| WDAY - NIQ | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TYL - NIQ | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| SSNC - NIQ | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||
TTAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAN has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTAN jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAN | 100% | -2.37% | ||
| CRM - TTAN | 67% Closely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| BRZE - TTAN | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| NOW - TTAN | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| HUBS - TTAN | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| WK - TTAN | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
More | ||||