HUBS
Price
$240.41
Change
+$30.29 (+14.42%)
Updated
Aug 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.99B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TTAN
Price
$93.70
Change
+$1.70 (+1.85%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
8.93B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUBS vs TTAN

HUBS vs TTAN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUBS vs. TTAN commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Hold and TTAN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (HUBS: $210.12 vs. TTAN: $92.00)
Brand notoriety: HUBS and TTAN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUBS: 82% vs. TTAN: 95%
Market capitalization -- HUBS: $10.48B vs. TTAN: $8.78B
HUBS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $10.48B. TTAN’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $8.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $240.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTAN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TTAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTAN is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUBS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TTAN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTAN is a better buy in the short-term than HUBS.

Price Growth

HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -16.02% price change this week, while TTAN (@Packaged Software) price change was +6.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

TTAN is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.77% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($12B) has a higher market cap than TTAN($8.93B). TTAN YTD gains are higher at: -13.615 vs. HUBS (-47.640). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 267M vs. TTAN (-44.69M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. TTAN (422M). TTAN has less debt than HUBS: TTAN (51M) vs HUBS (247M). HUBS has higher revenues than TTAN: HUBS (3.3B) vs TTAN (1.01B).
HUBSTTANHUBS / TTAN
Capitalization12B8.93B134%
EBITDA267M-44.69M-598%
Gain YTD-47.640-13.615350%
P/E Ratio85.59N/A-
Revenue3.3B1.01B325%
Total Cash1.69B422M401%
Total Debt247M51M484%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUBSTTAN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTM0.630.03
+4.18%
Castellum
ISTR30.750.47
+1.55%
Investar Holding Corp
UMBF149.451.91
+1.29%
UMB Financial Corp
BEAGU10.92N/A
N/A
Bold Eagle Acquisition Corp
UA5.12-0.08
-1.54%
Under Armour

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
-4.71%
CRM - HUBS
79%
Closely correlated
-2.10%
TEAM - HUBS
73%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
ASAN - HUBS
70%
Closely correlated
-2.81%
DOCU - HUBS
70%
Closely correlated
-2.09%
BRZE - HUBS
69%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
More

TTAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAN has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTAN jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTAN
1D Price
Change %
TTAN100%
+4.08%
FRSH - TTAN
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.72%
NOW - TTAN
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.04%
CRM - TTAN
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
ADBE - TTAN
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
HUBS - TTAN
63%
Loosely correlated
-4.71%
More