HUBS
Price
$173.40
Change
+$0.60 (+0.35%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.85B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TTAN
Price
$63.94
Change
+$1.37 (+2.19%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:18 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.97B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUBS vs TTAN

HUBS vs TTAN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) vs. ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • HUBS and TTAN both operate in the software application sector, with HUBS focused on CRM and inbound marketing platforms while TTAN targets field service management for contractors.
  • Recent market activity shows both stocks experiencing notable upward price movements amid broader technology sector volatility.
  • Growth drivers differ: HUBS benefits from AI enhancements in customer engagement tools, whereas TTAN capitalizes on demand for specialized operational software in the home services industry.
  • Risk profiles include high valuation multiples for both, with exposure to economic cycles affecting software spending and adoption rates.
  • Market sentiment reflects interest in AI-driven efficiencies, though relative performance depends on earnings execution and sector rotation.
  • Comparative positioning highlights trade-offs between established marketing software scale at HUBS and niche vertical expansion potential at TTAN.

Introduction

This comparison examines HUBS and TTAN to provide traders and investors with a clear view of their relative positioning in the current market environment. Both companies deliver cloud-based software solutions but serve distinct customer segments within the technology sector. Institutional investors, growth-oriented traders, and those evaluating software application stocks may find this analysis relevant for assessing business model differences, recent momentum, and potential portfolio considerations amid evolving market conditions.

HUBS Overview and Recent Performance

HubSpot, Inc. provides a comprehensive customer relationship management (CRM) platform that integrates marketing, sales, and service tools, primarily targeting small to mid-sized businesses. In recent weeks, HUBS has shown resilience in its stock price amid broader market fluctuations, supported by ongoing integration of artificial intelligence features into its product suite. Performance has been influenced by sustained demand for inbound marketing solutions and operational efficiencies reported in quarterly updates. Sentiment remains tied to the company’s ability to expand its subscription base and maintain high customer retention rates in a competitive landscape.

TTAN Overview and Recent Performance

ServiceTitan, Inc. offers an end-to-end cloud-based platform designed for contractors in the home services industry, streamlining operations from scheduling to invoicing. Over recent market activity, TTAN has recorded price appreciation driven by sector-specific tailwinds and expanding adoption among service businesses. Key influences on performance include strong gross margins typical of software platforms and momentum from vertical market penetration. Sentiment reflects optimism around specialized software demand, balanced against the company’s relatively recent public market presence and growth execution metrics.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied styles, strategies, timeframes, and statistical profiles, with only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions featured in the trending section. Available bots demonstrate a range of historical performance metrics, win rates, and drawdown statistics that help users evaluate fit for different risk tolerances. All bots maintain distinct approaches tailored to specific market environments. For more details on current trending options, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

In business model terms, HUBS emphasizes broad horizontal CRM capabilities across marketing and sales functions, while TTAN focuses on vertical-specific tools for field service operations, creating different expansion pathways. Growth drivers contrast with HUBS leveraging AI for general productivity gains and TTAN capitalizing on contractor workflow digitization trends. Recent momentum has favored both amid technology sector recovery, though TTAN exhibits characteristics of a newer listing with potentially higher volatility. Risk factors include valuation sensitivity for growth stocks and exposure to discretionary software spending; HUBS benefits from larger scale and diversified customer base, whereas TTAN carries concentration risk in the home services vertical. Market sentiment positions both as beneficiaries of digital transformation, with relative performance hinging on earnings visibility and macroeconomic influences on technology investment.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent market activity, relative stability of established operations, and positioning within AI-adjacent growth areas, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to HUBS due to its broader market presence and sustained product innovation signals. However, TTAN presents compelling vertical momentum that could narrow this assessment depending on upcoming catalysts and execution metrics. This evaluation remains probabilistic and tied to available data patterns rather than guarantees.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
HUBS vs. TTAN commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a StrongBuy and TTAN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (HUBS: $172.80 vs. TTAN: $62.57)
Brand notoriety: HUBS and TTAN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUBS: 111% vs. TTAN: 75%
Market capitalization -- HUBS: $8.85B vs. TTAN: $5.97B
HUBS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $8.85B. TTAN’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $5.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTAN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TTAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTAN is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUBS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • TTAN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTAN is a better buy in the short-term than HUBS.

Price Growth

HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -7.13% price change this week, while TTAN (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

TTAN is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.58% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($8.85B) has a higher market cap than TTAN($5.97B). TTAN YTD gains are higher at: -41.249 vs. HUBS (-56.940). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 267M vs. TTAN (-44.69M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. TTAN (422M). TTAN has less debt than HUBS: TTAN (51M) vs HUBS (247M). HUBS has higher revenues than TTAN: HUBS (3.3B) vs TTAN (1.01B).
HUBSTTANHUBS / TTAN
Capitalization8.85B5.97B148%
EBITDA267M-44.69M-598%
Gain YTD-56.940-41.249138%
P/E Ratio90.95N/A-
Revenue3.3B1.01B325%
Total Cash1.69B422M401%
Total Debt247M51M484%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUBSTTAN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SRCE77.850.94
+1.22%
1st Source Corp
GLOO4.700.01
+0.21%
Gloo Holdings Inc.
APXTU10.25N/A
N/A
Apex Treasury Corp
LUNG1.27-0.01
-0.78%
Pulmonx Corp
NCLH20.04-0.40
-1.96%
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd

TTAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAN has been loosely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTAN jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTAN
1D Price
Change %
TTAN100%
-2.58%
CRM - TTAN
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
GWRE - TTAN
63%
Loosely correlated
-4.79%
FRSH - TTAN
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
HUBS - TTAN
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
ADBE - TTAN
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
More