This comparison examines HUBS and TTAN to provide traders and investors with a clear view of their relative positioning in the current market environment. Both companies deliver cloud-based software solutions but serve distinct customer segments within the technology sector. Institutional investors, growth-oriented traders, and those evaluating software application stocks may find this analysis relevant for assessing business model differences, recent momentum, and potential portfolio considerations amid evolving market conditions.
HubSpot, Inc. provides a comprehensive customer relationship management (CRM) platform that integrates marketing, sales, and service tools, primarily targeting small to mid-sized businesses. In recent weeks, HUBS has shown resilience in its stock price amid broader market fluctuations, supported by ongoing integration of artificial intelligence features into its product suite. Performance has been influenced by sustained demand for inbound marketing solutions and operational efficiencies reported in quarterly updates. Sentiment remains tied to the company’s ability to expand its subscription base and maintain high customer retention rates in a competitive landscape.
ServiceTitan, Inc. offers an end-to-end cloud-based platform designed for contractors in the home services industry, streamlining operations from scheduling to invoicing. Over recent market activity, TTAN has recorded price appreciation driven by sector-specific tailwinds and expanding adoption among service businesses. Key influences on performance include strong gross margins typical of software platforms and momentum from vertical market penetration. Sentiment reflects optimism around specialized software demand, balanced against the company’s relatively recent public market presence and growth execution metrics.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied styles, strategies, timeframes, and statistical profiles, with only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions featured in the trending section. Available bots demonstrate a range of historical performance metrics, win rates, and drawdown statistics that help users evaluate fit for different risk tolerances. All bots maintain distinct approaches tailored to specific market environments. For more details on current trending options, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
In business model terms, HUBS emphasizes broad horizontal CRM capabilities across marketing and sales functions, while TTAN focuses on vertical-specific tools for field service operations, creating different expansion pathways. Growth drivers contrast with HUBS leveraging AI for general productivity gains and TTAN capitalizing on contractor workflow digitization trends. Recent momentum has favored both amid technology sector recovery, though TTAN exhibits characteristics of a newer listing with potentially higher volatility. Risk factors include valuation sensitivity for growth stocks and exposure to discretionary software spending; HUBS benefits from larger scale and diversified customer base, whereas TTAN carries concentration risk in the home services vertical. Market sentiment positions both as beneficiaries of digital transformation, with relative performance hinging on earnings visibility and macroeconomic influences on technology investment.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent market activity, relative stability of established operations, and positioning within AI-adjacent growth areas, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to HUBS due to its broader market presence and sustained product innovation signals. However, TTAN presents compelling vertical momentum that could narrow this assessment depending on upcoming catalysts and execution metrics. This evaluation remains probabilistic and tied to available data patterns rather than guarantees.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTAN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -7.13% price change this week, while TTAN (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
TTAN is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| HUBS | TTAN | HUBS / TTAN | |
| Capitalization | 8.85B | 5.97B | 148% |
| EBITDA | 267M | -44.69M | -598% |
| Gain YTD | -56.940 | -41.249 | 138% |
| P/E Ratio | 90.95 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.3B | 1.01B | 325% |
| Total Cash | 1.69B | 422M | 401% |
| Total Debt | 247M | 51M | 484% |
HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HUBS | TTAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 74% | 19 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 12 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 38% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAN has been loosely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTAN jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAN | 100% | -2.58% | ||
| CRM - TTAN | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| GWRE - TTAN | 63% Loosely correlated | -4.79% | ||
| FRSH - TTAN | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| HUBS - TTAN | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| ADBE - TTAN | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
More | ||||