NNBR
Price
$2.79
Change
+$0.01 (+0.36%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
147.24M
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ON
Price
$121.62
Change
+$8.70 (+7.70%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
47.29B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NNBR vs ON

NNBR vs ON Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NNBR vs. ON commentary
Jun 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NNBR is a Hold and ON is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 20, 2026
Stock price -- (NNBR: $2.78 vs. ON: $112.92)
Brand notoriety: NNBR: Not notable vs. ON: Notable
NNBR represents the Industrial Conglomerates, while ON is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NNBR: 40% vs. ON: 91%
Market capitalization -- NNBR: $147.24M vs. ON: $47.29B
NNBR [@Industrial Conglomerates] is valued at $147.24M. ON’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $47.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $145.11B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.1T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry is $9.98B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $204.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NNBR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileON’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NNBR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ON’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ON is a better buy in the long-term than NNBR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NNBR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ON’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NNBR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ON’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NNBR and ON are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NNBR (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а -3.47% price change this week, while ON (@Semiconductors) price change was +2.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.63%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +107.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

NNBR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

ON is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Conglomerates (+0.26% weekly)

Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).

@Semiconductors (+5.94% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ON($47.3B) has a higher market cap than NNBR($147M). NNBR YTD gains are higher at: 117.188 vs. ON (108.532). ON has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.52B vs. NNBR (18.1M). ON has more cash in the bank: 2.4B vs. NNBR (8.47M). NNBR has less debt than ON: NNBR (211M) vs ON (3.01B). ON has higher revenues than NNBR: ON (6.06B) vs NNBR (435M).
NNBRONNNBR / ON
Capitalization147M47.3B0%
EBITDA18.1M1.52B1%
Gain YTD117.188108.532108%
P/E RatioN/A89.43-
Revenue435M6.06B7%
Total Cash8.47M2.4B0%
Total Debt211M3.01B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NNBR vs ON: Fundamental Ratings
NNBR
ON
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4475
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10045
SMR RATING
1..100
9980
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
957
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ON's Valuation (62) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as NNBR (76) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that ON’s stock grew similarly to NNBR’s over the last 12 months.

ON's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNBR (100) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that ON’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNBR’s over the last 12 months.

ON's SMR Rating (80) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as NNBR (99) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that ON’s stock grew similarly to NNBR’s over the last 12 months.

ON's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as NNBR (35) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that ON’s stock grew similarly to NNBR’s over the last 12 months.

ON's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for NNBR (95) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that ON’s stock grew significantly faster than NNBR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NNBRON
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NNBR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCDCX30.070.06
+0.20%
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Inv C
AMTOX11.21-0.11
-0.97%
AB All Market Real Return 1
FERAX14.78-0.20
-1.34%
First Eagle Global Real Assets A
JVAYX39.61-0.56
-1.39%
JPMorgan Value Advantage R6
KINAX73.16-1.16
-1.56%
Kinetics Internet Adv A

NNBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NNBR and FIP have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NNBR and FIP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NNBR
1D Price
Change %
NNBR100%
-2.46%
FIP - NNBR
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
BBUC - NNBR
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
WOR - NNBR
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
OTTR - NNBR
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
HON - NNBR
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
More

ON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ON has been closely correlated with MCHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ON jumps, then MCHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ON
1D Price
Change %
ON100%
-4.51%
MCHP - ON
75%
Closely correlated
-1.59%
ENTG - ON
73%
Closely correlated
+3.78%
KLIC - ON
73%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
STM - ON
72%
Closely correlated
-1.60%
MCHPP - ON
72%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
More