Advertisement
ONEW vs PLNT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONEW is a Hold and PLNT is a Hold.
| ONEW | PLNT | ONEW / PLNT | |
| Capitalization | 179M | 3.83B | 5% |
| EBITDA | -73.9M | 616M | -12% |
| Gain YTD | -0.832 | -53.213 | 2% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 17.26 | - |
| Revenue | 1.81B | 1.41B | 129% |
| Total Cash | 68.7M | 401M | 17% |
| Total Debt | 874M | 2.97B | 29% |
ONEW | PLNT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 93 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ONEW's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLNT (70) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that ONEW’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLNT’s over the last 12 months.
ONEW's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PLNT (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that ONEW’s stock grew similarly to PLNT’s over the last 12 months.
PLNT's SMR Rating (12) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ONEW (97) in the null industry. This means that PLNT’s stock grew significantly faster than ONEW’s over the last 12 months.
ONEW's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as PLNT (63) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that ONEW’s stock grew similarly to PLNT’s over the last 12 months.
ONEW's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLNT (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that ONEW’s stock grew significantly faster than PLNT’s over the last 12 months.
| ONEW | PLNT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ONEW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while PLNT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ONEW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PLNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ONEW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLNT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ONEW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PLNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ONEW (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -15.51% price change this week, while PLNT (@Recreational Products) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -4.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.74%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -5.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
ONEW is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
PLNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-4.09% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
@Recreational Products (-5.11% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
Advertisement
ONEW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEW has been loosely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONEW jumps, then AN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONEW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEW | 100% | -2.28% | ||
| AN - ONEW | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| RUSHA - ONEW | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| ABG - ONEW | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| FND - ONEW | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| PAG - ONEW | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||
PLNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLNT has been loosely correlated with LTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLNT jumps, then LTH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLNT | 100% | +1.54% | ||
| LTH - PLNT | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| YETI - PLNT | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.00% | ||
| ONEW - PLNT | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.28% | ||
| AS - PLNT | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.41% | ||
| MSGE - PLNT | 22% Poorly correlated | +4.54% | ||
More | ||||