Advertisement
AN vs ONEW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? AutoNation (AN) vs. OneWater Marine (ONEW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- AutoNation (AN) is the largest automotive retailer in the United States, generating $27.6 billion in full-year 2025 revenue and delivering record after-sales gross profit alongside $1.05 billion in adjusted free cash flow.
- OneWater Marine (ONEW) is a leading recreational boat retailer that outperformed a declining marine industry with 6% same-store sales growth in fiscal 2025, though profitability was pressured by aggressive promotions and a $146 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge.
- AutoNation's diversified revenue streams — including a rapidly scaling in-house finance arm — provide a cushion against cyclical downturns, while OneWater's narrower marine focus makes it more sensitive to discretionary consumer spending trends.
- Both companies have taken decisive portfolio actions: AutoNation has been acquiring dealerships and repurchasing shares aggressively, while OneWater exited underperforming brands and is divesting its distribution segment to sharpen its focus.
- From a balance sheet perspective, AutoNation's investment-grade profile and $1.8 billion in liquidity contrast sharply with OneWater's elevated leverage ratio of 5.1 times trailing adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization).
- Market positioning and scale heavily favor AutoNation, though OneWater's recent margin stabilization and inventory discipline suggest a potential inflection point for the smaller-cap name.
Introduction
Comparing AN and ONEW offers a revealing look at two very different approaches to vehicle retailing — one anchored in the broad, essential automotive market and the other in the more cyclical and discretionary world of recreational boating. This stock comparison may be relevant for investors seeking to understand how scale, sector exposure, and capital allocation discipline shape relative performance in the broader consumer discretionary landscape. While both companies operate dealership networks across the United States, their business models, growth drivers, and risk profiles diverge meaningfully. This analysis examines recent performance, operational momentum, and the structural factors that could influence how these two stocks behave as market conditions evolve.
AN Overview and Recent Performance
AN (AutoNation, Inc.) stands as America's largest automotive retailer, operating over 300 dealership locations concentrated predominantly in Sunbelt states. The company sells new and used vehicles across a broad range of brands and has steadily built a powerful ecosystem of complementary revenue streams, including after-sales service, parts, customer financial services (CFS), and its proprietary AutoNation Finance lending platform.
In recent months, AutoNation demonstrated notable financial resilience. For the fourth quarter of 2025, the company reported revenue of $6.93 billion, a 4% decline year-over-year that reflected softer new-vehicle unit volumes — partly attributable to pull-forward demand earlier in the year tied to tariff concerns and the expiration of battery-electric vehicle incentives. Despite the top-line softness, adjusted diluted EPS (earnings per share) came in at $5.08, exceeding analyst expectations and improving 2% from the prior-year period. For the full fiscal year 2025, adjusted EPS surged 16% to $20.22, supported by record after-sales gross profit, robust CFS profitability, and a 10% reduction in shares outstanding via $785 million in stock repurchases.
AutoNation Finance has emerged as a significant strategic asset. The portfolio surpassed $2.2 billion in size, turned profitable on a full-year basis, and achieved improved funding status through a successful $749 million asset-backed securitization. Meanwhile, the company continued consolidating its footprint through targeted acquisitions — adding Toyota, Audi, Mercedes-Benz, Mazda, and Ford stores representing more than $650 million in combined annual revenue. Management has signaled a cautious outlook for 2026 vehicle sales but expects after-sales growth and cost discipline to sustain margins.
ONEW Overview and Recent Performance
ONEW (OneWater Marine Inc.) is one of the largest recreational boat and marine products retailers in the United States, with a network of nearly 100 dealership locations and multiple distribution centers. The company sells new and pre-owned boats across numerous premium brands, complemented by finance and insurance services, parts, and repair operations.
Recent market activity has highlighted both the operational execution and the financial headwinds facing OneWater. For fiscal year 2025 (ended September 30, 2025), the company generated $1.87 billion in revenue, a 6% increase year-over-year. Same-store sales growth of 6% significantly outpaced broader marine industry trends, where retail unit sales in comparable categories declined by more than 13%. However, profitability metrics told a more challenging story: gross margin contracted 170 basis points to 22.8%, adjusted EBITDA fell 15% to $70 million, and a $146 million non-cash goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge — triggered by a decline in the company's market capitalization relative to book value — pushed the GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) net loss to $116 million for the year.
The company has responded with a strategic overhaul. Management completed the exit from approximately 15 underperforming boat brands, which created temporary margin compression but has since enabled a cleaner inventory position and sharper focus on higher-margin core brands. In the fiscal first quarter of 2026 (ended December 31, 2025), gross margin improved to 23.5%, and management confirmed that inventory aging had meaningfully improved. OneWater also announced plans to divest its Distribution segment, with proceeds expected to be directed toward debt reduction. The company guided for full-year fiscal 2026 revenue between $1.83 billion and $1.93 billion and adjusted EPS of $0.25 to $0.75.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron operates a dynamic ecosystem of hundreds of AI-powered trading bots, each designed to trade thousands of different tickers using distinct strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters. Only a fraction of these bots — those demonstrating the strongest adaptability to prevailing market conditions — earn a place in the curated Trending AI Robots section. This selection showcases bots with a range of performance statistics: some have delivered annualized returns exceeding 40%, while others focus on capital preservation with lower volatility. Each bot comes with fully transparent track records, including win rates, average trade duration, maximum drawdown, and total closed trades, empowering traders to evaluate strategies before committing capital. Whether targeting short-term swing trades or longer-duration positions, investors can explore bots aligned with their objectives. Discover which algorithms are currently positioned for today's market environment by visiting the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The contrast between AN and ONEW begins with scale. AutoNation's $27.6 billion revenue base and $7.4 billion market capitalization dwarf OneWater's $1.9 billion in revenue and sub-$250 million market cap. This size differential carries real implications for liquidity, institutional coverage, and access to capital markets.
Business model diversification is another defining distinction. AutoNation derives revenue from new vehicles, used vehicles, after-sales service, customer financial services, and a growing captive finance arm — a multi-pronged structure that helps stabilize earnings when any single segment softens. OneWater is more concentrated: new and pre-owned boat sales dominate its revenue mix, with service and parts providing a smaller offset. While both companies operate in cyclical consumer industries, the discretionary nature of boat purchases makes OneWater inherently more sensitive to shifts in consumer confidence and interest rates.
On capital allocation, AutoNation's $1.05 billion in adjusted free cash flow enabled aggressive share repurchases and bolt-on acquisitions without straining the balance sheet, where leverage stands at a manageable 2.44 times. OneWater, by contrast, carries net leverage of 5.1 times trailing adjusted EBITDA — a level that limits financial flexibility and makes the company more vulnerable to sustained earnings pressure. The planned Distribution segment divestiture could bring that number down, but balance sheet repair remains a work in progress.
Sentiment and momentum also diverge. AutoNation's adjusted EPS growth and aggressive buyback program have attracted favorable analyst coverage, while OneWater's large non-cash impairment and GAAP losses have kept sentiment cautious despite operational improvements. That said, OneWater's gross margin recovery in the most recent quarter and cleaner inventory position suggest the company may be moving past the most difficult phase of its brand rationalization.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings quality, balance sheet strength, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor AN over ONEW in the current environment. AutoNation's diversified revenue architecture, record-level after-sales and financial services profitability, and substantial free cash flow generation provide a steadier foundation that AI-driven models tend to recognize as statistically favorable. The company's ability to return capital to shareholders at scale while simultaneously investing in growth — without straining its investment-grade balance sheet — reflects a consistency of execution that algorithmic analysis tends to reward. OneWater's margin recovery and inventory discipline represent positive developments, but elevated leverage and a smaller, more cyclical end-market introduce variability that may weigh on risk-adjusted assessments. As always, market conditions evolve, and relative positioning can shift — this assessment reflects a probabilistic viewpoint grounded in current data, not a definitive prediction.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AN is a Hold and ONEW is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileONEW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- ONEW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONEW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ONEW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AN (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +2.03% price change this week, while ONEW (@Specialty Stores) price change was -4.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.89%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.49%.
Reported Earning Dates
AN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
ONEW is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.31% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
@Specialty Stores (+0.78% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| AN | ONEW | AN / ONEW | |
| Capitalization | 7.11B | 204M | 3,484% |
| EBITDA | 1.75B | -73.9M | -2,371% |
| Gain YTD | 2.867 | 13.216 | 22% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.85 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 27.4B | 1.81B | 1,510% |
| Total Cash | 53.3M | 68.7M | 78% |
| Total Debt | 11.3B | 874M | 1,293% |
AN | ONEW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 31 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ONEW's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AN (74) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that ONEW’s stock grew somewhat faster than AN’s over the last 12 months.
AN's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for ONEW (100) in the null industry. This means that AN’s stock grew significantly faster than ONEW’s over the last 12 months.
AN's SMR Rating (31) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for ONEW (98) in the null industry. This means that AN’s stock grew significantly faster than ONEW’s over the last 12 months.
AN's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as ONEW (46) in the null industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to ONEW’s over the last 12 months.
ONEW's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AN (72) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that ONEW’s stock grew somewhat faster than AN’s over the last 12 months.
| AN | ONEW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 5 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
ONEW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEW has been loosely correlated with HZO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONEW jumps, then HZO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONEW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEW | 100% | -1.21% | ||
| HZO - ONEW | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| AN - ONEW | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| RUSHA - ONEW | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| ABG - ONEW | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| FND - ONEW | 51% Loosely correlated | +4.10% | ||
More | ||||