ONEW
Price
$12.25
Change
-$0.15 (-1.21%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
203.56M
101 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RUSHA
Price
$79.79
Change
-$0.14 (-0.18%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
6.17B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ONEW vs RUSHA

ONEW vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) vs. Rush Enterprises Inc. (RUSHA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • OneWater Marine (ONEW) is a recreational boat and yacht retailer with a market capitalization of approximately $218 million, while Rush Enterprises (RUSHA) is the largest commercial vehicle dealership network in North America with a market cap near $6 billion — a roughly 27-fold size difference.
  • ONEW has posted a year-to-date gain of approximately 21% as of late July 2026, but the stock remains down about 15% over the past year, reflecting persistent headwinds in discretionary marine retail.
  • RUSHA has delivered a year-to-date return of roughly 44% and a one-year gain exceeding 42%, supported by strong aftermarket parts and service revenue, dividends, and aggressive share repurchases.
  • ONEW pays no dividend and carries a higher beta of 1.53, signaling greater volatility, while RUSHA pays a steady quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share (approximately 0.99% yield) and has a lower beta of 0.89.
  • Both companies operate in cyclical industries tied to consumer and business spending, but RUSHA benefits from a diversified business model where aftermarket products and services account for roughly 63% of gross profit, providing stability during downturns.
  • ONEW is actively restructuring — exiting underperforming brands, divesting non-core assets, and reducing debt — which may improve margins over time but introduces near-term uncertainty.

Introduction

Investors comparing ONEW and RUSHA are effectively evaluating two distinctly different approaches to vehicle retailing in North America. OneWater Marine operates in the luxury-leaning recreational boating space, where consumer confidence and discretionary spending drive demand. Rush Enterprises, by contrast, sits at the heart of the commercial trucking ecosystem — selling, servicing, and leasing heavy-duty, medium-duty, and light-duty vehicles to businesses that keep supply chains moving. This comparison is relevant for traders and investors seeking to understand how two dealership-focused businesses with very different end-market exposures are performing in the current economic environment, and which one may offer a more compelling risk-reward profile.

ONEW Overview and Recent Performance

OneWater Marine Inc. is one of the largest recreational boat and yacht retailers in the United States, operating approximately 97 retail locations and nine distribution centers across 19 states. The company sells new and pre-owned boats, offers parts and accessories, provides maintenance and repair services, and arranges financing and insurance for customers. In recent weeks, ONEW shares have traded near $13, recovering from a 52-week low of $8.12 but still well below the 52-week high of $17.92. The company's most recent quarterly results reflected an 8.5% year-over-year revenue decline and a wider-than-expected adjusted loss, driven by soft retail demand and the timing shift of a major boat show. Management has been executing a portfolio optimization strategy — exiting select brands, completing the sale of its Ocean Bio-Chem distribution subsidiary, and prioritizing debt reduction. These moves have improved inventory health to levels management describes as the best in years, and gross margins have shown modest improvement. However, macroeconomic uncertainty and weak consumer confidence continue to weigh on sentiment. Analysts maintain a consensus Buy rating with a price target of approximately $13, and the company's next earnings release is scheduled for late July 2026.

RUSHA Overview and Recent Performance

Rush Enterprises Inc. operates the largest network of commercial vehicle dealerships in North America under the Rush Truck Centers brand, with a presence spanning the United States and Ontario, Canada. The company sells new and used commercial vehicles from manufacturers including Peterbilt, International, Hino, Ford, Isuzu, IC Bus, and Blue Bird, while also providing aftermarket parts, service and collision repair, financing, leasing, and rental solutions. In recent market activity, RUSHA has been trading near $77, approaching its 52-week high of $80.17. The company delivered full-year 2025 revenues of $7.4 billion and net income of $263.8 million, or $3.27 per diluted share. The aftermarket segment — parts, service, and collision centers — has proven to be a resilient earnings engine, consistently generating approximately 63% of total gross profit and enabling absorption ratios (a dealership metric where parts and service gross profit covers fixed operating expenses) above 129%. While new Class 8 heavy-duty truck sales remain under pressure from the prolonged freight recession, Rush Enterprises has offset some of that weakness through strength in vocational and public-sector sales, leasing revenue growth, and active capital return programs. In 2025, the company repurchased $193.5 million in stock and paid $58 million in dividends. A new $150 million share repurchase authorization was approved in December 2025, and the quarterly dividend has been raised for nine consecutive periods.

Trending AI Robots

For traders looking to cut through the noise and leverage data-driven decision-making, Trending AI Robots from Tickeron offers a curated marketplace of AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron's platform hosts hundreds of automated trading bots that monitor thousands of tickers across a wide range of sectors, timeframes, and trading styles — from short-term swing trading to longer-term trend-following strategies. The bots in the Trending AI Robots section are selected because they have demonstrated adaptability to current market conditions, with some showcasing annualized return rates and win percentages that stand out in real-time performance tracking. Each bot operates with its own distinct strategy, risk profile, and ticker universe, allowing users to find approaches that align with their own objectives. Whether you are interested in ONEW, RUSHA, or a broader portfolio, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify data-driven tools designed for today's market environment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing ONEW and RUSHA, several key differences stand out beyond the obvious size disparity. From a business model perspective, RUSHA enjoys a structural advantage in revenue stability — its aftermarket service and parts business provides a recurring, non-discretionary revenue stream that cushions the cyclicality of new vehicle sales. ONEW, while diversified across new and pre-owned boats, parts, service, and financing, remains more exposed to discretionary consumer spending, which can deteriorate quickly during periods of economic uncertainty. On the growth and momentum front, RUSHA has demonstrated stronger relative performance across virtually all timeframes — up over 40% in the past year compared to ONEW's decline of roughly 15%. In terms of shareholder returns, RUSHA offers both dividends and aggressive buybacks, while ONEW offers neither, instead focusing capital on debt reduction. Risk profiles also diverge: ONEW carries a beta of 1.53, implying significantly higher volatility, and faces ongoing restructuring risk from brand exits and asset sales. RUSHA, with a beta of 0.89, has historically moved more in line with the broader market. Sector exposure is another important differentiator — ONEW is tied to leisure and luxury spending, while RUSHA is anchored to freight, logistics, and commercial infrastructure demand.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable market data, trend consistency, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor RUSHA in the current environment. Rush Enterprises benefits from multiple tailwinds that an AI model would typically weigh favorably: stronger price momentum across short-, medium-, and long-term timeframes, a diversified and resilient aftermarket revenue base that generates the majority of gross profit, consistent capital returns through dividends and buybacks, a lower volatility profile, and a significantly larger market capitalization that implies greater liquidity and institutional support. While ONEW may appeal to contrarian investors who see value in its restructuring story and depressed valuation, the stock's negative trailing earnings, lack of dividend, higher beta, and ongoing exposure to discretionary spending headwinds introduce uncertainty that an AI model focused on trend consistency and stability would likely discount. That said, this assessment is probabilistic in nature — market conditions can shift, and ONEW's portfolio optimization efforts could yield meaningful upside if consumer confidence recovers and margin expansion materializes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ONEW vs. RUSHA commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONEW is a StrongBuy and RUSHA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (ONEW: $12.25 vs. RUSHA: $79.79)
Brand notoriety: ONEW and RUSHA are both not notable
ONEW represents the Specialty Stores, while RUSHA is part of the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ONEW: 84% vs. RUSHA: 93%
Market capitalization -- ONEW: $203.56M vs. RUSHA: $6.17B
ONEW [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $203.56M. RUSHA’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $6.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $52.32B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $68.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.53B. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $5.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ONEW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ONEW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than ONEW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ONEW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ONEW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the short-term than ONEW.

Price Growth

ONEW (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -4.78% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +4.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.49%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

ONEW is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.78% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.31% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUSHA($6.17B) has a higher market cap than ONEW($204M). RUSHA YTD gains are higher at: 48.703 vs. ONEW (13.216). RUSHA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 640M vs. ONEW (-73.9M). RUSHA has more cash in the bank: 240M vs. ONEW (68.7M). ONEW has less debt than RUSHA: ONEW (874M) vs RUSHA (1.44B). RUSHA has higher revenues than ONEW: RUSHA (7.27B) vs ONEW (1.81B).
ONEWRUSHAONEW / RUSHA
Capitalization204M6.17B3%
EBITDA-73.9M640M-12%
Gain YTD13.21648.70327%
P/E RatioN/A24.03-
Revenue1.81B7.27B25%
Total Cash68.7M240M29%
Total Debt874M1.44B61%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ONEW vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
ONEW
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1009
SMR RATING
1..100
9866
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2116
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHA's Valuation (17) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as ONEW (29) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to ONEW’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for ONEW (100) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew significantly faster than ONEW’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's SMR Rating (66) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as ONEW (98) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to ONEW’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as ONEW (46) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to ONEW’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as ONEW (21) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to ONEW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ONEWRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ONEW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RUSHA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTIR10.110.12
+1.20%
GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF
TIME26.420.17
+0.63%
Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF
GLRY41.260.26
+0.63%
Inspire Growth ETF
TWT.X0.3746280.001323
+0.35%
Trust Wallet Token cryptocurrency
KORP45.87-0.06
-0.13%
American Century Dvrs Corp Bd ETF

ONEW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEW has been loosely correlated with HZO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONEW jumps, then HZO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONEW
1D Price
Change %
ONEW100%
-1.21%
HZO - ONEW
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
AN - ONEW
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
RUSHA - ONEW
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
ABG - ONEW
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
FND - ONEW
51%
Loosely correlated
+4.10%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
-0.18%
RUSHB - RUSHA
86%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
ONEW - RUSHA
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
HVT - RUSHA
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
HZO - RUSHA
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
AN - RUSHA
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
More