Investors comparing ONEW and RUSHA are effectively evaluating two distinctly different approaches to vehicle retailing in North America. OneWater Marine operates in the luxury-leaning recreational boating space, where consumer confidence and discretionary spending drive demand. Rush Enterprises, by contrast, sits at the heart of the commercial trucking ecosystem — selling, servicing, and leasing heavy-duty, medium-duty, and light-duty vehicles to businesses that keep supply chains moving. This comparison is relevant for traders and investors seeking to understand how two dealership-focused businesses with very different end-market exposures are performing in the current economic environment, and which one may offer a more compelling risk-reward profile.
OneWater Marine Inc. is one of the largest recreational boat and yacht retailers in the United States, operating approximately 97 retail locations and nine distribution centers across 19 states. The company sells new and pre-owned boats, offers parts and accessories, provides maintenance and repair services, and arranges financing and insurance for customers. In recent weeks, ONEW shares have traded near $13, recovering from a 52-week low of $8.12 but still well below the 52-week high of $17.92. The company's most recent quarterly results reflected an 8.5% year-over-year revenue decline and a wider-than-expected adjusted loss, driven by soft retail demand and the timing shift of a major boat show. Management has been executing a portfolio optimization strategy — exiting select brands, completing the sale of its Ocean Bio-Chem distribution subsidiary, and prioritizing debt reduction. These moves have improved inventory health to levels management describes as the best in years, and gross margins have shown modest improvement. However, macroeconomic uncertainty and weak consumer confidence continue to weigh on sentiment. Analysts maintain a consensus Buy rating with a price target of approximately $13, and the company's next earnings release is scheduled for late July 2026.
Rush Enterprises Inc. operates the largest network of commercial vehicle dealerships in North America under the Rush Truck Centers brand, with a presence spanning the United States and Ontario, Canada. The company sells new and used commercial vehicles from manufacturers including Peterbilt, International, Hino, Ford, Isuzu, IC Bus, and Blue Bird, while also providing aftermarket parts, service and collision repair, financing, leasing, and rental solutions. In recent market activity, RUSHA has been trading near $77, approaching its 52-week high of $80.17. The company delivered full-year 2025 revenues of $7.4 billion and net income of $263.8 million, or $3.27 per diluted share. The aftermarket segment — parts, service, and collision centers — has proven to be a resilient earnings engine, consistently generating approximately 63% of total gross profit and enabling absorption ratios (a dealership metric where parts and service gross profit covers fixed operating expenses) above 129%. While new Class 8 heavy-duty truck sales remain under pressure from the prolonged freight recession, Rush Enterprises has offset some of that weakness through strength in vocational and public-sector sales, leasing revenue growth, and active capital return programs. In 2025, the company repurchased $193.5 million in stock and paid $58 million in dividends. A new $150 million share repurchase authorization was approved in December 2025, and the quarterly dividend has been raised for nine consecutive periods.
For traders looking to cut through the noise and leverage data-driven decision-making, Trending AI Robots from Tickeron offers a curated marketplace of AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron's platform hosts hundreds of automated trading bots that monitor thousands of tickers across a wide range of sectors, timeframes, and trading styles — from short-term swing trading to longer-term trend-following strategies. The bots in the Trending AI Robots section are selected because they have demonstrated adaptability to current market conditions, with some showcasing annualized return rates and win percentages that stand out in real-time performance tracking. Each bot operates with its own distinct strategy, risk profile, and ticker universe, allowing users to find approaches that align with their own objectives. Whether you are interested in ONEW, RUSHA, or a broader portfolio, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify data-driven tools designed for today's market environment.
When comparing ONEW and RUSHA, several key differences stand out beyond the obvious size disparity. From a business model perspective, RUSHA enjoys a structural advantage in revenue stability — its aftermarket service and parts business provides a recurring, non-discretionary revenue stream that cushions the cyclicality of new vehicle sales. ONEW, while diversified across new and pre-owned boats, parts, service, and financing, remains more exposed to discretionary consumer spending, which can deteriorate quickly during periods of economic uncertainty. On the growth and momentum front, RUSHA has demonstrated stronger relative performance across virtually all timeframes — up over 40% in the past year compared to ONEW's decline of roughly 15%. In terms of shareholder returns, RUSHA offers both dividends and aggressive buybacks, while ONEW offers neither, instead focusing capital on debt reduction. Risk profiles also diverge: ONEW carries a beta of 1.53, implying significantly higher volatility, and faces ongoing restructuring risk from brand exits and asset sales. RUSHA, with a beta of 0.89, has historically moved more in line with the broader market. Sector exposure is another important differentiator — ONEW is tied to leisure and luxury spending, while RUSHA is anchored to freight, logistics, and commercial infrastructure demand.
Based on observable market data, trend consistency, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor RUSHA in the current environment. Rush Enterprises benefits from multiple tailwinds that an AI model would typically weigh favorably: stronger price momentum across short-, medium-, and long-term timeframes, a diversified and resilient aftermarket revenue base that generates the majority of gross profit, consistent capital returns through dividends and buybacks, a lower volatility profile, and a significantly larger market capitalization that implies greater liquidity and institutional support. While ONEW may appeal to contrarian investors who see value in its restructuring story and depressed valuation, the stock's negative trailing earnings, lack of dividend, higher beta, and ongoing exposure to discretionary spending headwinds introduce uncertainty that an AI model focused on trend consistency and stability would likely discount. That said, this assessment is probabilistic in nature — market conditions can shift, and ONEW's portfolio optimization efforts could yield meaningful upside if consumer confidence recovers and margin expansion materializes.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ONEW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ONEW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ONEW (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -4.78% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +4.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.49%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.89%.
ONEW is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.31% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| ONEW | RUSHA | ONEW / RUSHA | |
| Capitalization | 204M | 6.17B | 3% |
| EBITDA | -73.9M | 640M | -12% |
| Gain YTD | 13.216 | 48.703 | 27% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 24.03 | - |
| Revenue | 1.81B | 7.27B | 25% |
| Total Cash | 68.7M | 240M | 29% |
| Total Debt | 874M | 1.44B | 61% |
ONEW | RUSHA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSHA's Valuation (17) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as ONEW (29) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to ONEW’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for ONEW (100) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew significantly faster than ONEW’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's SMR Rating (66) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as ONEW (98) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to ONEW’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as ONEW (46) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to ONEW’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as ONEW (21) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to ONEW’s over the last 12 months.
| ONEW | RUSHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 65% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PTIR | 10.11 | 0.12 | +1.20% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | |||
| TIME | 26.42 | 0.17 | +0.63% |
| Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF | |||
| GLRY | 41.26 | 0.26 | +0.63% |
| Inspire Growth ETF | |||
| TWT.X | 0.374628 | 0.001323 | +0.35% |
| Trust Wallet Token cryptocurrency | |||
| KORP | 45.87 | -0.06 | -0.13% |
| American Century Dvrs Corp Bd ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEW has been loosely correlated with HZO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONEW jumps, then HZO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONEW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEW | 100% | -1.21% | ||
| HZO - ONEW | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| AN - ONEW | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| RUSHA - ONEW | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| ABG - ONEW | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| FND - ONEW | 51% Loosely correlated | +4.10% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| RUSHB - RUSHA | 86% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| ONEW - RUSHA | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| HVT - RUSHA | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| HZO - RUSHA | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| AN - RUSHA | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
More | ||||