Advertisement
PAAS vs RGLD
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Pan American Silver (PAAS) vs. Royal Gold (RGLD) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) trades at a lower trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 20.24 versus Royal Gold, Inc.'s (RGLD) 34.47, indicating potentially better relative valuation.
- PAAS offers a higher dividend yield of 1.04% compared to RGLD's 0.82%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- Year-to-date, RGLD has outperformed PAAS slightly with 4.14% gains versus 1.41%, amid stable precious metals demand.
- PAAS exhibits higher volatility with a beta of 1.49, while RGLD's beta of 0.44 signals lower market sensitivity.
- Recent quarterly revenue growth stands at 44.70% for PAAS and 86.10% for RGLD, highlighting divergent momentum drivers.
Introduction
Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) represent distinct approaches within the precious metals sector: PAAS as a primary silver producer and RGLD as a streaming and royalty company focused on gold and silver. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for traders navigating volatility in metals markets and investors seeking exposure to silver and gold amid economic uncertainty. By examining recent performance, financial metrics, and market positioning, readers can assess relative strengths in growth potential, risk profiles, and sector trends for informed portfolio decisions.
PAAS Overview and Recent Performance
Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) is a leading silver producer with mining operations across the Americas, benefiting from diversified assets in silver, gold, and base metals. In recent market activity, shares have experienced pullbacks from 52-week highs near $70, influenced by silver price fluctuations and broader commodity sentiment. Key developments include record fourth-quarter 2025 results with $1.18 billion in revenue and $470 million in earnings, alongside strong cash flow from operations reaching $554 million for the year. Growth catalysts such as the MAG Silver deal and discoveries at La Colorada mine have bolstered sentiment, with analysts like Scotiabank raising price targets to $65. Quarterly revenue grew 44.70% year-over-year, though shares reflect heightened volatility tied to operational execution.
RGLD Overview and Recent Performance
Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) operates as a precious metals streaming and royalty company, acquiring production percentages from mining operations without direct operational risks or capital expenditures. Recent weeks have seen shares consolidate after swings, supported by a low beta of 0.44 and steady gold exposure. The company issued 2026 guidance projecting 290,000-320,000 ounces of gold equivalent sales, signaling production growth. First-quarter 2026 results are slated for release soon, following quarterly revenue growth of 86.10% year-over-year. Positive analyst coverage positions RGLD among top long-term gold stocks, with emphasis on royalty advantages amid rising mining costs.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, selecting those best suited to current market conditions across sectors like gold miners, semiconductors, and ETFs. These bots employ diverse strategies—ranging from short-term 15-minute scalps to multi-day holds—showcasing impressive stats such as annualized returns up to +163%, win rates of 60-75%, profit factors from 1.5 to 3.3, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 9 in some cases. Each provides detailed equity curves, trade histories, and risk metrics for copy trading via virtual or brokerage agents. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligning with your timeframe and risk tolerance.
Head-to-Head Comparison
PAAS and RGLD differ fundamentally: PAAS as an operating miner faces production costs and exploration risks, while RGLD's royalty model delivers high-margin cash flows with minimal capex. Growth drivers for PAAS include mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and mine expansions, contrasting RGLD's portfolio of streams. Recent momentum favors PAAS with explosive earnings growth, but RGLD offers superior stability. Risk factors highlight PAAS's silver-heavy exposure and high beta versus RGLD's diversified gold royalties. Market sentiment remains constructive for both amid precious metals rallies.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI analysis leans toward RGLD in the current environment, citing its lower beta for stability, favorable long-term buy rating, and resilient royalty model amid cost pressures on miners. While PAAS shows strong trend consistency from recent records, RGLD's relative positioning and growth outlook provide a probabilistic edge for conservative positioning.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAAS is a Hold and RGLD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PAAS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RGLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PAAS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGLD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PAAS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RGLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
PAAS (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.63% price change this week, while RGLD (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
RGLD is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-0.28% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| PAAS | RGLD | PAAS / RGLD | |
| Capitalization | 23.9B | 19.4B | 123% |
| EBITDA | 2.22B | 1.03B | 214% |
| Gain YTD | 9.145 | 3.118 | 293% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.79 | 27.61 | 64% |
| Revenue | 4B | 1.31B | 306% |
| Total Cash | 1.61B | 234M | 690% |
| Total Debt | 845M | 596M | 142% |
PAAS | RGLD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAAS's Valuation (17) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RGLD (18). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.
RGLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (43). This means that RGLD’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's SMR Rating (45) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RGLD (64). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RGLD (59). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.
RGLD's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (82). This means that RGLD’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
| PAAS | RGLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BREM | 51.43 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF | |||
| AUSM | 25.05 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF | |||
| GBAB | 13.78 | -0.20 | -1.46% |
| Guggenheim Taxable Municipal | |||
| RXL | 44.47 | -0.99 | -2.18% |
| ProShares Ultra Health Care | |||
| REMX | 96.57 | -3.28 | -3.28% |
| VanEck Rare Earth & Strat Mtls ETF | |||