Advertisement
OR vs RGLD
Which Stock Would AI Choose? OR Royalties Inc. (OR) vs. Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both OR and RGLD provide leveraged exposure to precious metals prices through royalties and streams, minimizing direct mining operational risks.
- RGLD boasts a larger market capitalization of approximately $19.6 billion compared to OR's $6.9 billion, reflecting greater scale.
- Year-to-date performance shows RGLD up 4.14% versus OR's 2.24%, amid rising gold prices.
- OR delivered stronger one-year returns of 57.11%, outperforming RGLD's 30.62%.
- Recent portfolio updates for both highlight positive asset developments, with RGLD reporting record 2025 revenues.
- Dividend yields are modest, at 0.60% for OR and 0.82% for RGLD, appealing to income-focused investors.
Introduction
In the volatile precious metals sector, royalty and streaming companies like OR Royalties Inc. (OR) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) offer investors indirect exposure to gold and silver prices without the operational risks of mining. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market performance, business models, and key metrics amid favorable gold price trends. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing sector stability will find value in understanding their relative positioning, growth drivers, and risk profiles in today's market environment.
OR Overview and Recent Performance
OR Royalties Inc., formerly Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd, acquires and manages precious metal royalties, streams, and related interests, with a flagship 3-5% net smelter return (NSR) royalty on the Canadian Malartic complex. Headquartered in Montreal, the company focuses on gold, silver, and other metals across Canada and internationally. In recent market activity, OR shares have traded around $37-$42, with a year-to-date gain of 2.24% and impressive one-year returns of 57.11%. Positive sentiment stems from a recent portfolio update highlighting advancements at assets like Island Gold, Dalgaranga, and Eagle, alongside a strategic sale of its Osisko Metals stake for US$34.8 million, bolstering liquidity. These developments have supported steady price action despite broader sector fluctuations.
RGLD Overview and Recent Performance
Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD), based in Denver, acquires and manages precious metal streams and royalties globally, financing mining projects in exchange for metal percentages. Its portfolio spans gold, silver, copper, and others across production and development stages. Shares recently hovered near $231, reflecting year-to-date gains of 4.14% and one-year returns of 30.62%, with a market cap exceeding $19 billion. Recent performance has been buoyed by record fiscal 2025 revenues of $1.03 billion, including $375 million in Q4, driven by strong stream sales and asset rationalization. Analyst upgrades and anticipation for Q1 2026 results have enhanced market sentiment, amid elevated gold prices.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 available bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots, tailored to current market conditions, feature diverse strategies like swing trading semiconductors, data centers, gold miners, and volatility plays, with annualized returns ranging from +23.53% to +163.10%, win rates of 51.30% to 88.33%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Some focus on precious metals miners, offering signals for copy trading via virtual or brokerage agents. Explore these high-conviction options to enhance your trading edge.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both OR and RGLD employ similar business models—royalties and streams for low-cost metal exposure—but RGLD's larger scale provides broader diversification, including copper, versus OR's emphasis on Canadian gold assets. Growth drivers hinge on gold prices and partner mine production; recent weeks show RGLD with superior YTD momentum, while OR excels in one-year gains. Risk factors include commodity volatility and counterparty production shortfalls, with RGLD's higher PE ratio (34.47 vs. 33.69) signaling premium valuation. Market sentiment favors RGLD amid analyst optimism, contrasting OR's portfolio-focused updates.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward RGLD for its trend consistency, record revenue trajectory, larger portfolio scale, and positive analyst momentum in recent market activity. While OR shows strong longer-term relative performance, RGLD's stability and upcoming catalysts position it favorably in the near term, though both benefit from gold's upward trajectory.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OR is a Hold and RGLD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- OR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RGLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGLD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- OR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RGLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
OR (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.21% price change this week, while RGLD (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
RGLD is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-0.28% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| OR | RGLD | OR / RGLD | |
| Capitalization | 6.85B | 19.4B | 35% |
| EBITDA | 339M | 1.03B | 33% |
| Gain YTD | 3.071 | 3.118 | 99% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.18 | 27.61 | 98% |
| Revenue | 325M | 1.31B | 25% |
| Total Cash | 94.9M | 234M | 41% |
| Total Debt | 4.64M | 596M | 1% |
OR | RGLD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RGLD's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OR (78) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than OR’s over the last 12 months.
OR's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLD (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that OR’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.
OR's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLD (64) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that OR’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.
OR's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLD (53) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that OR’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.
RGLD's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OR (99) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than OR’s over the last 12 months.
| OR | RGLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FXC | 71.05 | -0.15 | -0.21% |
| Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar | |||
| RAUS | 28.85 | -0.35 | -1.21% |
| RACWI US ETF | |||
| USSE | 38.78 | -0.48 | -1.22% |
| Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF | |||
| DSPY | 63.30 | -0.79 | -1.23% |
| Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF | |||
| FTXL | 234.54 | -9.30 | -3.81% |
| First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | |||
OR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OR has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OR jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.