PAG
Price
$160.63
Change
+$4.79 (+3.07%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
10.58B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SVV
Price
$8.35
Change
+$0.45 (+5.70%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAG vs SVV

Header iconPAG vs SVV Comparison
Open Charts PAG vs SVVBanner chart's image
Penske Automotive Group
Price$160.63
Change+$4.79 (+3.07%)
Volume$317.74K
Capitalization10.58B
Savers Value Village
Price$8.35
Change+$0.45 (+5.70%)
Volume$1.14M
Capitalization1.3B
PAG vs SVV Comparison Chart in %
PAG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAG vs. SVV commentary
Nov 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAG is a Hold and SVV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2025
Stock price -- (PAG: $160.63 vs. SVV: $8.35)
Brand notoriety: PAG and SVV are both not notable
PAG represents the Automotive Aftermarket, while SVV is part of the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAG: 118% vs. SVV: 67%
Market capitalization -- PAG: $10.58B vs. SVV: $1.3B
PAG [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $10.58B. SVV’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $43.82B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $48.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.65B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $3.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSVV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SVV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than SVV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SVV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the short-term than SVV.

Price Growth

PAG (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +0.97% price change this week, while SVV (@Specialty Stores) price change was +2.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.50%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAG is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

SVV is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (+0.45% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

@Specialty Stores (-2.17% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($10.6B) has a higher market cap than SVV($1.3B). SVV has higher P/E ratio than PAG: SVV (66.15) vs PAG (11.31). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 8.712 vs. SVV (-18.537). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.71B vs. SVV (146M). PAG has more cash in the bank: 80.3M vs. SVV (63.5M). SVV has less debt than PAG: SVV (1.37B) vs PAG (7.93B). PAG has higher revenues than SVV: PAG (30.7B) vs SVV (1.62B).
PAGSVVPAG / SVV
Capitalization10.6B1.3B813%
EBITDA1.71B146M1,173%
Gain YTD8.712-18.537-47%
P/E Ratio11.3166.1517%
Revenue30.7B1.62B1,900%
Total Cash80.3M63.5M126%
Total Debt7.93B1.37B581%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAG: Fundamental Ratings
PAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8
SMR RATING
1..100
48
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAGSVV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DCGVX42.710.56
+1.33%
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund C
AMINX71.55N/A
N/A
Amana Income Institutional
LKSMX11.33N/A
N/A
LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Institutional
POPFX28.26N/A
N/A
Prospector Opportunity
MIOLX27.29N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst International Opp L

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
+3.07%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
+2.94%
AN - PAG
80%
Closely correlated
+4.39%
SAH - PAG
78%
Closely correlated
+3.60%
ABG - PAG
78%
Closely correlated
+5.68%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
+5.21%
More

SVV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVV has been loosely correlated with HVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVV jumps, then HVT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVV
1D Price
Change %
SVV100%
+5.70%
HVT - SVV
38%
Loosely correlated
+3.81%
GPI - SVV
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.94%
LOW - SVV
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
HD - SVV
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.29%
ABG - SVV
35%
Loosely correlated
+5.68%
More