PAG
Price
$157.53
Change
+$1.93 (+1.24%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
42 days until earnings call
SVV
Price
$10.25
Change
-$0.19 (-1.82%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
72 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PAG vs SVV

Header iconPAG vs SVV Comparison
Open Charts PAG vs SVVBanner chart's image
Penske Automotive Group
Price$157.53
Change+$1.93 (+1.24%)
Volume$47.14K
CapitalizationN/A
Savers Value Village
Price$10.25
Change-$0.19 (-1.82%)
Volume$147.11K
CapitalizationN/A
PAG vs SVV Comparison Chart
Loading...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAG vs. SVV commentary
Dec 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAG is a StrongBuy and SVV is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2024
Stock price -- (PAG: $157.53 vs. SVV: $10.25)
Brand notoriety: PAG and SVV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAG: 29% vs. SVV: 21%
Market capitalization -- PAG: $10.86B vs. SVV: $3.12B
PAG [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $10.86B. SVV’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $3.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSVV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SVV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than SVV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SVV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVV is a better buy in the short-term than PAG.

Price Growth

PAG (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -2.61% price change this week, while SVV (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAG is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

SVV is expected to report earnings on Mar 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.09% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($10.9B) has a higher market cap than SVV($3.12B). SVV has higher P/E ratio than PAG: SVV (56.82) vs PAG (10.37). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 0.709 vs. SVV (-41.024). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.79B vs. SVV (202M). SVV has more cash in the bank: 180M vs. PAG (96.4M). SVV has less debt than PAG: SVV (1.29B) vs PAG (7.74B). PAG has higher revenues than SVV: PAG (29.5B) vs SVV (1.5B).
PAGSVVPAG / SVV
Capitalization10.9B3.12B350%
EBITDA1.79B202M884%
Gain YTD0.709-41.024-2%
P/E Ratio10.3756.8218%
Revenue29.5B1.5B1,967%
Total Cash96.4M180M54%
Total Debt7.74B1.29B601%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAG: Fundamental Ratings
PAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAGSVV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMOM59.780.62
+1.04%
JPMorgan US Momentum Factor ETF
VYM128.991.22
+0.95%
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
STNC30.770.15
+0.49%
Hennessy Stance ESG ETF
BSJS21.800.06
+0.28%
Invesco BulletShares 2028 HY Corp Bd ETF
FLAX23.07N/A
N/A
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
+1.24%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
ABG - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
SAH - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
AN - PAG
80%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
More

SVV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVV has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVV jumps, then RH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVV
1D Price
Change %
SVV100%
-1.82%
RH - SVV
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
ONEW - SVV
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
EYE - SVV
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
CWH - SVV
33%
Loosely correlated
+2.03%
PAG - SVV
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
More