PANW
Price
$394.90
Change
-$2.41 (-0.61%)
Updated
Oct 1, 11:19 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
320.73B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TENB
Price
$35.78
Change
-$0.61 (-1.68%)
Updated
Oct 1, 12:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.8B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PANW vs TENB

PANW vs TENB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 14, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Palo Alto Networks (PANW) vs. Tenable Holdings (TENB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Palo Alto Networks (PANW) reported fiscal 2026 revenue of $11.5 billion, up 24% year over year, with next-generation security annual recurring revenue growing at approximately 60%.
  • Tenable Holdings (TENB) posted second-quarter 2026 revenue of $268.5 million, up 8.6% year over year, and raised full-year guidance amid steady exposure management demand.
  • Recent market activity shows PANW shares trading near $330 with a year-to-date gain of roughly 80%, while TENB shares hover near $30 with year-to-date gains near 28% but sharper recent-month declines.
  • PANW benefits from scale, platformization, and AI-driven acquisitions such as Console, whereas TENB emphasizes specialized exposure management and partnerships including OpenAI integration.
  • Both companies operate in the cybersecurity sector with exposure to artificial intelligence risks, though PANW maintains a significantly larger market capitalization and revenue base.
  • Market sentiment reflects volatility in both names following earnings, with analysts maintaining generally positive ratings amid broader sector interest in AI security solutions.

Introduction

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) and Tenable Holdings (TENB) represent two distinct approaches within the cybersecurity industry, making them relevant for comparison by institutional investors, growth-oriented traders, and portfolio managers seeking exposure to digital defense amid rising artificial intelligence threats. PANW offers a broad platform spanning network, cloud, and endpoint security, while TENB specializes in exposure management and vulnerability assessment. This analysis examines their business models, recent financial results, and relative stock performance in the current market environment to help market participants evaluate positioning, risk factors, and momentum without providing investment recommendations.

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) Overview and Recent Performance

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) delivers enterprise cybersecurity solutions focused on network security, cloud protection, and identity management. In recent weeks, the company reported fiscal fourth-quarter 2026 results with revenue reaching $3.41 billion, representing 34% year-over-year growth and exceeding analyst expectations. Full-year revenue totaled $11.5 billion, up 24%. Next-generation security annual recurring revenue expanded substantially, supported by AI-fueled demand and the integration of recent acquisitions. The stock has experienced volatility, trading near $330 following a pullback from higher levels, yet maintains strong year-to-date gains near 80%. Factors influencing sentiment include the company’s addition to the S&P 100 and its acquisition of Console to enhance agentic AI security capabilities.

Tenable Holdings (TENB) Overview and Recent Performance

Tenable Holdings (TENB) provides exposure management and vulnerability assessment platforms designed to help organizations identify and mitigate cyber risks across IT and operational technology environments. In recent market activity, the company delivered second-quarter 2026 revenue of $268.5 million, an 8.6% increase year over year, and raised its full-year outlook. Non-GAAP earnings per share reached $0.51. The stock trades near $30, reflecting year-to-date gains of approximately 28% alongside notable recent-month declines. Developments shaping performance include the launch of an AI Inspector tool in collaboration with OpenAI and participation in initiatives such as the White House Project Watershed. Management continues to highlight platform adoption and operational efficiencies.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots drawn from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions receive placement in the trending section. Available bots exhibit a wide range of historical win rates, drawdown statistics, and return profiles, allowing users to explore options suited to different risk tolerances and trading horizons. The section provides transparent access to performance data and configuration details for informed evaluation.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) operates a diversified cybersecurity platform with substantial scale, while Tenable Holdings (TENB) maintains a focused exposure management franchise. PANW’s larger revenue base and next-generation security growth contrast with TENB’s more modest expansion rates. Recent momentum favors PANW through platformization and AI acquisitions, whereas TENB emphasizes specialized tools and partnerships. Risk factors for PANW include integration challenges from acquisitions and valuation sensitivity; TENB faces competitive pressures in a consolidating sector and slower growth trajectory. Both companies benefit from sector tailwinds tied to artificial intelligence threats, yet PANW offers broader market exposure while TENB provides targeted vulnerability solutions.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in next-generation security metrics, earnings beats, and relative positioning within the AI security theme, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a probabilistic preference to Palo Alto Networks (PANW) over Tenable Holdings (TENB). The larger company demonstrates stronger revenue momentum and platform breadth that align with prevailing market drivers, though both names carry sector-specific risks and volatility.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PANW vs. TENB commentary
Oct 01, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PANW is a StrongBuy and TENB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PANW vs TENB: Fundamental Ratings
PANW
TENB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3074
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4100
SMR RATING
1..100
8988
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
233
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TENB's Valuation (95) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PANW (99) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that TENB’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for TENB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than TENB’s over the last 12 months.

TENB's SMR Rating (88) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PANW (89) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that TENB’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Price Growth Rating (9) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as TENB (40) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to TENB’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as TENB (33) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to TENB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PANWTENB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 01, 2026
Stock price -- (PANW: $397.31 vs. TENB: $36.39)
Brand notoriety: PANW: Notable vs. TENB: Not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PANW: 104% vs. TENB: 104%
Market capitalization -- PANW: $320.73B vs. TENB: $3.8B
PANW [@Computer Communications] is valued at $320.73B. TENB’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $3.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $48.8K to $3.78T. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $35.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PANW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while TENB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PANW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TENB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PANW is a better buy in the long-term than TENB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PANW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TENB’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PANW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TENB’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TENB is a better buy in the short-term than PANW.

Price Growth

PANW (@Computer Communications) experienced а +1.02% price change this week, while TENB (@Computer Communications) price change was +0.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -3.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

PANW is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.

TENB is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-3.76% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
PANW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TENB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QSU3.980.07
+1.79%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF (QSU)
VTES98.600.52
+0.53%
Vanguard Short-Term Tax Exempt Bond ETF (VTES)
NCIQ15.90N/A
N/A
Hashdex Nasdaq CME Crypto Index ETF
IPO52.62-0.29
-0.55%
Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO)
EURL42.04-1.82
-4.15%
Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3X ETF (EURL)

PANW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PANW
1D Price
Change %
PANW100%
+2.29%
CRWD - PANW
85%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
FTNT - PANW
76%
Closely correlated
+1.59%
OKTA - PANW
70%
Closely correlated
+2.06%
TENB - PANW
63%
Loosely correlated
+4.00%
RBRK - PANW
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
More