Advertisement
QCMU vs QCOM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCMU is a Hold and QCOM is a StrongBuy.
QCOM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| QCMU | QCOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 18 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FDLS | 43.94 | 0.43 | +0.99% |
| Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | |||
| ISEP | 35.50 | 0.04 | +0.12% |
| Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Sept | |||
| GII | 75.08 | 0.04 | +0.05% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P® Glbl Infras ETF | |||
| MYCL | 24.39 | -0.05 | -0.20% |
| State Street® My2032 Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| GOVT | 22.46 | -0.06 | -0.24% |
| iShares US Treasury Bond ETF | |||
QCMU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCMU has been closely correlated with QCOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 98% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCMU jumps, then QCOM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCMU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCMU | 100% | +0.95% | ||
| QCOM - QCMU | 98% Closely correlated | +0.61% |
QCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| LRCX - QCOM | 80% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| KLAC - QCOM | 78% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| AMKR - QCOM | 76% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| AMAT - QCOM | 74% Closely correlated | -5.12% | ||
| KLIC - QCOM | 74% Closely correlated | +3.43% | ||
More | ||||