QQQ
Price
$718.96
Change
+$1.29 (+0.18%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
489.55B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QQQA
Price
$68.31
Change
+$0.74 (+1.10%)
Updated
Sep 4, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
51.11M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QQQ vs QQQA

QQQ vs QQQA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) vs. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA)

Key Takeaways

  • Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) provides broad, passive exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index with approximately 103 holdings, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) uses an active momentum strategy to concentrate in just 21 stocks selected via Dorsey Wright Relative Strength signals.
  • Both ETFs maintain heavy technology sector exposure but differ significantly in diversification and cost: QQQ carries a low 0.18% expense ratio compared to QQQA's 0.58%.
  • QQQ offers greater liquidity and broader market-cap representation across leading non-financial Nasdaq companies, whereas QQQA targets higher-momentum names for potentially enhanced returns in favorable trend environments.
  • Sector allocations in both remain concentrated in technology and consumer discretionary areas, though QQQA's equal-weighted momentum approach can shift exposures more dynamically than QQQ's market-cap weighting.
  • Structural differences position QQQ as a core long-term holding and QQQA as a tactical overlay for investors seeking momentum-driven alpha within the same thematic universe.
  • Investors comparing these ETFs should weigh QQQ's cost efficiency and scale against QQQA's focused momentum methodology and higher expense structure.

Introduction

Investors seeking Nasdaq-100 exposure now face a choice between the established passive benchmark QQQ and the momentum-focused QQQA. These ETFs do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they represent complementary yet distinct strategies within the technology-heavy growth equity space. QQQ delivers comprehensive market-cap-weighted access to the 100 largest non-financial Nasdaq-listed companies, while QQQA applies a rules-based momentum overlay to narrow that universe. The comparison helps clarify trade-offs in cost, diversification, and tactical positioning amid ongoing sector rotation and innovation-driven market cycles.

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) Overview

QQQ is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index. The fund holds approximately 103 securities, with top holdings including NVIDIA Corp, Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Micron Technology Inc, and Amazon.com Inc. Sector allocations emphasize technology at roughly 66%, followed by consumer discretionary at 17%, telecommunications, health care, and industrials. The expense ratio stands at 0.18%. As a unit investment trust structure, QQQ rebalances in line with index changes and maintains high liquidity through one of the most actively traded equity ETFs. Its distinguishing feature is broad, rules-based exposure to innovative large-cap growth companies without active stock selection.

ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) Overview

QQQA employs an active momentum strategy to select the 21 Nasdaq-100 constituents exhibiting the strongest Relative Strength signals according to Dorsey Wright methodology. The fund typically holds around 21-22 positions on an equal-weighted basis, with recent top holdings including DoorDash Inc Class A, Axon Enterprise Inc, Palo Alto Networks Inc, CSX Corp, and Ross Stores Inc. Sector exposure remains concentrated in technology and related growth areas but can rotate based on momentum signals. The expense ratio is 0.58%. Launched in 2021, QQQA rebalances periodically according to its proprietary index rules and offers a more concentrated, trend-responsive profile than broad-market alternatives.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the technology and growth equity themes that dominate Nasdaq-100 constituents. Key macro drivers include artificial intelligence adoption, semiconductor demand, cloud computing expansion, and regulatory scrutiny of large technology platforms. Capital flows into innovation sectors have remained resilient across recent market cycles, supported by earnings growth in leading companies and evolving interest-rate expectations. Risks include valuation compression in high-growth names, potential shifts in monetary policy, supply-chain disruptions, and geopolitical tensions affecting global technology supply. The environment favors strategies that can adapt to momentum shifts while maintaining core exposure to secular growth trends.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent weeks and months, QQQ has delivered steady participation in broad Nasdaq-100 advances driven by earnings cycles in mega-cap technology leaders. Its market-cap weighting emphasizes scale and stability. In contrast, QQQA's momentum selection has produced more variable results, with stronger outperformance during periods of clear leadership rotation and underperformance when momentum signals weaken. Relative positioning shows QQQ offering lower volatility through diversification, while QQQA introduces higher sensitivity to trend persistence and sector rotation within the same underlying universe. Both benefit from technology sector momentum but differ in how they capture earnings and capital-flow dynamics across market cycles.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF and equity research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor QQQ for most investors due to its structural efficiency, lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the Nasdaq-100, and consistent trend alignment with large-cap technology leadership. QQQA offers compelling tactical exposure for those prioritizing momentum signals but carries higher costs and concentration risk. The probabilistic assessment points to QQQ as the more durable core holding in prevailing market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QQQ vs. QQQA commentary
Sep 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QQQ is a Buy and QQQA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QQQ has more net assets: 490B vs. QQQA (51.1M). QQQA has a higher annual dividend yield than QQQ: QQQA (35.174) vs QQQ (17.101). QQQ was incepted earlier than QQQA: QQQ (28 years) vs QQQA (5 years). QQQ (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than QQQA (0.58). QQQA has a higher turnover QQQ (7.98) vs QQQ (7.98).
QQQQQQAQQQ / QQQA
Gain YTD17.10135.17449%
Net Assets490B51.1M958,904%
Total Expense Ratio0.180.5831%
Turnover7.98124.006%
Yield0.420.031,621%
Fund Existence28 years5 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QQQQQQA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QQQA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEF45.781.19
+2.67%
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust
POWA90.710.47
+0.52%
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
PMAU26.91N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August
EMD10.45-0.04
-0.38%
Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund
AVGG23.06-1.44
-5.88%
Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF