QQQ
Price
$611.07
Change
+$0.88 (+0.14%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Net Assets
394.93B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SCHG
Price
$30.51
Change
+$0.06 (+0.20%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Net Assets
50.78B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QQQ vs SCHG

Header iconQQQ vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts QQQ vs SCHGBanner chart's image
QQQ vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) vs. Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG)

Key Takeaways

  • QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index with 102 holdings, heavily tilted toward technology at nearly 60%, while SCHG follows the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index with about 200 holdings for broader diversification.
  • SCHG offers a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.04% compared to QQQ's 0.18%, enhancing long-term cost efficiency.
  • Both ETFs exhibit high concentration in top holdings, with QQQ's top 10 at 47% and SCHG's exceeding 57%, dominated by leaders like NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.
  • QQQ provides Nasdaq-listed innovation exposure, ideal for tech enthusiasts, whereas SCHG captures wider U.S. large-cap growth across exchanges, balancing sector risks.
  • In recent market cycles, QQQ has shown higher volatility due to its tech focus but stronger long-term returns driven by sector momentum.
  • Liquidity is robust for both, with QQQ boasting higher daily volumes, suiting active traders, while SCHG appeals to cost-conscious buy-and-hold investors.

Introduction

In the competitive landscape of growth-oriented ETFs, Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) stand out as popular choices for investors seeking exposure to high-potential U.S. equities. QQQ delivers concentrated access to Nasdaq's innovation leaders, while SCHG provides broader large-cap growth coverage at minimal cost. These funds compete indirectly, offering alternative strategies within the large-cap growth category amid surging interest in technology and AI-driven themes. This ETF comparison highlights their structural differences, sector exposures, and relative positioning to aid informed allocation decisions in today's dynamic market.

Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) Overview

The Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) is a passively managed ETF tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, comprising the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq. It holds 102 stocks, with top holdings including NVDA (8.66%), AAPL (7.48%), MSFT (5.95%), AMZN (4.55%), and TSLA (3.94%), accounting for 47.2% of assets. Sector allocations emphasize technology (59.77%), consumer discretionary (20.75%), and health care (5.25%). The expense ratio is 0.18%, and the fund rebalances quarterly while reconstituting annually. As a unit investment trust converted to ETF structure, QQQ offers high liquidity with average daily volumes exceeding 70 million shares, distinguishing it through pure exposure to innovative Nasdaq names.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) Overview

The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) passively replicates the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, targeting growth stocks among the top 750 U.S. companies by market cap. It features approximately 198 holdings, with top positions led by NVDA (11.12%), AAPL (9.60%), MSFT (7.62%), AMZN (5.31%), and META (4.64%), comprising over 57% of the portfolio. Key sectors include technology (around 43-45%), communication services (16%), and consumer cyclical (13%). With an ultra-low expense ratio of 0.04% and low portfolio turnover (15%), SCHG emphasizes cost efficiency and tax effectiveness. Its broad index methodology and NYSE Arca listing provide diversified growth exposure beyond Nasdaq confines.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The large-cap growth sector, powering both QQQ and SCHG, thrives amid AI proliferation, cloud computing expansion, and digital transformation. Technology remains the dominant force, with relentless capital spending on AI infrastructure—projected to exceed $300 billion in 2026—fueling hyperscaler investments and semiconductor demand. Macro drivers like resilient U.S. economic growth and interest rate stabilization support earnings cycles for mega-cap leaders. Capital flows heavily favor growth ETFs, reflecting optimism in innovation themes, though regulatory scrutiny on AI ethics and antitrust pressures pose risks. Sector rotation toward defensives during volatility underscores the need for diversified exposure within growth mandates.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, QQQ has generally outperformed SCHG, delivering annualized returns around 20% over the past decade versus SCHG's 18%, attributed to its heavier technology weighting and Nasdaq concentration. In recent months, both faced headwinds from tech pullbacks, with YTD declines near -2% for QQQ and -6% for SCHG, but QQQ's relative strength stems from top holdings' earnings resilience amid AI momentum. SCHG exhibits slightly lower volatility due to broader diversification, buffering sector-specific swings. Positioning-wise, QQQ amplifies upside in tech rallies tied to AI catalysts, while SCHG's inclusive approach aids stability during rotations, with cost savings compounding over time.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like momentum, mean reversion, and pattern recognition, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, adaptive performers rise to this curated section, helping traders identify signals for stocks, ETFs, and more. Explore these bots to enhance your strategy with data-driven insights—visit today to see real-time leaders.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SCHG for its superior cost efficiency (0.04% expense ratio), broader diversification across 200 holdings, and balanced growth exposure, reducing concentration risks while capturing sector momentum. QQQ's Nasdaq focus excels in tech uptrends, but SCHG's structural advantages position it probabilistically stronger for sustained outperformance in varied cycles, barring extreme AI hype.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QQQ vs. SCHG commentary
Apr 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QQQ is a Buy and SCHG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QQQ has more net assets: 395B vs. SCHG (50.8B). QQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: QQQ (-0.402) vs SCHG (-6.353). QQQ was incepted earlier than SCHG: QQQ (27 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than QQQ (0.18). SCHG has a higher turnover QQQ (7.98) vs QQQ (7.98).
QQQSCHGQQQ / SCHG
Gain YTD-0.402-6.3536%
Net Assets395B50.8B778%
Total Expense Ratio0.180.04450%
Turnover7.9827.0030%
Yield0.490.43113%
Fund Existence27 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QQQSCHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIEQ45.140.03
+0.07%
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF
MYD10.77N/A
N/A
Blackrock Muniyield Fund
BNDD98.58N/A
N/A
Quadratic Deflation ETF
FPE18.03-0.01
-0.06%
First Trust Preferred Sec & Inc ETF
RIFR28.92-0.13
-0.45%
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure ETF