QSR
Price
$64.86
Change
-$0.65 (-0.99%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
21.26B
42 days until earnings call
YUM
Price
$147.17
Change
+$4.47 (+3.13%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
40.91B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

QSR vs YUM

Header iconQSR vs YUM Comparison
Open Charts QSR vs YUMBanner chart's image
Restaurant Brands International
Price$64.86
Change-$0.65 (-0.99%)
Volume$3.41M
Capitalization21.26B
Yum! Brands
Price$147.17
Change+$4.47 (+3.13%)
Volume$35.54K
Capitalization40.91B
QSR vs YUM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QSR vs. YUM commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QSR is a StrongBuy and YUM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (QSR: $64.86 vs. YUM: $147.18)
Brand notoriety: QSR: Not notable vs. YUM: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QSR: 110% vs. YUM: 189%
Market capitalization -- QSR: $21.26B vs. YUM: $40.91B
QSR [@Restaurants] is valued at $21.26B. YUM’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $40.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $204.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QSR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileYUM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • QSR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • YUM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, QSR is a better buy in the long-term than YUM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QSR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QSR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • YUM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YUM is a better buy in the short-term than QSR.

Price Growth

QSR (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.93% price change this week, while YUM (@Restaurants) price change was +6.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

QSR is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

YUM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.60% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUM($40.9B) has a higher market cap than QSR($21.3B). YUM has higher P/E ratio than QSR: YUM (29.32) vs QSR (21.99). YUM YTD gains are higher at: 10.764 vs. QSR (1.378). YUM (2.62B) and QSR (2.57B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . YUM has less debt than QSR: YUM (11.4B) vs QSR (15.9B). QSR has higher revenues than YUM: QSR (8.78B) vs YUM (7.74B).
QSRYUMQSR / YUM
Capitalization21.3B40.9B52%
EBITDA2.57B2.62B98%
Gain YTD1.37810.76413%
P/E Ratio21.9929.3275%
Revenue8.78B7.74B113%
Total CashN/A607M-
Total Debt15.9B11.4B139%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QSR vs YUM: Fundamental Ratings
QSR
YUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
544
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4018
SMR RATING
1..100
31100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2628
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QSR's Valuation (19) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (50). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (40). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's SMR Rating (31) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for YUM (100). This means that QSR’s stock grew significantly faster than YUM’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (60). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (28). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSRYUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CC11.400.25
+2.24%
Chemours Company (The)
MFIC12.350.09
+0.73%
MidCap Financial Investment Corp
WST221.02-1.66
-0.75%
West Pharmaceutical Services
CRIS2.17-0.02
-0.91%
Curis
NC40.73-0.60
-1.45%
NACCO Industries

YUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUM has been loosely correlated with MCD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUM jumps, then MCD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUM
1D Price
Change %
YUM100%
+3.14%
MCD - YUM
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
QSR - YUM
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
YUMC - YUM
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
FRSH - YUM
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
DPZ - YUM
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
More