RGLD
Price
$176.97
Change
-$0.92 (-0.52%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
11.65B
62 days until earnings call
SNWGF
Price
$6.85
Change
+$0.16 (+2.39%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RGLD vs SNWGF

Header iconRGLD vs SNWGF Comparison
Open Charts RGLD vs SNWGFBanner chart's image
Royal Gold
Price$176.97
Change-$0.92 (-0.52%)
Volume$597.12K
Capitalization11.65B
SNOWLINE GOLD
Price$6.85
Change+$0.16 (+2.39%)
Volume$45.7K
Capitalization1.09B
RGLD vs SNWGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNWGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGLD vs. SNWGF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLD is a Buy and SNWGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (RGLD: $176.97 vs. SNWGF: $6.85)
Brand notoriety: RGLD and SNWGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGLD: 71% vs. SNWGF: 32%
Market capitalization -- RGLD: $11.65B vs. SNWGF: $1.09B
RGLD [@Precious Metals] is valued at $11.65B. SNWGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNWGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RGLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SNWGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGLD is a better buy in the long-term than SNWGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGLD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNWGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RGLD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SNWGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGLD is a better buy in the short-term than SNWGF.

Price Growth

RGLD (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.28% price change this week, while SNWGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4166.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

RGLD is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLD($11.7B) has a higher market cap than SNWGF($1.09B). SNWGF YTD gains are higher at: 91.287 vs. RGLD (35.374). RGLD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 658M vs. SNWGF (-31.39M). RGLD has more cash in the bank: 248M vs. SNWGF (52M). SNWGF has less debt than RGLD: SNWGF (256K) vs RGLD (50M). RGLD has higher revenues than SNWGF: RGLD (799M) vs SNWGF (0).
RGLDSNWGFRGLD / SNWGF
Capitalization11.7B1.09B1,070%
EBITDA658M-31.39M-2,096%
Gain YTD35.37491.28739%
P/E Ratio25.95N/A-
Revenue799M0-
Total Cash248M52M477%
Total Debt50M256K19,531%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGLD: Fundamental Ratings
RGLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGLDSNWGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNWGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMFAX92.66N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Materials A
PLCGX18.16N/A
N/A
Principal LargeCap Growth I R6
GQHPX13.36N/A
N/A
GQG Partners US Quality Value Fund Inv
USLYX70.74N/A
N/A
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth R2
FCLZX13.42N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Climate Action Z

RGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGLD has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGLD jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLD
1D Price
Change %
RGLD100%
-0.52%
WPM - RGLD
81%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
AEM - RGLD
80%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
AGI - RGLD
77%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
FNV - RGLD
76%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
EGO - RGLD
73%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
More

SNWGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNWGF has been loosely correlated with NFGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNWGF jumps, then NFGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNWGF
1D Price
Change %
SNWGF100%
+2.39%
NFGC - SNWGF
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
RGLD - SNWGF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
KGC - SNWGF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
AEM - SNWGF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
IAUX - SNWGF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
More