RJF
Price
$162.66
Change
+$4.47 (+2.83%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
31.7B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPMA
Price
$25.07
Change
+$0.10 (+0.40%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RJF vs SPMA

RJF vs SPMA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RJF vs. SPMA commentary
Jul 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RJF is a StrongBuy and SPMA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2026
Stock price -- (RJF: $162.66 vs. SPMA: $25.07)
Brand notoriety: RJF and SPMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RJF: 108% vs. SPMA: 39%
Market capitalization -- RJF: $31.7B vs. SPMA: $0
RJF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $31.7B. SPMA’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $154.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RJF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSPMA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RJF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SPMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the long-term than SPMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RJF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPMA’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RJF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SPMA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the short-term than SPMA.

Price Growth

RJF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +8.45% price change this week, while SPMA (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

RJF is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.56% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPMA YTD gains are higher at: 3.474 vs. RJF (2.375). RJF has more cash in the bank: 2.61B vs. SPMA (5.81M). SPMA has less debt than RJF: SPMA (60M) vs RJF (4.22B). RJF has higher revenues than SPMA: RJF (14.5B) vs SPMA (-121.96M).
RJFSPMARJF / SPMA
Capitalization31.7BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.3753.47468%
P/E Ratio14.36N/A-
Revenue14.5B-121.96M-11,889%
Total Cash2.61B5.81M45,022%
Total Debt4.22B60M7,035%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RJF: Fundamental Ratings
RJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RJFSPMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
5%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
1%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
2%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PJT162.997.07
+4.53%
PJT Partners
MLM599.4220.18
+3.48%
Martin Marietta Materials
SUPV9.550.30
+3.24%
Grupo Supervielle SA
CHEC10.16N/A
N/A
Chenghe Acquisition III Co
UUU3.87-0.32
-7.64%
Universal Safety Products Inc

RJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RJF
1D Price
Change %
RJF100%
+2.83%
SF - RJF
87%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
MS - RJF
82%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
EVR - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
GS - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
PIPR - RJF
78%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
More

SPMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPMA has been loosely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPMA jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPMA
1D Price
Change %
SPMA100%
+0.40%
ARCC - SPMA
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NTRS - SPMA
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BN - SPMA
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
JHG - SPMA
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RJF - SPMA
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.83%
More