Advertisement
RUN vs ZSC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUN is a Hold and ZSC is a Hold.
RUN's Stochastic Oscillator is staying in overbought zone for 1 day
Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where RUN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
The Aroon Indicator for RUN entered a downward trend on October 29, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 30, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on RUN as a result. In 77 of 95 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for RUN just turned positive on October 20, 2026. Looking at past instances where RUN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 40 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.
Following a +1.72% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where RUN advanced for three days, in 214 of 257 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
RUN may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 41 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 73 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.516) is normal, around the industry mean (2.526). P/E Ratio (4.400) is within average values for comparable stocks, (4.787). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (3.071) is also within normal values, averaging (1.699). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.054) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.646) is also within normal values, averaging (5.133).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 79 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. RUN’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 83 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. RUN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 99, placing this stock worse than average.
ZSC's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ZSC turned positive on October 22, 2026. Looking at past instances where ZSC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 19 of 24 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 21 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 16, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on ZSC as a result. In 25 of 37 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
ZSC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 11 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
ZSC moved below its 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for ZSC crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 05, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 3 of 8 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 38%.
The Aroon Indicator for ZSC entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
RUN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 41 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RUN | ZSC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 87% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 67% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RUN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while .
- RUN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RUN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- RUN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
RUN (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а -1.32% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was +3.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -44.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
RUN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Alternative Power Generation (+3.71% weekly)The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
Advertisement
RUN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUN has been closely correlated with FCEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUN jumps, then FCEL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUN | 100% | -1.45% | ||
| FCEL - RUN | 67% Closely correlated | -7.88% | ||
| BE - RUN | 61% Loosely correlated | -8.61% | ||
| PLUG - RUN | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| ENVX - RUN | 55% Loosely correlated | -10.26% | ||
| ENPH - RUN | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||
ZSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ZSC and NEE have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZSC and NEE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZSC | 100% | N/A | ||
| NEE - ZSC | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.91% | ||
| ENPH - ZSC | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.81% | ||
| RUN - ZSC | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
| JKS - ZSC | 2% Poorly correlated | +4.86% | ||
| CSIQ - ZSC | -0% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
More | ||||