RUSHA saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on September 29, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 54 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 35 of the 54 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 65%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 18, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on RUSHA as a result. In 44 of 77 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 57%.
RUSHA moved below its 50-day moving average on September 18, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for RUSHA crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 21, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where RUSHA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
The Aroon Indicator for RUSHA entered a downward trend on October 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 3 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +2.99% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where RUSHA advanced for three days, in 237 of 328 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
RUSHA may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 14 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 17 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.380) is normal, around the industry mean (2.313). P/E Ratio (21.488) is within average values for comparable stocks, (44.786). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.200) is also within normal values, averaging (0.695). Dividend Yield (0.011) settles around the average of (0.007) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.813) is also within normal values, averaging (0.919).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 29 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 85, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. RUSHA’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 65 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
VVV saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on September 29, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 81 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 55 of the 81 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 68%.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where VVV's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 21 of 38 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 55%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for VVV just turned positive on September 24, 2026. Looking at past instances where VVV's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 30 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
Following a +3.81% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where VVV advanced for three days, in 179 of 295 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
VVV may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 45 of 57 cases where VVV's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
The 50-day moving average for VVV moved below the 200-day moving average on September 22, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where VVV declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.
The Aroon Indicator for VVV entered a downward trend on September 30, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 6 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 71 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. VVV’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 83 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: VVV's P/B Ratio (8.718) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (2.313). P/E Ratio (35.160) is within average values for comparable stocks, (44.786). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.104) is also within normal values, averaging (0.695). Dividend Yield (0.004) settles around the average of (0.007) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.772) is also within normal values, averaging (0.919).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. VVV’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 85, placing this stock worse than average.
RUSHA | VVV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 71 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 29 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSHA's Valuation (17) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for VVV (83) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew significantly faster than VVV’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VVV (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than VVV’s over the last 12 months.
VVV's SMR Rating (35) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as RUSHA (65) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that VVV’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as VVV (71) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to VVV’s over the last 12 months.
VVV's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as RUSHA (14) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that VVV’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
| RUSHA | VVV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 72% | 14 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 67% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RUSHA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while VVV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RUSHA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VVV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -2.99% price change this week, while VVV (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -1.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.30%.
RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
VVV is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DIHP | 33.76 | -0.16 | -0.47% |
| Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) | |||
| OSCV | 39.64 | -0.30 | -0.75% |
| Opus Small Cap Value ETF (OSCV) | |||
| PEX | 21.96 | -0.24 | -1.08% |
| ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) | |||
| GQQQ | 35.89 | -0.59 | -1.63% |
| Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) | |||
| FCTR | 35.47 | -1.36 | -3.69% |
| First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VVV has been loosely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VVV jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VVV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VVV | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| RUSHA - VVV | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| CWH - VVV | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| ABG - VVV | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| RUSHB - VVV | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| AN - VVV | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||