Advertisement
RUSHA vs VVV
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Rush Enterprises (RUSHA) vs. Valvoline (VVV) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- RUSHA is a cyclical commercial-vehicle dealer network, while VVV is a pure-play preventive automotive-maintenance business with more stable, non-discretionary demand.
- Valvoline delivered roughly 25% revenue growth and 8.2% system-wide same-store sales growth in its latest quarter, whereas Rush Enterprises is working through a soft medium-duty and freight cycle.
- Both stocks carry "Buy"-leaning analyst consensus, but their risk profiles differ sharply: RUSHA is tied to the trucking cycle, while VVV is tied to consumer car maintenance.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: Based on trend consistency, stability, and catalyst quality, the AI currently leans toward VVV over RUSHA.
- Get more detail on each name by visiting RUSHA Major News, RUSHA Today's Price Move, VVV Major News, and VVV Today's Price Move.
- Explore Trending AI Robots to see the AI trading bots currently best suited to today's market conditions.
Introduction
Investors weighing a cyclical industrial play against a steadier consumer-services franchise will find the comparison between RUSHA and VVV instructive. Rush Enterprises is the largest network of commercial-vehicle dealerships in North America, while Valvoline is a leading operator of quick, preventive automotive-maintenance centers. The two companies sit in different parts of the economy — one tied to freight and trucking demand, the other to routine car care. This stock comparison examines their business models, recent performance, and relative market positioning, and is most relevant for traders and investors deciding where momentum, stability, and catalysts are currently strongest.
RUSHA Overview and Recent Performance
Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA), headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas, operates the largest network of commercial-vehicle dealerships in North America, selling new and used trucks and providing parts, service, leasing, and rental through its Rush Truck Centers. The business is inherently cyclical, moving with freight demand and commercial-vehicle replacement cycles.
Recent quarters have reflected a mixed backdrop. In its latest reported quarter, revenue rose to roughly $2.1 billion with net income of about $78 million, helped by strong Class 8 (heavy-duty) truck deliveries, while medium-duty sales remained soft as large fleet customers delayed orders. Aftermarket parts and service — a steadier, higher-margin segment that contributes a majority of gross profit — has continued to provide support. The company also completed a three-for-two stock split in recent months and maintained a modest dividend. Sentiment has been influenced by a recovering used-truck market, gradual order intake, and management's outlook for a stronger second half, balanced against lingering industry-wide regulatory and tariff uncertainty.
VVV Overview and Recent Performance
Valvoline Inc. (VVV), based in Lexington, Kentucky, provides quick, preventive automotive maintenance — including oil changes and related services — through more than 2,400 franchised and company-operated centers across the United States and Canada. Its core demand is largely non-discretionary, which lends the business relative stability compared with cyclical industrials.
Recent performance has been strong. In its most recently reported quarter, net revenue grew about 25% year over year to roughly $504 million, supported by system-wide same-store sales growth of 8.2% and the integration of the acquired Breeze Auto Care network. Management raised full-year guidance for same-store sales, adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), and adjusted EPS (earnings per share). The company has also been working through a refranchising transition and elevated technology-related spending, and it paused buybacks while reducing leverage. These factors, along with periodic lubricant-cost pressures, have tempered near-term sentiment even as the underlying operating momentum has stayed positive.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the strongest and most relevant strategies earn a place in its curated Trending AI Robots section. Each bot differs in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance history, and the specific set of tickers it follows, so the page highlights the bots best aligned with current market conditions rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. Investors can browse bots spanning day-trading, swing-trading, and longer-horizon styles, each with its own track record and statistics. For those comparing names like RUSHA and VVV, this is a practical way to see how automated, data-driven strategies are positioning across the market today. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify the bots currently matching your timeframe and risk preferences.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The two companies differ most in their exposure to economic cycles. RUSHA rides the commercial-vehicle and freight cycle: it benefits when fleets replace aging trucks and order activity recovers, but it also absorbs downturns in medium-duty sales and regulatory-related uncertainty. VVV, by contrast, serves routine car maintenance, a habitual purchase that has shown resilience even during past economic stress, giving it a more defensive growth profile.
On growth, Valvoline is expanding revenue at a double-digit pace through same-store gains, new-store openings, and its Breeze Auto Care acquisition, while Rush Enterprises is managing a recent pattern of flat-to-declining vehicle revenue offset by stable aftermarket contribution. On valuation and balance sheet, RUSHA trades at a modest multiple with low leverage and a dividend, while VVV carries a higher trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio and elevated leverage following its acquisition, though its forward multiple is lower as earnings are projected to grow. In terms of sentiment, both hold "Buy"-leaning analyst consensus, but recent price-target activity has been mixed for VVV, whereas RUSHA's outlook hinges on a cyclical recovery in trucking.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Weighing trend consistency, stability, and near-term catalysts, Tickeron's AI would currently lean toward VVV over RUSHA. Valvoline's combination of double-digit revenue growth, positive same-store sales momentum, a raised guidance outlook, and comparatively non-cyclical demand gives it a steadier, more consistent trend profile. Rush Enterprises offers value and cyclical upside, but its performance remains more dependent on a freight and trucking recovery that is still unfolding. This assessment reflects observable factors — consistency of momentum, stability of demand, and the quality of near-term catalysts — rather than any guarantee of future returns.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUSHA is a Buy and VVV is a Hold.
RUSHA's RSI Indicator recovers from oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for RUSHA moved out of oversold territory on October 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 22 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 18 of the 22 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 82%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
Following a +1.18% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where RUSHA advanced for three days, in 229 of 325 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
RUSHA may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 43 of 69 cases where RUSHA's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 28, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on RUSHA as a result. In 49 of 78 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for RUSHA turned negative on October 28, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 54 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 34 of the 54 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 63%.
The 50-day moving average for RUSHA moved below the 200-day moving average on October 23, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where RUSHA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
The Aroon Indicator for RUSHA entered a downward trend on November 03, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 14 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 83, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 53 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.217) is normal, around the industry mean (1.513). P/E Ratio (19.417) is within average values for comparable stocks, (12.280). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.200) is also within normal values, averaging (0.695). Dividend Yield (0.013) settles around the average of (0.010) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.813) is also within normal values, averaging (0.919).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. RUSHA’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 65 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
VVV in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026
VVV moved above its 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 26 of 38 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on September 29, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on VVV as a result. In 52 of 79 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
The 10-day moving average for VVV crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 13 of 19 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
Following a +4.74% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where VVV advanced for three days, in 177 of 292 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 82 of 192 cases where VVV Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 43%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for VVV moved out of overbought territory on November 03, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 37 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 24 of the 37 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 65%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 8 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where VVV declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.
VVV broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 4 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 49 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. VVV’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 87 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: VVV's P/B Ratio (10.332) is slightly higher than the industry average of (1.513). P/E Ratio (42.175) is within average values for comparable stocks, (12.280). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.104) is also within normal values, averaging (0.695). Dividend Yield (0.015) settles around the average of (0.010) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.772) is also within normal values, averaging (0.919).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. VVV’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 83, placing this stock worse than average.
RUSHA | VVV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 89 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSHA's Valuation (53) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VVV (87) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than VVV’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VVV (89) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than VVV’s over the last 12 months.
VVV's SMR Rating (35) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as RUSHA (65) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that VVV’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
VVV's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as RUSHA (58) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that VVV’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
VVV's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as RUSHA (14) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that VVV’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
| RUSHA | VVV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 7 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 70% | 21 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 61% | 8 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 43% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RUSHA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while VVV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- RUSHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- VVV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RUSHA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VVV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RUSHA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- VVV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -2.66% price change this week, while VVV (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +5.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +3.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2027.
VVV is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Automotive Aftermarket (+3.46% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
Advertisement
RUSHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| RUSHB - RUSHA | 83% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| ONEW - RUSHA | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| HVT - RUSHA | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| HZO - RUSHA | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| WSM - RUSHA | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.22% | ||
More | ||||
VVV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VVV has been loosely correlated with CWH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VVV jumps, then CWH could also see price increases.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TSMU | 59.72 | 1.78 | +3.08% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) | |||
| RJDI | 29.54 | 0.08 | +0.26% |
| RJ Eagle GCM Dividend Select Income ETF (RJDI) | |||
| SHYD | 22.56 | 0.01 | +0.07% |
| VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF (SHYD) | |||
| USAX | 2.38 | -0.06 | -2.46% |
| Tradr 2X Long USAR Daily ETF (USAX) | |||
| TSLL | 11.07 | -0.32 | -2.81% |
| Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) | |||