ZWS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SCOW | ZWS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 59% | 8 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 62% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HYSA | 14.60 | -0.09 | -0.61% |
| BondBloxx High Yield Income ETF (HYSA) | |||
| SPIP | 24.57 | -0.18 | -0.73% |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) | |||
| MUNX | 23.75 | -0.20 | -0.85% |
| AMG GW&K Muni Income ETF (MUNX) | |||
| SCHF | 27.74 | -0.51 | -1.81% |
| Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) | |||
| FDM | 88.60 | -1.67 | -1.84% |
| First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCOW has been loosely correlated with ZWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCOW jumps, then ZWS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCOW | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZWS - SCOW | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| MTCH - SCOW | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| SHOO - SCOW | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| ETSY - SCOW | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.92% | ||
| CSW - SCOW | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZWS has been closely correlated with XYL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZWS jumps, then XYL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZWS | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| XYL - ZWS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| LECO - ZWS | 70% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| HLIO - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| HLMN - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| PNR - ZWS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||