This stock comparison examines SFBS and TRMK, two regional bank holding companies operating in the southeastern U.S. Both firms focus on commercial and real estate lending, making them relevant for investors tracking financial sector performance amid interest rate dynamics and economic shifts. Traders seeking relative value in regional banks, or those evaluating dividend payers with growth potential, will find insights into their business models, recent momentum, and market positioning. This analysis draws on verifiable data to highlight contrasts in scale, profitability, and stability.
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS) serves as the holding company for ServisFirst Bank, offering deposit products like checking and savings accounts alongside loans for commercial real estate, construction, and businesses. Headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama, it emphasizes relationship banking in the Southeast.
In recent market activity, SFBS stock has hovered around $78, up from mid-$70s in late March, reflecting resilience post its Q1 2026 earnings release. The company reported EPS of approximately $1.18 (beating estimates) and revenue growth of 20.6% year-over-year to $159 million, though it fell short of revenue forecasts. Strong net income of $83 million underscored profitability, with an efficiency ratio below 30%. Sentiment has been supported by dividend hikes and analyst upgrades, amid broader regional bank recovery, despite deposit competition pressures.
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) operates Trustmark National Bank, delivering banking, wealth management, and trust services through General Banking and Wealth Management segments. Based in Jackson, Mississippi, it provides commercial real estate loans, mortgages, and treasury management across the South.
TRMK shares have traded near $45 in recent weeks, maintaining stability after climbing from lower levels earlier in the year. Year-to-date gains outpace peers at 16.7%, driven by consistent execution in lending and deposit gathering. Key metrics include solid TTM revenue of $787 million and net income of $224 million. Market sentiment reflects confidence in its lower-risk profile, with no major disruptions in recent quarters, though broader sector headwinds like net interest margin (NII, income from loans minus deposit costs) pressures have influenced performance.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots employ varied approaches like swing trading dips, high-win-rate semiconductor plays, or multi-agent systems for industrials and energy, with timeframes from 5 minutes to several days. Currently featuring 25 trending bots, standout performers boast annualized returns of 50-100%, win rates of 55-88%, profit factors up to 6.94, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 8. For instance, semiconductor-focused bots like those on SOXL or LRCX/TER show 96-97% annualized returns with 65-68% win rates. This section highlights bots best suited to prevailing market conditions, offering transparency on stats like max drawdown and average trade duration. Explore Trending AI Robots to evaluate options aligning with your trading style.
Both SFBS and TRMK operate similar business models as regional banks, emphasizing commercial real estate and business loans, with exposure to Southeastern markets vulnerable to real estate cycles. SFBS differentiates through higher profitability (EPS $5.06 vs. $3.70) and scale, fueling growth via loan originations, while TRMK leverages wealth management for diversified revenue.
Recent momentum favors TRMK's stronger YTD return, but SFBS shows upward trajectory post-earnings. Risk profiles contrast with TRMK's lower beta indicating less market sensitivity, versus SFBS's growth-oriented volatility. Valuation trade-offs include TRMK's cheaper P/E (12.22 vs. 15.44) and higher yield, positioning it for value plays, while SFBS offers superior ROTCE (return on tangible common equity, a profitability gauge). Sector sentiment remains cautious on NII compression, but both benefit from stabilizing deposits.
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward SFBS due to its trend consistency in recent weeks, robust earnings catalysts from Q1 results, and relative positioning via higher EPS and revenue growth. While TRMK provides stability and value, SFBS exhibits stronger profitability momentum, suggesting higher probability of outperformance in the near term absent major shifts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SFBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRMK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SFBS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRMK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
SFBS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.56% price change this week, while TRMK (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.60%.
SFBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 20, 2026.
TRMK is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| SFBS | TRMK | SFBS / TRMK | |
| Capitalization | 4.53B | 2.68B | 169% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.320 | 17.029 | 90% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.84 | 11.96 | 116% |
| Revenue | 583M | 693M | 84% |
| Total Cash | 95.1M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 34.8M | 563M | 6% |
SFBS | TRMK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 31 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TRMK's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBS (85). This means that TRMK’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.
TRMK's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (75). This means that TRMK’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.
SFBS's SMR Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TRMK (34). This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to TRMK’s over the last 12 months.
TRMK's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (48). This means that TRMK’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.
SFBS's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TRMK (97). This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to TRMK’s over the last 12 months.
| SFBS | TRMK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 59% | 27 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 49% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MFMO | 25.27 | 0.33 | +1.31% |
| Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | |||
| BTOP | 28.72 | N/A | N/A |
| Bitwise Bitcoin and Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF | |||
| IQHI | 25.96 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| NYLI MacKay High Income ETF | |||
| SPTL | 26.12 | -0.18 | -0.68% |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio L/T Trs ETF | |||
| RPAR | 22.67 | -0.17 | -0.72% |
| RPAR Risk Parity ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with SFNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then SFNC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFBS | 100% | +1.81% | ||
| SFNC - SFBS | 83% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| UBSI - SFBS | 82% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| TRMK - SFBS | 81% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| UCB - SFBS | 80% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| CATY - SFBS | 80% Closely correlated | +1.42% | ||
More | ||||