Advertisement
SNAP vs ZM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNAP is a Hold and ZM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SNAP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SNAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SNAP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SNAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- ZM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
SNAP (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -2.55% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was +6.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.87%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
SNAP is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
ZM is expected to report earnings on Aug 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (-1.88% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
@Packaged Software (+2.30% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| SNAP | ZM | SNAP / ZM | |
| Capitalization | 9.55B | 32.8B | 29% |
| EBITDA | -99.77M | 1.26B | -8% |
| Gain YTD | -28.996 | 23.050 | -126% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 15.64 | - |
| Revenue | 6.1B | 4.87B | 125% |
| Total Cash | 2.82B | 7.82B | 36% |
| Total Debt | 4.2B | 58.5M | 7,183% |
SNAP | ZM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZM's Valuation (83) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SNAP (99) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to SNAP’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SNAP (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to SNAP’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's SMR Rating (46) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNAP (96) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNAP’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SNAP (62) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to SNAP’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SNAP (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to SNAP’s over the last 12 months.
| SNAP | ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 9 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 68% |
Advertisement
SNAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNAP has been loosely correlated with IAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNAP jumps, then IAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNAP | 100% | -0.52% | ||
| IAC - SNAP | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| RUM - SNAP | 38% Loosely correlated | -6.97% | ||
| PINS - SNAP | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| CARG - SNAP | 36% Loosely correlated | -4.80% | ||
| ZIP - SNAP | 34% Loosely correlated | -14.79% | ||
More | ||||
ZM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.