Advertisement
ADP vs EPAM
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADP is a Hold and EPAM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileEPAM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ADP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- EPAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPAM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ADP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- EPAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ADP (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.66% price change this week, while EPAM (@Information Technology Services) price change was -3.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
ADP is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
EPAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Information Technology Services (+0.66% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
| ADP | EPAM | ADP / EPAM | |
| Capitalization | 120B | 9.44B | 1,271% |
| EBITDA | 6.35B | 688M | 923% |
| Gain YTD | 2.153 | -27.525 | -8% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.66 | 24.17 | 123% |
| Revenue | 20.6B | 5.07B | 406% |
| Total Cash | 7.85B | 1.04B | 754% |
| Total Debt | 9.07B | 163M | 5,561% |
ADP | EPAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ADP's Valuation (13) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAM (66) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ADP’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
ADP's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for EPAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ADP’s stock grew significantly faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
ADP's SMR Rating (15) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAM (66) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ADP’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
ADP's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as EPAM (59) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ADP’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
ADP's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as EPAM (73) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ADP’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
| ADP | EPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 57% | 9 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BALCX | 37.64 | 0.20 | +0.53% |
| American Funds American Balanced C | |||
| KLCIX | 20.81 | N/A | N/A |
| Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap IS | |||
| BGLYX | 14.30 | N/A | N/A |
| Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureI | |||
| GLEIX | 13.89 | N/A | N/A |
| GS Energy Infrastructure Fd Inv Shares | |||
| CRQSX | 14.10 | N/A | N/A |
| Catholic Rspnsbl Invst Equity Idx Ins | |||
ADP and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADP has been closely correlated with PAYX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADP jumps, then PAYX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADP | 100% | -1.73% | ||
| PAYX - ADP | 83% Closely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| ROP - ADP | 67% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| SSNC - ADP | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| PCTY - ADP | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| PAYC - ADP | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||
EPAM and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAM has been closely correlated with CTSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPAM jumps, then CTSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAM | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| CTSH - EPAM | 67% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| KD - EPAM | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.12% | ||
| ACN - EPAM | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| DXC - EPAM | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| GDYN - EPAM | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||