Advertisement
APH or CLS or TEL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Amphenol Corporation (APH) vs. Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs. TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Amphenol Corporation (APH), Celestica Inc. (CLS), and TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) operate in the interconnected electronics and connectivity sector, with exposure to AI infrastructure, data communications, automotive, and industrial markets.
- Recent market activity shows varied performance influenced by AI-driven demand, with CLS highlighting strong revenue growth in electronics manufacturing services while APH and TEL demonstrate steady demand for connectors and sensors.
- All three companies benefit from broader technology spending trends, though differences in business models—component manufacturing for APH and TEL versus contract manufacturing for CLS—create distinct risk and growth profiles.
- Valuation sensitivity remains a key factor, as these stocks often react to macroeconomic signals, supply chain developments, and earnings guidance updates in recent weeks.
- Market sentiment has been supported by ongoing digital transformation initiatives, positioning the trio as relevant benchmarks for investors tracking hardware enablers of AI and connectivity.
- Relative positioning depends on factors such as end-market diversification, margin stability, and exposure to high-growth areas like data centers and electric vehicles.
Introduction
Amphenol Corporation (APH), Celestica Inc. (CLS), and TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) represent established players in the electronics components and connectivity space. These stocks attract attention from institutional investors, growth-oriented traders, and sector specialists seeking exposure to technology infrastructure trends. The comparison highlights differences in business models, end-market exposure, and recent performance dynamics amid evolving demand for AI-related hardware, automotive electronics, and industrial solutions. Market participants evaluating relative value, momentum, and risk characteristics in the broader technology hardware group may find this analysis useful for portfolio construction or tactical allocation decisions.
Amphenol Corporation (APH) Overview and Recent Performance
Amphenol Corporation (APH) designs and manufactures electrical, electronic, and fiber optic connectors used across automotive, broadband communications, commercial aerospace, industrial, information technology, and mobile networks markets. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected steady demand for interconnect solutions supporting data center expansion and automotive electrification. Broader market activity has been shaped by consistent order flow in high-speed connectors and sensors, with sentiment supported by the company's diversified geographic and end-market footprint. Performance has aligned with sector peers amid ongoing technology spending, though macroeconomic uncertainties have contributed to periodic volatility in trading patterns.
Celestica Inc. (CLS) Overview and Recent Performance
Celestica Inc. (CLS) provides electronics manufacturing services, hardware platforms, and supply chain solutions primarily for communications, enterprise, and industrial customers. Recent market activity has featured notable revenue expansion tied to AI infrastructure deployments, with the company reporting significant year-over-year growth and raising its full-year outlook. Sentiment has been influenced by strong positioning in high-volume production of servers and networking equipment, though share price movements have also responded to broader market rotations and earnings expectations. The stock's trajectory in recent weeks underscores its role as a contract manufacturer benefiting from hyperscale technology investments.
TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) Overview and Recent Performance
TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) develops connectivity and sensor solutions for automotive, industrial, aerospace, defense, and data communications applications. In recent market activity, the company has seen sustained interest in its products supporting electric vehicle platforms and industrial automation. Performance has tracked demand trends in these areas, with sentiment shaped by stable order books and exposure to long-cycle end markets. Broader technology sector movements have influenced trading patterns, as investors assess the balance between cyclical automotive recovery and growth in high-speed data applications.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers across equities, options, and other instruments, employing varied strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters. Only those demonstrating strong alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent performance metrics, and favorable statistics earn placement in the trending section. Available bots exhibit a wide range of historical win rates, profit factors, and drawdown profiles, allowing users to review detailed statistics before deployment. The section serves as a resource for traders seeking automated approaches tailored to current opportunities. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Amphenol Corporation (APH) and TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) focus primarily on proprietary component design and manufacturing, offering higher gross margins but greater sensitivity to raw material costs and design wins. Celestica Inc. (CLS), by contrast, operates as an electronics manufacturing services provider, emphasizing scale in assembly and supply chain management with potentially lower margins but higher revenue visibility from large contracts. All three maintain significant exposure to AI and data communications, yet CLS has shown more pronounced recent revenue acceleration in that segment. Risk factors differ: APH and TEL carry greater exposure to cyclical automotive and industrial demand, while CLS faces concentration risk in a smaller number of large customers. Valuation multiples across the group respond to earnings growth trajectories and sector rotation, with relative performance often hinging on quarterly guidance and macroeconomic data releases. Market sentiment remains broadly constructive due to structural technology demand, though short-term momentum varies with individual company execution and peer comparisons.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in AI-related revenue, end-market stability, and relative positioning within the connectivity sector, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable risk-adjusted outcomes to Celestica Inc. (CLS). This assessment reflects recent guidance upgrades and revenue momentum in electronics manufacturing, balanced against the diversified but steadier profiles of Amphenol Corporation (APH) and TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL). The verdict remains probabilistic and subject to shifts in market conditions or new data releases.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCLS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and TEL’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- APH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TEL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and TEL’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- CLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TEL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
APH (@Electronic Components) experienced а -0.82% price change this week, while CLS (@Electronic Components) price change was +3.55% , and TEL (@Electronic Components) price fluctuated +2.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.47%.
Reported Earning Dates
APH is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
CLS is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
TEL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (-0.98% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| APH | CLS | TEL | |
| Capitalization | 184B | 36.6B | 60.2B |
| EBITDA | 7.96B | 1.36B | 4.73B |
| Gain YTD | 10.849 | 7.655 | -8.127 |
| P/E Ratio | 42.90 | 38.57 | 20.33 |
| Revenue | 25.9B | 13.8B | 18.7B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 378M | 1.11B |
| Total Debt | 18.7B | 772M | 5.66B |
APH | CLS | TEL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 65 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 73 Overvalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 27 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 19 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 58 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 73 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TEL's Valuation (38) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as APH (70) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CLS (73). This means that TEL's stock grew similarly to APH’s and somewhat faster than CLS’s over the last 12 months.
APH's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CLS (27) and is in the same range as TEL (31). This means that APH's stock grew similarly to CLS’s and similarly to TEL’s over the last 12 months.
CLS's SMR Rating (19) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as APH (26) and is in the same range as TEL (42). This means that CLS's stock grew similarly to APH’s and similarly to TEL’s over the last 12 months.
APH's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TEL (57) and is in the same range as CLS (58). This means that APH's stock grew similarly to TEL’s and similarly to CLS’s over the last 12 months.
APH's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CLS (73) and is somewhat better than the same rating for TEL (94). This means that APH's stock grew similarly to CLS’s and somewhat faster than TEL’s over the last 12 months.
| APH | CLS | TEL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 68% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 69% | 7 days ago 84% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 4 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 44% |
Advertisement
APH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APH has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APH jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APH | 100% | -2.22% | ||
| TEL - APH | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| CLS - APH | 49% Loosely correlated | +4.25% | ||
| BELFA - APH | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| BELFB - APH | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| FN - APH | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||
CLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLS has been closely correlated with FN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLS jumps, then FN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLS | 100% | +4.25% | ||
| FN - CLS | 68% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| TTMI - CLS | 65% Loosely correlated | -5.86% | ||
| GLW - CLS | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.24% | ||
| FLEX - CLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| BHE - CLS | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.81% | ||
More | ||||