Advertisement
BAM or BLK or VCTR
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBLK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and VCTR’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BLK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- VCTR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BLK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and VCTR’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- BLK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- VCTR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.49% price change this week, while BLK (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.22% , and VCTR (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated -2.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +4.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
BLK is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2026.
VCTR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+4.86% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| BAM | BLK | VCTR | |
| Capitalization | 84B | 182B | 7.14B |
| EBITDA | 3.46B | 10.6B | 655M |
| Gain YTD | 1.933 | 10.786 | 86.232 |
| P/E Ratio | 30.06 | 28.10 | 21.09 |
| Revenue | 4.77B | 25.6B | 1.48B |
| Total Cash | 1.1B | 13.1B | N/A |
| Total Debt | 3.83B | 15B | 1.01B |
BAM | BLK | VCTR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 33 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 46 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | 64 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 32 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 43 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VCTR's Valuation (13) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BAM (81) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for BLK (82) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that VCTR's stock grew significantly faster than BAM’s and significantly faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.
VCTR's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (46) in the Investment Managers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for BAM (92) in the null industry. This means that VCTR's stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s and significantly faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.
BAM's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as VCTR (52) in the Investment Managers industry, and is in the same range as BLK (64) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM's stock grew similarly to VCTR’s and similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.
BLK's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as VCTR (37) in the Investment Managers industry, and is in the same range as BAM (47) in the null industry. This means that BLK's stock grew similarly to VCTR’s and similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.
VCTR's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (43) in the Investment Managers industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (81) in the null industry. This means that VCTR's stock grew similarly to BLK’s and somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.
| BAM | BLK | VCTR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 66% | N/A | 6 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 67% |
Advertisement
BAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
VCTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VCTR has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VCTR jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VCTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VCTR | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| APAM - VCTR | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| BEN - VCTR | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| OWL - VCTR | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| BLK - VCTR | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| VRTS - VCTR | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
More | ||||