BAM
Price
$52.49
Change
-$0.68 (-1.28%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
83.41B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BLK
Price
$1136.39
Change
+$7.09 (+0.63%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
175.99B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VCTR
Price
$108.16
Change
+$1.37 (+1.28%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
6.65B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM or BLK or VCTR

BAM vs BLK vs VCTR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) vs. BlackRock (BLK) vs. Victory Capital Holdings (VCTR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BAM, BLK, and VCTR represent asset managers of varying scale, with BLK as the largest by assets under management (AUM) and VCTR demonstrating the strongest recent total returns.
  • Recent market activity shows VCTR with substantial year-to-date gains exceeding 58%, outpacing broader benchmarks while BAM trades near $48 with a dividend yield above 4%.
  • BLK benefits from its dominant position in index and exchange-traded fund (ETF) products, providing relative stability amid fluctuating equity markets.
  • BAM focuses on alternative assets including infrastructure, supporting fee-related earnings growth reported in recent quarters.
  • Valuation sensitivity differs, with smaller firms like VCTR showing higher price volatility tied to performance fees and AUM flows.
  • Overall sector exposure centers on asset management, where AUM growth, fee margins, and market sentiment drive relative performance across the three.

Introduction

Asset management firms play a central role in global capital markets by overseeing trillions in client assets and generating revenue primarily through management and performance fees. This comparison examines BAM (Brookfield Asset Management), BLK (BlackRock), and VCTR (Victory Capital Holdings) to highlight differences in scale, business focus, and recent stock behavior. Professional investors, portfolio managers, and active traders seeking exposure to the financial services sector may find this analysis useful for evaluating relative positioning within the asset management industry.

BAM Overview and Recent Performance

Brookfield Asset Management specializes in alternative investments, including infrastructure, real estate, and private equity. The firm reported strong fundraising momentum in recent quarters, with fee-related earnings showing year-over-year growth. In recent market activity, BAM shares have traded around the $48 level, supported by a forward dividend yield near 4.15%. Broader sentiment has been influenced by continued interest in alternative assets amid shifting interest rate expectations, contributing to steady but measured price behavior over recent weeks.

BLK Overview and Recent Performance

BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager, with significant scale in index funds, ETFs, and active strategies. Its business model emphasizes diversified AUM across equities, fixed income, and multi-asset solutions. Recent market activity for BLK has reflected resilience tied to ETF inflows and overall equity market participation. Stock performance has remained relatively stable compared with smaller peers, as investors weigh the firm’s market leadership against broader sector dynamics in recent weeks.

VCTR Overview and Recent Performance

Victory Capital Holdings operates as a diversified asset manager with strategies spanning traditional and alternative asset classes. The firm has reported record quarterly results in recent periods, driven by AUM growth and strong investment performance. In recent market activity, VCTR shares have shown notable strength, with year-to-date returns exceeding 58% and one-year returns near 48%, outpacing major benchmarks. Sentiment has benefited from operational momentum and favorable AUM trends observed over recent weeks.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of historical win rates, average returns, and drawdown profiles, allowing users to compare metrics such as profitability, trade frequency, and risk-adjusted performance. The section provides an informational resource for exploring automated trading options suited to current conditions. Trending AI Robots

Head-to-Head Comparison

BAM, BLK, and VCTR differ markedly in scale and focus. BLK leads in AUM size and benefits from ETF-driven stability, while BAM emphasizes alternatives that can deliver resilient fee income. VCTR offers higher growth potential through concentrated performance but carries greater volatility linked to AUM flows and market sentiment. Growth drivers include organic inflows for all three, with BAM and VCTR showing recent fundraising or earnings momentum. Risk factors center on fee compression and equity market sensitivity, though BLK’s diversification provides relative insulation. Valuation metrics vary, with dividend focus at BAM contrasting growth-oriented multiples at VCTR.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, AUM momentum, and relative returns in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to VCTR. Its stronger recent performance metrics and operational results position it favorably compared with peers, though outcomes remain subject to market conditions and sector dynamics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2026
Stock price -- (BAM: $52.49BLK: $1136.39VCTR: $108.16)
Brand notoriety: BAM, BLK and VCTR are all not notable
The three companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 93%, BLK: 72%, VCTR: 75%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $83.39B, BLK: $175.99B, VCTR: $6.65B
$BAM is valued at $83.39B, while BLK has a market capitalization of $175.99B, and VCTR's market capitalization is $6.65B. The market cap for tickers in this @Investment Managers ranges from $175.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Investment Managers industry is $9.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBLK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and VCTR’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BLK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VCTR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, VCTR is a better buy in the long-term than BAM, which in turn is a better option than BLK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BLK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and VCTR’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BLK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VCTR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the short-term than BAM, which in turn is a better option than VCTR.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +8.45% price change this week, while BLK (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.22% , and VCTR (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +9.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +5.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLK is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2026.

VCTR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+5.92% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLK($176B) has a higher market cap than BAM($83.4B) and VCTR($6.65B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than BLK and VCTR: BAM (29.99) vs BLK (27.23) and VCTR (19.67). VCTR YTD gains are higher at: 71.446 vs. BLK (6.694) and BAM (3.609). BLK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.6B vs. BAM (3.46B) and VCTR (655M). BLK has more cash in the bank: 13.1B vs. BAM (1.1B) and VCTR (). VCTR has less debt than BAM and BLK: VCTR (1.01B) vs BAM (3.83B) and BLK (15B). BLK has higher revenues than BAM and VCTR: BLK (25.6B) vs BAM (4.77B) and VCTR (1.48B).
BAMBLKVCTR
Capitalization83.4B176B6.65B
EBITDA3.46B10.6B655M
Gain YTD3.6096.69471.446
P/E Ratio29.9927.2319.67
Revenue4.77B25.6B1.48B
Total Cash1.1B13.1BN/A
Total Debt3.83B15B1.01B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs BLK vs VCTR: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
BLK
VCTR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
382239
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91544
SMR RATING
1..100
326653
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
473337
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
825025
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VCTR's Valuation (13) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (15) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (73) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that VCTR's stock grew similarly to BAM’s and somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.

VCTR's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (54) in the Investment Managers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for BAM (91) in the null industry. This means that VCTR's stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s and significantly faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as VCTR (53) in the Investment Managers industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (66) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM's stock grew similarly to VCTR’s and somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as VCTR (37) in the Investment Managers industry, and is in the same range as BAM (47) in the null industry. This means that BLK's stock grew similarly to VCTR’s and similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

VCTR's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (50) in the Investment Managers industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (82) in the null industry. This means that VCTR's stock grew similarly to BLK’s and somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMBLKVCTR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VCTR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
METIS.X2.4538660.001848
+0.08%
Metis cryptocurrency
UTK.X0.0079430.000001
+0.01%
Utrust cryptocurrency
TROY.X0.000003N/A
N/A
TROY cryptocurrency
ZIL.X0.002606-0.000016
-0.63%
Zilliqa cryptocurrency
JUP.X0.180287-0.008233
-4.37%
Jupiter cryptocurrency

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
+1.03%
BN - BAM
85%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
KKR - BAM
74%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
ARES - BAM
71%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
BX - BAM
71%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
CG - BAM
70%
Closely correlated
-1.93%
More

BLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLK
1D Price
Change %
BLK100%
-0.38%
IVZ - BLK
69%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
KKR - BLK
67%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
BX - BLK
67%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
BAM - BLK
66%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
CG - BLK
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
More

VCTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VCTR has been loosely correlated with BEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VCTR jumps, then BEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VCTR
1D Price
Change %
VCTR100%
+6.82%
BEN - VCTR
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
APAM - VCTR
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
OWL - VCTR
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
KKR - VCTR
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
APO - VCTR
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
More