Advertisement
BBWI or FND or RH
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Bath & Body Works (BBWI) vs. Floor & Decor Holdings (FND) vs. RH (RH) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- BBWI trades at a low forward P/E ratio of approximately 6x, reflecting undervaluation amid stable recent performance and a 4% dividend yield, outperforming peers year-to-date.
- FND faces headwinds from declining comparable store sales and cautious consumer spending on big-ticket items, with shares down 15% YTD and recent earnings misses.
- RH shows volatility in the luxury segment, with shares down 25% YTD despite some monthly gains, pressured by softer demand and earnings shortfalls.
- All three operate in consumer discretionary spaces sensitive to economic cycles, but BBWI's essential personal care focus provides relative resilience compared to home improvement and luxury furnishings.
- Recent market activity highlights BBWI's momentum with weekly gains around 6%, while FND and RH lag amid housing slowdowns.
- Tickeron's AI tools analyze thousands of patterns, favoring consistent trends over high-risk luxury plays in current conditions.
Introduction
This comparison examines BBWI (Bath & Body Works), FND (Floor & Decor Holdings), and RH (RH), three stocks in the consumer discretionary sector with exposure to home-related spending. BBWI focuses on personal care and fragrances, FND on hard-surface flooring, and RH on luxury furnishings. Traders seeking relative performance insights and investors tracking sector rotation amid economic uncertainty will find value here, as these names reflect broader trends in discretionary purchases, housing activity, and consumer sentiment shifts in recent market activity.
BBWI Overview and Recent Performance
BBWI, a leading specialty retailer of personal care and home fragrance products like body lotions, candles, and sanitizers, operates over 1,900 stores in the U.S. and Canada, plus international franchises. In recent weeks, shares have shown resilience, gaining around 5% monthly and 6% over five days, trading near $19.70 with a market cap of about $4 billion. This follows Q4 fiscal 2025 earnings that beat estimates, with adjusted EPS of $2.05 and sales of $2.72 billion, despite a 2% year-over-year decline due to tariff pressures and soft demand. International sales rose 9%, bolstering sentiment. Gross margins contracted slightly to 45.7% from occupancy and tariff costs, but a 4% dividend yield and low P/E of 6x support stability. Consumer rebound in body care and strategic promotions have driven positive momentum, positioning BBWI favorably amid peers.
FND Overview and Recent Performance
FND (Floor & Decor Holdings) is a multi-channel specialty retailer of hard-surface flooring, including tile, wood, laminate, vinyl, and natural stone, plus accessories, serving professionals and homeowners through warehouse stores and e-commerce. With a $5.6 billion market cap and shares around $52, recent performance has been mixed, up 7% weekly but down 15% YTD and 0.3% monthly. Q1 2026 results missed expectations, with EPS of $0.37 versus $0.42 estimated, sales dipping 0.7% to $1.15 billion, and comparable store sales down 3.7% due to weather, cautious big-ticket spending, and a 5.5% transaction drop. Gross margins improved to 44%, aided by pricing discipline, while Pro sales grew 1.4%. A new $400 million buyback signals confidence, but housing market softness and elevated short interest of 11% weigh on sentiment in recent market activity.
RH Overview and Recent Performance
RH, formerly Restoration Hardware, is a luxury home furnishings retailer offering furniture, lighting, textiles, bathware, and decor through galleries, outlets, and digital channels, with segments in RH, Waterworks, and real estate. Shares trade near $134 with a $2.5 billion market cap, up 11% monthly but down 25% YTD and volatile longer-term. Recent quarters showed revenue growth like 4% to $843 million but EPS misses at $1.53 versus $2.21 expected, with adjusted EBITDA margins at 17.7%. Demand pressures in luxury persist amid high interest rates and housing slowdowns, though global expansion and design studios provide upside. High short interest over 35% reflects skepticism, yet weekly gains of 1-2% indicate short-term stabilization. Performance hinges on affluent consumer recovery in recent weeks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of top-performing AI-powered trading bots from its library of over 350 agents that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions—based on real-time signals, risk management, and strategies like trend-following or volatility plays—earn a spot among the 25 featured. Stats highlight impressive ranges: annualized returns from +23% to +285%, win rates of 51-88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profits reaching $48,000 on simulated portfolios. Bots employ diverse styles, from short-term corridor take-profit/stop-loss (e.g., 3%/2%) to multi-agent fundamental analysis, targeting themes like semiconductors, industrials, and data centers. Explore these high-conviction options tailored to current volatility and visit Trending AI Robots for signals that adapt to stocks like BBWI, FND, and RH.
Head-to-Head Comparison
BBWI, FND, and RH span personal care, home improvement, and luxury furnishings, all cyclical but with distinct drivers. BBWI's affordable, recurring purchases yield higher EBITDA ($1.4B) and lower valuation (P/E 6x), contrasting FND's P/E of 28x and RH's 21x amid growth bets. Recent momentum favors BBWI (flat YTD) over FND (-15% YTD) and RH (-25% YTD), tied to housing weakness impacting flooring and luxury. Risks include tariffs for BBWI, transactions drops for FND, and affluence sensitivity for RH. Sector exposure overlaps in home goods, but BBWI shows less beta (volatility). Valuation sensitivity is lowest for BBWI, with dividend appeal, versus growth-oriented peers vulnerable to rate shifts and sentiment.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward BBWI based on superior trend consistency, undervaluation at 6x P/E, dividend stability, and relative YTD outperformance amid consumer resilience. FND and RH trail due to earnings misses, housing exposure, and higher volatility, though catalysts like buybacks or luxury recovery could shift probabilities. This probabilistic edge favors BBWI for near-term positioning in choppy markets.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBWI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and RH’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- BBWI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBWI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FND’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and RH’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BBWI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FND’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
BBWI (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +15.14% price change this week, while FND (@Home Improvement Chains) price change was +1.50% , and RH (@Specialty Stores) price fluctuated -8.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.44%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
BBWI is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.
FND is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
RH is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-0.13% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
@Home Improvement Chains (+2.12% weekly)The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.
| BBWI | FND | RH | |
| Capitalization | 4.13B | 5.41B | 2.56B |
| EBITDA | 1.43B | 509M | 544M |
| Gain YTD | 4.004 | -17.753 | -24.270 |
| P/E Ratio | 5.82 | 27.22 | 26.19 |
| Revenue | 7.25B | 4.68B | 3.44B |
| Total Cash | 820M | 294M | 41.2M |
| Total Debt | 4.71B | 2.01B | 3.97B |
BBWI | FND | RH | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 60 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 65 Fair valued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 100 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 53 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 80 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 22 | n/a | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BBWI's Valuation (8) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FND (65) in the Home Improvement Chains industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for RH (89) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BBWI's stock grew somewhat faster than FND’s and significantly faster than RH’s over the last 12 months.
BBWI's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as FND (100) in the Home Improvement Chains industry, and is in the same range as RH (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BBWI's stock grew similarly to FND’s and similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.
BBWI's SMR Rating (1) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RH (34) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for FND (100) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that BBWI's stock grew somewhat faster than RH’s and significantly faster than FND’s over the last 12 months.
RH's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BBWI (51) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry, and is in the same range as FND (53) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that RH's stock grew similarly to BBWI’s and similarly to FND’s over the last 12 months.
BBWI's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as FND (80) in the Home Improvement Chains industry, and is in the same range as RH (87) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BBWI's stock grew similarly to FND’s and similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.
| BBWI | FND | RH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 1 day ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 79% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 70% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 1 day ago 70% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 21 days ago 69% | 9 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 1 day ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XHYC | 36.80 | N/A | N/A |
| BONDBLOXX ETF TRUST USD HIGH YIELD BOND CONSUMER CYCLICALS S | |||
| IBMT | 25.73 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bd ETF | |||
| JUST | 106.02 | -1.16 | -1.09% |
| Goldman Sachs JUST US Large Cap Eq ETF | |||
| SPYC | 45.30 | -0.65 | -1.41% |
| Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF | |||
| XLRE | 43.97 | -1.13 | -2.51% |
| State Street Real Estate Sel SectSPDRETF | |||
BBWI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBWI has been loosely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBWI jumps, then AN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBWI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBWI | 100% | -2.80% | ||
| AN - BBWI | 56% Loosely correlated | -4.85% | ||
| CPRT - BBWI | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.97% | ||
| FND - BBWI | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.55% | ||
| RH - BBWI | 52% Loosely correlated | -7.65% | ||
| PAG - BBWI | 52% Loosely correlated | -5.22% | ||
More | ||||