BLK
Price
$1077.83
Change
+$11.37 (+1.07%)
Updated
Oct 6, 11:02 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
165.9B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BN
Price
$37.19
Change
+$0.36 (+0.98%)
Updated
Oct 6, 11:03 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
81.03B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IVZ
Price
$30.64
Change
+$0.15 (+0.49%)
Updated
Oct 6, 11:06 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.43B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLK or BN or IVZ

BLK vs BN vs IVZ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLK vs BN vs IVZ: Fundamental Ratings
BLK
BN
IVZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80969
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
606247
SMR RATING
1..100
638792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
497241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
489525
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IVZ's Valuation (13) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (71) and is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (77). This means that IVZ's stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s and somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

IVZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (60) and is in the same range as BN (62). This means that IVZ's stock grew similarly to BLK’s and similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's SMR Rating (63) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (87) and is in the same range as IVZ (92). This means that BLK's stock grew similarly to BN’s and similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

IVZ's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (49) and is in the same range as BN (72). This means that IVZ's stock grew similarly to BLK’s and similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

IVZ's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (48) and is significantly better than the same rating for BN (95). This means that IVZ's stock grew similarly to BLK’s and significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKBNIVZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2026
Stock price -- (BLK: $1066.45, BN: $36.83, IVZ: $30.50)
Brand notoriety: BLK, BN and IVZ are all not notable
The three companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLK: 115%, BN: 160%, IVZ: 86%
Market capitalization -- BLK: $165.9B, BN: $81.03B, IVZ: $13.43B
$BLK is valued at $165.9B, while BN has a market capitalization of $81.03B, and IVZ's market capitalization is $13.43B. The market cap for tickers in this @Investment Managers ranges from $57 to $165.9B. The average market capitalization across the @Investment Managers industry is $8.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while BN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and IVZ’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IVZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IVZ is a better buy in the long-term than BLK, which in turn is a better option than BN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and IVZ’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • IVZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the short-term than BLK, which in turn is a better option than IVZ.

Price Growth

BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.45% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.54% , and IVZ (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +0.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLK is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2026.

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.

IVZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IVZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBI4.470.07
+1.59%
MBIA
CCEP101.470.41
+0.41%
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
SEI74.75-0.18
-0.24%
Solaris Energy Infrastructure Inc
DYAI0.45N/A
-0.39%
Dyadic International
RCAT6.34-0.05
-0.86%
Red Cat Holdings

BLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLK
1D Price
Change %
BLK100%
+0.64%
IVZ - BLK
70%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
BX - BLK
67%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
KKR - BLK
67%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
BAM - BLK
67%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
BN - BLK
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
-0.24%
BAM - BN
85%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
CG - BN
73%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
BX - BN
71%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
KKR - BN
70%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
ARES - BN
70%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
More

IVZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVZ has been closely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVZ jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVZ
1D Price
Change %
IVZ100%
-0.52%
BLK - IVZ
70%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
CG - IVZ
67%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
BEN - IVZ
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
STT - IVZ
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
BN - IVZ
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More