Advertisement
ARES vs BN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ares Management Corporation (ARES) vs. Brookfield Corporation (BN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- ARES manages $644 billion in AUM (assets under management), with record Q1 fundraising of $30 billion, but shares are down YTD amid broader market pressures.
- BN oversees $614 billion in fee-bearing capital, raised $21 billion in Q1, and shows steadier recent momentum with shares up over recent weeks.
- Both firms operate in alternative assets, but ARES focuses on credit and private equity, while BN emphasizes diversified infrastructure and real estate.
- Recent performance: ARES up in recent weeks after earnings miss but strong AUM growth; BN exhibits positive 1-year returns near 52-week highs.
- Volatility higher for ARES (52-week range $95.80-$195.26) versus BN ($37.54-$49.57), reflecting differing risk profiles.
- Tickeron’s AI tools highlight relative strength in financial services sectors where both compete.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines ARES and BN, two leading alternative asset managers navigating a dynamic market environment marked by robust fundraising and interest rate shifts. Both companies cater to institutional and high-net-worth investors through credit, private equity, and real assets strategies. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing assets under management (AUM) growth will find value in understanding their relative performance, sector exposures, and recent catalysts. This analysis draws on verifiable data to illuminate contrasts in business models and market positioning for informed decision-making in today's financial services landscape.
ARES Overview and Recent Performance
ARES, or Ares Management Corporation, is a global alternative asset manager specializing in credit strategies, private equity, real estate, and infrastructure, with over $644 billion in AUM as of Q1 2026. The firm serves institutional investors (80% of AUM) and high-net-worth individuals through more than 35 offices worldwide. Recent market activity has seen ARES shares rebound in recent weeks, up around 18% over the past month amid broader financial sector recovery, though down YTD at approximately -21% versus the S&P 500's gains. Key influences include record Q1 fundraising of $30 billion (up 45% YoY), fee-related earnings (FRE) growth to $464 million, and strategic moves like acquiring a 32.4% stake in Rover Pipeline. Sentiment has been tempered by an earnings miss in Q1 (EPS $1.24 vs. expected $1.33) and private credit market concerns, yet AUM expansion and a raised quarterly dividend to $1.35 underscore operational resilience.
BN Overview and Recent Performance
BN, or Brookfield Corporation, is a multi-asset global investment firm focused on real estate, renewable power, infrastructure, private equity, and credit, with fee-bearing capital reaching $614 billion. Operating through alternative asset management, wealth solutions, and operating businesses, it deploys capital across North America, Europe, and beyond. In recent market activity, BN shares have gained about 10% over the past month, trading near the upper end of their 52-week range, with YTD returns around 2% and 1-year gains near 23%. Drivers include Q1 fundraising of $21 billion (on track for a record year), FRE up 11% to $772 million, and developments like a nuclear power joint venture and legal settlements enhancing its risk-reward profile. Steady institutional accumulation and diversified revenue streams have supported positive sentiment, despite broader economic headwinds.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. Out of over 350 total AI bots, 25 trending ones are highlighted based on real-time analysis of market conditions, featuring annualized returns up to +285%, win rates from 51% to 88%, and profit factors ranging 1.5 to 11.7. These bots employ varied styles like trend trading, multi-agent systems, and risk-managed signals on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, targeting sectors including financial services, semiconductors, energy, and infrastructure. With customizable balances and TP/SL (take-profit/stop-loss) corridors, they offer precision for copy trading. Explore Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots to identify bots suited to current trends in stocks like ARES and BN.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ARES and BN both thrive in alternative investments but diverge in focus: ARES emphasizes direct lending and credit ($407 billion AUM segment), driving fee stability amid high interest rates, while BN leverages broader operating businesses in renewables and infrastructure for growth diversification. Recent momentum favors BN's steadier uptrend versus ARES' volatility, though ARES boasts superior recent fundraising scale. Risk factors include ARES' exposure to private credit scrutiny and higher beta (1.52), contrasted with BN's debt-heavy balance sheet (debt-to-equity 164%). Sector overlap in financial services supports mutual benefits from M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity and capital deployment, but BN's larger market cap ($105 billion vs. $41 billion) aids liquidity. Market sentiment tilts toward BN for stability trade-offs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors BN due to its consistent trend positioning, lower relative volatility, and catalysts like record fundraising and infrastructure exposure amid economic recovery signals. While ARES shows strong AUM growth and rebound potential, BN's diversified stability offers higher probability of outperformance in the near term based on observable momentum and sector tailwinds.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARES is a Hold and BN is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARES’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ARES’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARES’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ARES’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- BN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а -6.05% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
ARES is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
BN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-2.28% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| ARES | BN | ARES / BN | |
| Capitalization | 27.2B | 108B | 25% |
| EBITDA | 2.23B | 33.1B | 7% |
| Gain YTD | -20.250 | -3.514 | 576% |
| P/E Ratio | 58.02 | 86.53 | 67% |
| Revenue | 5.91B | 75.7B | 8% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 14.1B | 264B | 5% |
ARES | BN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 33 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ARES's Valuation (14) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BN (87). This means that ARES’s stock grew significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.
BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (54). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.
BN's SMR Rating (89) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (96). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.
BN's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (52). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (95). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.
| ARES | BN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 78% | 9 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
ARES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARES has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARES jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARES | 100% | -2.66% | ||
| KKR - ARES | 82% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| OWL - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | -3.15% | ||
| BX - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| TPG - ARES | 77% Closely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| APO - ARES | 76% Closely correlated | -1.67% | ||
More | ||||
BN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.