Advertisement
ARES vs BN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ares Management Corporation (ARES) vs. Brookfield Corporation (BN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Ares Management Corporation (ARES) has delivered stronger year-to-date returns compared to Brookfield Corporation (BN), with notable growth in assets under management (AUM).
- Brookfield Corporation (BN) reported robust first-quarter 2026 distributable earnings and executed significant share repurchases amid market volatility.
- Both companies operate as alternative asset managers but differ in focus: ARES emphasizes credit and private equity, while BN spans infrastructure, real estate, and insurance.
- Recent market activity shows ARES benefiting from positive sentiment around fee-paying AUM expansion, whereas BN has navigated broader risk-off pressures with active capital return programs.
- Valuation and momentum contrasts position the two stocks as relevant for investors seeking exposure to alternatives with varying risk profiles and sector tilts.
- Relative performance reflects broader trends in private markets, with both firms maintaining institutional appeal for long-term portfolio allocation.
Introduction
Investors and traders evaluating alternative asset managers often compare Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and Brookfield Corporation (BN) due to their scale, diversified strategies, and exposure to private markets. This analysis examines their business models, recent performance trends, and market positioning to highlight key differences and similarities. The comparison is particularly relevant for portfolio managers, institutional allocators, and individual investors interested in growth-oriented financial stocks within the alternatives sector. It provides context on relative momentum and risk factors without endorsing specific positions.
ARES Overview and Recent Performance
Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is a leading alternative asset manager specializing in credit, private equity, and real assets. In recent weeks, the stock has shown resilience, supported by strong assets under management (AUM) growth to approximately $644 billion in the first quarter, with fee-paying AUM rising 19% year-over-year. Recent market activity reflects positive investor sentiment around capital raising and platform breadth, contributing to outperformance versus broader financial benchmarks in select periods. The company’s next earnings release is scheduled for late July 2026, with analysts monitoring trends in distributable earnings and deployment activity. Overall, ARES has maintained a focus on credit strategies amid evolving interest rate environments.
BN Overview and Recent Performance
Brookfield Corporation (BN) operates as a global alternative asset manager with emphasis on infrastructure, real estate, renewable energy, and insurance. Recent performance has been influenced by first-quarter 2026 results showing distributable earnings of $1.6 billion, alongside ongoing share repurchase activity exceeding $1 billion year-to-date across BN and related entities. The stock has experienced mixed momentum amid broader market volatility, with price levels reflecting a discount to management’s view of intrinsic value. Recent developments include plans for corporate simplification and expansion in insurance platforms. BN continues to leverage its diversified footprint across real assets, positioning it for long-term opportunities in infrastructure and private markets.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent performance metrics, and robust statistical profiles earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many showing win rates between 55% and 75% alongside varying drawdown and return profiles depending on their specific parameters and ticker focus. This diversity allows users to explore options suited to different risk tolerances and market outlooks. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and live signals.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and Brookfield Corporation (BN) both manage substantial alternative assets but pursue distinct strategies. ARES concentrates on credit and private equity, driving growth through fee-paying AUM expansion and targeted capital deployment. In contrast, BN maintains broader exposure across infrastructure and real estate, complemented by insurance and active capital return initiatives such as share buybacks. Recent momentum favors ARES in relative returns, while BN has emphasized stability through earnings resilience and corporate restructuring. Risk factors include interest rate sensitivity for both, with ARES potentially more exposed to credit cycles and BN to real asset valuations. Sector exposure tilts ARES toward private credit markets and BN toward infrastructure and renewables. Market sentiment remains constructive for alternatives overall, though relative positioning depends on macroeconomic developments and investor appetite for leveraged strategies.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in AUM growth, earnings stability, and relative positioning within alternatives, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a probabilistic edge to Ares Management Corporation (ARES) for near-term momentum alignment. Brookfield Corporation (BN) demonstrates strengths in diversification and capital returns that could support longer-term resilience. The assessment remains dynamic and reflects data-driven probabilities rather than certainties.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARES is a StrongBuy and BN is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARES’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ARES’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARES’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ARES’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BN’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.13% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.98%.
Reported Earning Dates
ARES is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
BN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-2.61% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| ARES | BN | ARES / BN | |
| Capitalization | 27.2B | 106B | 26% |
| EBITDA | 2.23B | 33.1B | 7% |
| Gain YTD | -23.703 | -5.197 | 456% |
| P/E Ratio | 55.51 | 85.02 | 65% |
| Revenue | 5.91B | 75.7B | 8% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 14.1B | 264B | 5% |
ARES | BN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ARES's Valuation (13) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BN (87). This means that ARES’s stock grew significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.
BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (58). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.
BN's SMR Rating (89) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (97). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.
BN's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (60). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (97). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.
| ARES | BN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 56% |
Advertisement
ARES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARES has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARES jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARES | 100% | -1.12% | ||
| KKR - ARES | 83% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| OWL - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| BX - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| TPG - ARES | 77% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| APO - ARES | 77% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
More | ||||
BN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.