ARES
Price
$141.25
Change
+$1.02 (+0.73%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
31.85B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BN
Price
$41.69
Change
+$0.32 (+0.77%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
92.97B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARES vs BN

ARES vs BN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 10, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ares Management (ARES) vs. Brookfield (BN) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Ares Management (ARES) specializes in private credit and alternative investments, reporting strong Q2 2026 results with over $36 billion in fundraising inflows and fee-related earnings growth exceeding 20% year over year.
  • Brookfield (BN) operates a diversified platform spanning asset management, infrastructure, real estate, and insurance, with upcoming Q2 2026 earnings scheduled for August 13 and recent activity in energy storage acquisitions and AI-related infrastructure projects.
  • In recent market activity, ARES shares have traded near $137 with a market capitalization of approximately $45 billion, while BN shares have hovered around $44 with a market capitalization near $100 billion.
  • Both companies benefit from demand for alternative assets, though ARES exhibits higher valuation multiples typical of pure-play credit managers, whereas BN offers broader sector exposure and ongoing corporate simplification initiatives.
  • Relative performance in recent weeks reflects sector rotation and earnings positioning, with ARES showing post-earnings resilience and BN trading in a contained range ahead of its report.
  • Market sentiment for both remains constructive amid sustained interest in private markets, though macroeconomic factors such as interest rates continue to influence trading dynamics.

Introduction

Ares Management (ARES) and Brookfield (BN) represent prominent players in the alternative asset management space, each with distinct business models that appeal to investors seeking exposure to private markets. This comparison examines their recent performance, operational focuses, and market positioning to assist portfolio managers, institutional investors, and individual traders evaluating relative opportunities in the financials sector. The analysis draws on verifiable developments from the past several weeks while providing context for longer-term positioning.

Ares Management (ARES) Overview and Recent Performance

Ares Management (ARES) is a leading global alternative asset manager with a primary focus on private credit, private equity, and real assets. In recent weeks, the company reported second-quarter 2026 results that highlighted robust fundraising, including more than $36 billion in inflows, alongside double-digit growth in key metrics such as fee-related earnings. Stock price behavior reflected positive investor response to these results, with shares trading near $137 amid broader market volatility. Sentiment has been supported by continued expansion in private credit strategies, though the stock has experienced fluctuations consistent with sector-wide movements in asset management names.

Brookfield (BN) Overview and Recent Performance

Brookfield (BN) is a diversified alternative asset manager and operator with significant activities in infrastructure, real estate, renewable energy, private equity, and insurance. Recent market activity shows the shares trading in a relatively contained range around $44, reflecting cautious positioning ahead of the scheduled August 13, 2026, second-quarter earnings release. Developments in recent weeks include progress on acquisitions such as battery storage assets and participation in large-scale AI infrastructure initiatives. Broader sentiment remains influenced by the company's ongoing corporate simplification efforts and fundraising momentum across its platforms.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles, with only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions featured in the trending section. Available bots demonstrate a wide range of historical win rates, average returns, and risk metrics, allowing users to explore options tailored to different investment styles. For more details on current trending options, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Ares Management (ARES) operates as a more concentrated private credit and alternatives manager, while Brookfield (BN) maintains a broader, integrated model that includes operating businesses and insurance alongside asset management. Growth drivers for ARES center on credit origination and fundraising scale, whereas BN draws from infrastructure development, asset monetization, and cross-platform synergies. Recent momentum favors ARES following its earnings release, while BN awaits its report amid ongoing deal activity. Risk factors include interest-rate sensitivity for both, with ARES potentially more exposed to credit spreads and BN to execution across diversified holdings. Sector exposure overlaps in alternatives but differs in BN’s heavier infrastructure tilt. Market sentiment for each reflects constructive analyst views, tempered by macroeconomic uncertainty.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as recent trend consistency, earnings delivery, and positioning within the alternatives sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to Ares Management (ARES) due to its demonstrated fundraising momentum and post-earnings stability. Brookfield (BN) presents a balanced profile with upcoming catalysts that could narrow any relative gap, depending on execution and market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ARES vs. BN commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARES is a Hold and BN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (ARES: $141.25 vs. BN: $41.69)
Brand notoriety: ARES and BN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARES: 60% vs. BN: 68%
Market capitalization -- ARES: $31.85B vs. BN: $92.97B
ARES [@Investment Managers] is valued at $31.85B. BN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $92.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARES’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ARES’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARES is a better buy in the long-term than BN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARES’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARES’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ARES and BN are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.92% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARES is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($93B) has a higher market cap than ARES($31.9B). BN has higher P/E ratio than ARES: BN (77.20) vs ARES (64.79). BN YTD gains are higher at: -8.848 vs. ARES (-10.527). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 33.1B vs. ARES (2.23B). ARES has less debt than BN: ARES (14.1B) vs BN (264B). BN has higher revenues than ARES: BN (75.7B) vs ARES (5.91B).
ARESBNARES / BN
Capitalization31.9B93B34%
EBITDA2.23B33.1B7%
Gain YTD-10.527-8.848119%
P/E Ratio64.7977.2084%
Revenue5.91B75.7B8%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt14.1B264B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARES vs BN: Fundamental Ratings
ARES
BN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8929
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5341
SMR RATING
1..100
9687
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4470
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8693
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ARES's Valuation (15) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BN (81). This means that ARES’s stock grew significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (53). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.

BN's SMR Rating (87) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (96). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.

ARES's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (70). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

ARES's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (93). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARESBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARES
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INDI4.150.15
+3.75%
indie Semiconductor
LAZ44.151.38
+3.23%
Lazard
BSET18.900.28
+1.50%
Bassett Furniture Industries
JCTC2.940.04
+1.38%
Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd
NTAP192.27-0.54
-0.28%
NetApp

ARES and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARES has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARES jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARES
1D Price
Change %
ARES100%
+0.73%
KKR - ARES
83%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
BX - ARES
79%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
OWL - ARES
78%
Closely correlated
+2.37%
APO - ARES
78%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
TPG - ARES
77%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
More

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+0.77%
BAM - BN
84%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
CG - BN
73%
Closely correlated
+2.88%
BX - BN
71%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
KKR - BN
71%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
ARES - BN
69%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
More