BN
Price
$44.61
Change
-$0.90 (-1.98%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
99.73B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EQH
Price
$41.91
Change
-$0.02 (-0.05%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
11.8B
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HLNE
Price
$78.09
Change
-$1.91 (-2.39%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
3.41B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BN or EQH or HLNE

Header iconBN vs EQH vs HLNE Comparison
Open Charts BN vs EQH vs HLNEBanner chart's image
BN vs EQH vs HLNE Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Brookfield Corporation (BN) vs. Equitable Holdings (EQH) vs. Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BN exhibits robust long-term growth with fee-bearing capital reaching $614 billion and a 23.31% one-year return, driven by alternative asset management across real estate and infrastructure.
  • EQH reported strong Q1 2026 results with $4.23 billion in revenue and announced a transformational merger with Corebridge Financial, boosting YTD return to 9.98% amid retirement and asset management focus.
  • HLNE leads with 33.38% YTD and 44.36% one-year returns, supported by private markets expansion including new interval funds and senior promotions.
  • Valuation contrasts show HLNE at a trailing P/E of 15.87, more attractive than BN's 96.08, while EQH offers a low forward P/E of 4.59.
  • All three stocks operate in financial services with exposure to asset management, but HLNE shows superior recent momentum in private equity and credit.
  • Dividend yields range from 0.59% for BN to 2.54% forward for EQH, appealing to income-focused investors.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines BN, EQH, and HLNE, three financial services firms with significant exposure to asset management, alternative investments, and retirement solutions. Investors seeking diversified exposure to real assets, private markets, and insurance-linked products may find value in analyzing their relative performance. In the current market environment, characterized by interest rate sensitivity and growth in private credit, these stocks offer insights into sector resilience and growth drivers. Traders monitoring momentum and institutional flows will benefit from understanding their recent trajectories and head-to-head positioning.

BN Overview and Recent Performance

BN, or Brookfield Corporation, is a global alternative asset manager specializing in real estate, renewable power, infrastructure, and private equity. With approximately $105 billion in market capitalization, it deploys capital across premier assets worldwide. Recent market activity has seen BN deliver a 1.89% YTD return and 23.31% over one year, trading around $47 with a beta of 1.85 indicating higher volatility. Sentiment has been influenced by a 7% profit rise tied to fee-bearing capital hitting $614 billion, nuclear venture announcements, and legal settlements like TerraForm, alongside acquisitions such as Air Lease. These developments underscore BN's expansion in high-growth areas like energy transition, supporting steady performance amid broader market fluctuations.

EQH Overview and Recent Performance

EQH, Equitable Holdings, Inc., operates as a diversified financial services provider through segments like Individual Retirement, Asset Management, and Protection Solutions. Headquartered in New York with $12 billion market cap, it focuses on annuities, life insurance, and wealth management for institutional and retail clients. In recent weeks, EQH has posted a 9.98% YTD gain and 14.82% one-year return, with shares near $42.60 and a beta of 1.13 reflecting moderate risk. Key drivers include Q1 2026 results showing $4.23 billion revenue and $621 million net income, plus an all-stock merger with Corebridge Financial expected by year-end to create $1.5 trillion in AUM/A. The acquisition of Stifel Independent Advisors added $9 billion in client assets, enhancing growth prospects in retirement and wealth segments.

HLNE Overview and Recent Performance

HLNE, Hamilton Lane Incorporated, is a private markets investment firm offering solutions in private equity, credit, real estate, and infrastructure to institutional and private wealth investors. With a $4.96 billion market cap, it manages diverse fund types including primaries, secondaries, and evergreens. Recent performance stands out with 33.38% YTD and 44.36% one-year returns, shares at $89, and beta of 1.19. Momentum stems from launching interval funds in private credit and infrastructure, senior promotions, and participation in deals like the Cloyes continuation vehicle and Big Sky Wind stake sale. These moves highlight HLNE's positioning in expanding private markets, fostering positive sentiment amid rising demand for alternatives.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top-performing AI trading bots from a library of over 350, curated based on real-time market suitability and historical edge. These bots employ diverse strategies—from momentum and sector rotation to pattern recognition—across timeframes like 15-minute to daily charts, trading thousands of tickers in areas such as semiconductors, industrials, space infrastructure, and financial services. Standout stats include annualized returns ranging from 23% to 285%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, with top performers like space and volatility bots delivering triple-digit gains. Tailored for varying risk appetites, they provide copy-trading signals via virtual, signal, or brokerage agents. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligned with current conditions and enhance your trading edge.

Head-to-Head Comparison

BN, EQH, and HLNE share financial services roots but diverge in business models: BN emphasizes real assets and infrastructure (P/S 1.48, forward P/E 11.89), EQH targets retirement annuities and insurance (P/B 164.14, forward P/E 4.59), and HLNE focuses on private equity/credit (P/E 15.87, P/S 4.82). Growth drivers include BN's $614B fee capital, EQH's merger synergies, and HLNE's fund launches. Recent momentum favors HLNE (33% YTD), while BN lags YTD but excels longer-term. Risk profiles vary with betas (1.85, 1.13, 1.19), EQH least volatile. Sector exposure ties to rate-sensitive assets under management (AUM), with valuation sensitivity higher for BN's elevated trailing P/E. Market sentiment leans positive on private markets tailwinds for HLNE and M&A catalysts for EQH, versus BN's scale trade-offs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors HLNE due to its trend consistency, with top YTD and one-year returns reflecting strong private markets positioning, new product launches, and attractive valuation at 15.87 trailing P/E. Relative stability (beta 1.19) and catalysts like interval funds enhance its edge over BN's higher volatility and EQH's merger uncertainties, though probabilistic outperformance hinges on sustained AUM growth and market sentiment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 11, 2026
Stock price -- (BN: $44.61EQH: $41.91HLNE: $78.09)
Brand notoriety: BN, EQH and HLNE are all not notable
The three companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 76%, EQH: 124%, HLNE: 99%
Market capitalization -- BN: $99.73B, EQH: $11.8B, HLNE: $3.41B
$BN is valued at $99.73B, while EQH has a market capitalization of $11.8B, and HLNE's market capitalization is $3.41B. The market cap for tickers in this @Investment Managers ranges from $156.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Investment Managers industry is $8.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEQH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and HLNE’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EQH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HLNE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQH is a better buy in the long-term than BN and HLNE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EQH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and HLNE’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EQH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HLNE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQH is a better buy in the short-term than HLNE, which in turn is a better option than BN.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.66% price change this week, while EQH (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.17% , and HLNE (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated -3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

EQH is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

HLNE is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($99.7B) has a higher market cap than EQH($11.8B) and HLNE($3.41B). BN has higher P/E ratio than EQH and HLNE: BN (87.47) vs EQH (37.88) and HLNE (13.19). BN YTD gains are higher at: -2.615 vs. EQH (-10.790) and HLNE (-41.546). EQH has more cash in the bank: 41.1B vs. BN (19.7B) and HLNE (364M). HLNE has less debt than EQH and BN: HLNE (356M) vs EQH (6.93B) and BN (264B). BN has higher revenues than EQH and HLNE: BN (75.7B) vs EQH (11.3B) and HLNE (759M).
BNEQHHLNE
Capitalization99.7B11.8B3.41B
EBITDA33.1BN/A488M
Gain YTD-2.615-10.790-41.546
P/E Ratio87.4737.8813.19
Revenue75.7B11.3B759M
Total Cash19.7B41.1B364M
Total Debt264B6.93B356M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs EQH vs HLNE: Fundamental Ratings
BN
EQH
HLNE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
604125
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2961100
SMR RATING
1..100
9010033
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
505881
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96995
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
853585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQH's Valuation (13) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HLNE (13) in the Investment Managers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for BN (87) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that EQH's stock grew similarly to HLNE’s and significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as EQH (61) in the Financial Conglomerates industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for HLNE (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BN's stock grew similarly to EQH’s and significantly faster than HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

HLNE's SMR Rating (33) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (90) in the Investment Managers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for EQH (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HLNE's stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s and significantly faster than EQH’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as EQH (58) in the Financial Conglomerates industry, and is in the same range as HLNE (81) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BN's stock grew similarly to EQH’s and similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLNE (95) in the Investment Managers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for BN (96) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that EQH's stock grew significantly faster than HLNE’s and significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNEQHHLNE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EQH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HLNE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WLYB43.29N/A
N/A
John Wiley & Sons
XOMAO25.38-0.02
-0.08%
XOMA Corp
MYPS0.56-0.02
-3.04%
PLAYSTUDIOS
ALGN170.50-7.60
-4.27%
Align Technology
FDMT8.72-0.51
-5.53%
4D Molecular Therapeutics

EQH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with CRBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then CRBG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQH
1D Price
Change %
EQH100%
-0.05%
CRBG - EQH
83%
Closely correlated
-1.49%
AIG - EQH
69%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
HIG - EQH
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
PFG - EQH
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
KKR - EQH
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
More