BOTZ
Price
$37.98
Change
-$2.10 (-5.24%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
3.64B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PBD
Price
$20.75
Change
-$1.45 (-6.53%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
232.23M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XT
Price
$80.26
Change
-$3.62 (-4.32%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
4.04B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOTZ or PBD or XT

Header iconBOTZ vs PBD vs XT Comparison
Open Charts BOTZ vs PBD vs XTBanner chart's image
BOTZ vs PBD vs XT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) vs. Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) vs. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT)

Key Takeaways

  • BOTZ offers concentrated exposure to robotics and AI with 62 holdings and top-heavy positioning (top 10 at ~58%), featuring higher expense ratio of 0.68% but strong thematic focus on industrial automation leaders.
  • PBD provides broader clean energy diversification across 111 holdings with quarterly rebalancing and equal-weight tiering, at 0.75% expense ratio, emphasizing utilities and industrials amid energy transition demands.
  • XT delivers the most diversified profile with 199 holdings, lowest expense ratio at 0.46%, and balanced multi-sector exposure to exponential technologies including AI, biotech, and advanced materials.
  • All three are passive thematic ETFs, but XT exhibits superior cost efficiency and lower concentration risk, while BOTZ shows higher volatility tied to tech momentum.
  • Recent months highlight BOTZ and XT benefiting from AI-driven capital flows, contrasting PBD's sensitivity to policy and commodity cycles in clean energy.
  • Liquidity favors larger AUM funds like BOTZ ($3.79B) and XT (~$4B) over PBD ($220M).

Introduction

Investors navigating the intersection of technology and sustainability find BOTZ, PBD, and XT compelling for thematic exposure. BOTZ targets robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) innovation, PBD focuses on global clean energy transition, and XT encompasses broader exponential technologies like AI, genomics, and advanced manufacturing. These ETFs represent varied strategic approaches to high-growth themes: BOTZ offers pure-play AI/robotics concentration, PBD emphasizes renewable innovation amid energy demands, and XT provides diversified access to disruptive tech. Amid surging AI adoption and clean energy mandates, comparing their structures reveals options for targeted versus balanced positioning in evolving market cycles.

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) Overview

The Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) is a passive thematic ETF tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It invests in companies benefiting from robotics and AI adoption, including industrial robotics, automation, non-industrial robots, and autonomous vehicles. BOTZ holds 62 securities with top 10 comprising ~58% of assets: Keyence Corp (9.42%), ABB Ltd (8.83%), Fanuc Corp (8.49%), NVDA (8.37%), Intuitive Surgical (5.91%). Sector allocation tilts to Industrials (44.8%) and Information Technology (34.5%), with Health Care at 9.6%. Expense ratio is 0.68%, AUM stands at $3.79 billion, supporting strong liquidity.

Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) Overview

The Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) passively tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index, focusing on clean energy and conservation innovators. It maintains 111 holdings, rebalanced quarterly, with modified equal-weighting in tiers for diversification. Top holdings include ITM Power (2.18%), Ceres Power (1.89%), LS Electric (1.80%), Doosan Fuel Cell (1.72%), and LS Corp (1.64%), limiting single-stock risk. Sectors emphasize Industrials (48.68%), Utilities (18.45%), and Information Technology (15.89%). Expense ratio is 0.75%, with AUM at $220 million, reflecting niche but targeted exposure in renewables and efficiency tech.

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) Overview

The iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) is a passive fund tracking the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index, capturing developed and emerging market companies creating or using exponential technologies like AI, robotics, and biotech. With 199 holdings, it offers broad diversification; top 10 include Texas Instruments (5.00%), NVDA (4.19%), Analog Devices (4.01%), TSLA (3.82%), MSFT (3.56%). Information Technology leads at 44.42%, followed by Health Care (22.30%) and Industrials (9.50%). Lowest expense ratio at 0.46% enhances cost efficiency, with AUM near $4 billion for robust liquidity.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

Robotics, AI, and exponential technologies thrive on AI infrastructure buildout, with global AI spending projected to hit $500 billion by 2026, driving data center and semiconductor demands. Clean energy faces surging electricity needs from AI hyperscalers, spurring renewables, grids, and storage investments—Big Tech signed 43% of 2024 clean energy PPAs (power purchase agreements). Macro tailwinds include U.S. fiscal incentives like OBBBA for infrastructure, while regulatory shifts prioritize domestic manufacturing in semiconductors and energy tech. Geopolitical tensions accelerate supply chain resilience, boosting capex in AI-adjacent power and robotics. Sector risks involve policy volatility for clean energy and compute shortages for AI, yet capital flows favor innovation amid productivity megatrends.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, BOTZ and XT have shown resilient trends tied to AI momentum, with YTD returns around 14% and 13% respectively, reflecting strength in tech-heavy holdings amid market upcycles. PBD trails due to clean energy's sensitivity to interest rates and policy flux. BOTZ exhibits higher relative volatility from concentration (beta ~1.7), prone to sharper drawdowns in tech corrections, while XT's diversification yields smoother momentum and lower risk-adjusted volatility. PBD's broader holdings mitigate single-name risk but amplify exposure to commodity swings. Structural differences—BOTZ's focus on robotics leaders versus XT's multi-theme balance and PBD's quarterly resets—explain divergences, with all sensitive to macro factors like AI capex and energy policy.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across themes like AI and clean energy. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in real-time.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors XT with moderate probability due to its superior diversification (199 holdings), lowest expense ratio (0.46%), balanced sector exposure, and stable momentum in recent market cycles. While BOTZ excels in pure AI/robotics tilt and PBD in clean energy breadth, XT's risk-adjusted positioning and cost efficiency position it strongest structurally amid thematic volatility.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XT has more net assets: 4.04B vs. BOTZ (3.64B) and PBD (232M). PBD has a higher annual dividend yield than XT and BOTZ: PBD (29.168) vs XT (15.085) and BOTZ (4.830). BOTZ was incepted earlier than PBD and XT: BOTZ (10 years) vs PBD (19 years) and XT (11 years). XT (0.46) has a lower expense ratio than BOTZ (0.68) and PBD (0.75). PBD has a higher turnover XT (43.00) and BOTZ (12.11) vs XT (43.00) and BOTZ (12.11).
BOTZPBDXT
Gain YTD4.83029.16815.085
Net Assets3.64B232M4.04B
Total Expense Ratio0.680.750.46
Turnover12.1149.0043.00
Yield0.591.630.79
Fund Existence10 years19 years11 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOTZPBDXT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMDEX61.73N/A
N/A
Praxis Growth Index I
FARMX21.63N/A
N/A
Fidelity Agricultural Productivity
HDTVX20.99N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson International Div T
PCMSX17.45N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap Value I R6
TRZRX20.27N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Real Assets Z

PBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBD has been loosely correlated with MP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBD jumps, then MP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBD
1D Price
Change %
PBD100%
-6.53%
MP - PBD
60%
Loosely correlated
-9.59%
BLDP - PBD
59%
Loosely correlated
-18.95%
EVGO - PBD
56%
Loosely correlated
-14.66%
SLDP - PBD
55%
Loosely correlated
-11.90%
ACHR - PBD
55%
Loosely correlated
-13.17%
More

XT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XT has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XT jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XT
1D Price
Change %
XT100%
-4.31%
STM - XT
85%
Closely correlated
-9.75%
KEYS - XT
77%
Closely correlated
-3.87%
SEIC - XT
72%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
INTU - XT
69%
Closely correlated
-1.73%
FIVN - XT
67%
Closely correlated
-3.88%
More