Investors navigating the intersection of technology and sustainability find BOTZ, PBD, and XT compelling for thematic exposure. BOTZ targets robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) innovation, PBD focuses on global clean energy transition, and XT encompasses broader exponential technologies like AI, genomics, and advanced manufacturing. These ETFs represent varied strategic approaches to high-growth themes: BOTZ offers pure-play AI/robotics concentration, PBD emphasizes renewable innovation amid energy demands, and XT provides diversified access to disruptive tech. Amid surging AI adoption and clean energy mandates, comparing their structures reveals options for targeted versus balanced positioning in evolving market cycles.
The Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) is a passive thematic ETF tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It invests in companies benefiting from robotics and AI adoption, including industrial robotics, automation, non-industrial robots, and autonomous vehicles. BOTZ holds 62 securities with top 10 comprising ~58% of assets: Keyence Corp (9.42%), ABB Ltd (8.83%), Fanuc Corp (8.49%), NVDA (8.37%), Intuitive Surgical (5.91%). Sector allocation tilts to Industrials (44.8%) and Information Technology (34.5%), with Health Care at 9.6%. Expense ratio is 0.68%, AUM stands at $3.79 billion, supporting strong liquidity.
The Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) passively tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index, focusing on clean energy and conservation innovators. It maintains 111 holdings, rebalanced quarterly, with modified equal-weighting in tiers for diversification. Top holdings include ITM Power (2.18%), Ceres Power (1.89%), LS Electric (1.80%), Doosan Fuel Cell (1.72%), and LS Corp (1.64%), limiting single-stock risk. Sectors emphasize Industrials (48.68%), Utilities (18.45%), and Information Technology (15.89%). Expense ratio is 0.75%, with AUM at $220 million, reflecting niche but targeted exposure in renewables and efficiency tech.
The iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) is a passive fund tracking the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index, capturing developed and emerging market companies creating or using exponential technologies like AI, robotics, and biotech. With 199 holdings, it offers broad diversification; top 10 include Texas Instruments (5.00%), NVDA (4.19%), Analog Devices (4.01%), TSLA (3.82%), MSFT (3.56%). Information Technology leads at 44.42%, followed by Health Care (22.30%) and Industrials (9.50%). Lowest expense ratio at 0.46% enhances cost efficiency, with AUM near $4 billion for robust liquidity.
Robotics, AI, and exponential technologies thrive on AI infrastructure buildout, with global AI spending projected to hit $500 billion by 2026, driving data center and semiconductor demands. Clean energy faces surging electricity needs from AI hyperscalers, spurring renewables, grids, and storage investments—Big Tech signed 43% of 2024 clean energy PPAs (power purchase agreements). Macro tailwinds include U.S. fiscal incentives like OBBBA for infrastructure, while regulatory shifts prioritize domestic manufacturing in semiconductors and energy tech. Geopolitical tensions accelerate supply chain resilience, boosting capex in AI-adjacent power and robotics. Sector risks involve policy volatility for clean energy and compute shortages for AI, yet capital flows favor innovation amid productivity megatrends.
In recent months, BOTZ and XT have shown resilient trends tied to AI momentum, with YTD returns around 14% and 13% respectively, reflecting strength in tech-heavy holdings amid market upcycles. PBD trails due to clean energy's sensitivity to interest rates and policy flux. BOTZ exhibits higher relative volatility from concentration (beta ~1.7), prone to sharper drawdowns in tech corrections, while XT's diversification yields smoother momentum and lower risk-adjusted volatility. PBD's broader holdings mitigate single-name risk but amplify exposure to commodity swings. Structural differences—BOTZ's focus on robotics leaders versus XT's multi-theme balance and PBD's quarterly resets—explain divergences, with all sensitive to macro factors like AI capex and energy policy.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across themes like AI and clean energy. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in real-time.
Tickeron’s AI favors XT with moderate probability due to its superior diversification (199 holdings), lowest expense ratio (0.46%), balanced sector exposure, and stable momentum in recent market cycles. While BOTZ excels in pure AI/robotics tilt and PBD in clean energy breadth, XT's risk-adjusted positioning and cost efficiency position it strongest structurally amid thematic volatility.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| BOTZ | PBD | XT | |
| Gain YTD | 4.830 | 29.168 | 15.085 |
| Net Assets | 3.64B | 232M | 4.04B |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.46 |
| Turnover | 12.11 | 49.00 | 43.00 |
| Yield | 0.59 | 1.63 | 0.79 |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | 11 years |
| BOTZ | PBD | XT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 87% | 9 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% | 19 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBD has been loosely correlated with MP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBD jumps, then MP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PBD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBD | 100% | -6.53% | ||
| MP - PBD | 60% Loosely correlated | -9.59% | ||
| BLDP - PBD | 59% Loosely correlated | -18.95% | ||
| EVGO - PBD | 56% Loosely correlated | -14.66% | ||
| SLDP - PBD | 55% Loosely correlated | -11.90% | ||
| ACHR - PBD | 55% Loosely correlated | -13.17% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XT has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XT jumps, then STM could also see price increases.