Advertisement
BWMN or STN or TTEK
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) vs. Stantec Inc. (STN) vs. Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- BWMN shows strong 1-year return of 40.77% and raised 2026 revenue guidance to $520-540M with record $653M backlog, signaling robust growth in engineering services.
- STN boasts a massive $9.98B market cap and record backlog near $8.6B, supported by steady YTD gains of 8.13% and international infrastructure exposure.
- TTEK leads with attractive trailing P/E of 18.13, $4.28B backlog up 8% sequentially, and raised FY2026 net revenue guidance to $4.25-4.40B amid resilient demand.
- All three firms operate in engineering and consulting, benefiting from infrastructure and sustainability trends, but TTEK offers superior profitability metrics.
- Recent market activity reflects volatility, with BWMN gaining momentum from organic backlog growth while STN and TTEK emphasize scale and margin expansion.
- Relative performance highlights BWMN's high growth potential versus TTEK's valuation stability in the current environment.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines BWMN, STN, and TTEK, three engineering and consulting firms capitalizing on infrastructure, environmental, and sustainability demands. Investors tracking industrials sector relative performance will find value in their shared exposure to government contracts, backlog visibility, and growth drivers like water management and energy transition. Traders focused on recent momentum, valuation sensitivity, and market positioning can assess trade-offs in scale, profitability, and upside potential amid evolving economic conditions.
BWMN Overview and Recent Performance
BWMN, or Bowman Consulting Group Ltd., delivers engineering, technical consulting, and program management services across infrastructure sectors like transportation, energy, and environmental in the U.S. Recent market activity has driven a 40.77% 1-year return, outpacing the S&P 500, with YTD at 5.30%. In Q1 2026, gross contract revenue hit $126.5M, up 12% YoY, and adjusted EBITDA reached $16.8M. Sentiment shifted positively after raising full-year 2026 net revenue guidance to $520-540M—over 20% growth—and reporting a record $653M gross backlog, up 56% YoY, fueled by organic demand and a major U.S. government contract modification. This visibility supports second-half acceleration, though higher P/E of 56.12 reflects growth expectations.
STN Overview and Recent Performance
STN, Stantec Inc., offers professional services in infrastructure, facilities, engineering, architecture, and environmental consulting across North America and internationally. The stock has posted 8.13% YTD and 6.54% over one year, with recent weeks showing resilience amid broader market pressures. Q4 FY25 revenue was $1.64B, with adjusted EPS of $1.25. Backlog hit record levels near $8.6B, up 9.5% YoY including organic and acquisition growth, representing about 13 months of work. Key influences include sustainability-driven revenue (68% of total) and wins in water, transportation, and energy transition projects. Market sentiment remains steady, bolstered by a trailing P/E of 28.38 and TTM revenue of $6.49B, though quarterly earnings growth dipped 4.2% YoY.
TTEK Overview and Recent Performance
TTEK, Tetra Tech, Inc., specializes in consulting and engineering for water, environment, infrastructure, renewable energy, and international development via Government Services Group and Commercial/International segments. Recent performance includes 9.54% YTD and 12.54% 1-year returns. Q2 FY26 net revenue was $1.05B, with adjusted EPS of $0.34 beating estimates; EBITDA margin expanded 90 bps to a record. Backlog grew 8% sequentially to $4.28B, prompting raised FY26 net revenue guidance to $4.25-4.40B and adjusted EPS to $1.50-1.58. Strong cash flow ($165M in Q2) and demand in resilient sectors like water resources have lifted sentiment, underpinned by a favorable trailing P/E of 18.13 and TTM revenue of $4.4B.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, tailored to current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend trading, multi-agent systems, and take-profit/stop-loss (TP/SL) corridors (e.g., 3% TP/2% SL), with trade durations from 1 day to 46 days. Performance stats vary widely: annualized returns from +23.05% to +285.35%, win rates 50.96% to 88.33%, trading 1 to 18 tickers in sectors like semiconductors, industrials, data centers, and gold miners. AI ranks them by adapting to volatility and spotting promising markets, helping traders access proven signals without manual analysis. Explore these bots to enhance strategies in dynamic conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
BWMN, STN, and TTEK share engineering-focused business models but differ in scale and exposure. STN dominates with $9.98B market cap and broadest international footprint, emphasizing architecture and sustainability (68% revenue), while TTEK ($7.86B cap) excels in water/environmental niches with superior margins. Smaller BWMN ($609M cap) targets U.S. infrastructure growth. Growth drivers favor BWMN's 20%+ 2026 outlook versus TTEK's 9% midpoint; recent momentum strongest for BWMN (40% 1-yr). Risks include BWMN's acquisition integration and elevated P/E (56 vs. STN 28, TTEK 18); TTEK shows lowest sector sensitivity via backlog stability. Sentiment tilts toward larger peers' diversification, but BWMN offers higher beta upside.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI leans toward TTEK in the current environment, given its lowest valuation (P/E 18.13), consistent backlog expansion to $4.28B, raised FY2026 guidance, and margin gains amid stable demand. BWMN trails closely with explosive backlog and revenue outlook, but higher risk profile tempers probability; STN provides balance via scale yet lags momentum. Observable trends favor TTEK's relative positioning with 60-70% confidence based on factors like profitability and catalysts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BWMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and TTEK’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- BWMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- STN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TTEK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BWMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and TTEK’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BWMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- STN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TTEK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
BWMN (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +2.89% price change this week, while STN (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -2.21% , and TTEK (@Engineering & Construction) price fluctuated +1.49% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.01%.
Reported Earning Dates
BWMN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
STN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
TTEK is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-0.01% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| BWMN | STN | TTEK | |
| Capitalization | 568M | 8.44B | 7.24B |
| EBITDA | 47M | 1.1B | 698M |
| Gain YTD | -1.757 | -21.704 | -16.459 |
| P/E Ratio | 52.35 | 23.93 | 16.71 |
| Revenue | 504M | 8.14B | 5.13B |
| Total Cash | 12M | 416M | N/A |
| Total Debt | 251M | 2.55B | 1.06B |
STN | TTEK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TTEK's Valuation (38) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as STN (43) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that TTEK’s stock grew similarly to STN’s over the last 12 months.
STN's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as TTEK (81) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that STN’s stock grew similarly to TTEK’s over the last 12 months.
TTEK's SMR Rating (37) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as STN (56) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that TTEK’s stock grew similarly to STN’s over the last 12 months.
TTEK's Price Growth Rating (76) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as STN (81) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that TTEK’s stock grew similarly to STN’s over the last 12 months.
STN's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as TTEK (97) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that STN’s stock grew similarly to TTEK’s over the last 12 months.
| BWMN | STN | TTEK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 13 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 65% | 5 days ago 47% | 10 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
STN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STN has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STN jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STN | 100% | -1.86% | ||
| ACM - STN | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| J - STN | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| TTEK - STN | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| EXPO - STN | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| PWR - STN | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.35% | ||
More | ||||
TTEK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTEK has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTEK jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTEK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTEK | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| ACM - TTEK | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| J - TTEK | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| KBR - TTEK | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| STN - TTEK | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| EXPO - TTEK | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||