Advertisement
LI vs NIO
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Notable companies
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LI is a StrongBuy and NIO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NIO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NIO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- NIO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LI (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -10.04% price change this week, while NIO (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +1.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -4.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.62%.
Reported Earning Dates
LI is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
NIO is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (-4.45% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
| LI | NIO | LI / NIO | |
| Capitalization | 12.4B | 12.3B | 101% |
| EBITDA | -1.92B | -7.54B | 25% |
| Gain YTD | -25.399 | -0.196 | 12,954% |
| P/E Ratio | 99.38 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 109B | 101B | 108% |
| Total Cash | 93.1B | 31.8B | 293% |
| Total Debt | 17.7B | 26.6B | 67% |
NIO | LI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NIO's Valuation (73) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as LI (76) in the null industry. This means that NIO’s stock grew similarly to LI’s over the last 12 months.
NIO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as LI (100) in the null industry. This means that NIO’s stock grew similarly to LI’s over the last 12 months.
LI's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as NIO (100) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that LI’s stock grew similarly to NIO’s over the last 12 months.
NIO's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as LI (83) in the null industry. This means that NIO’s stock grew similarly to LI’s over the last 12 months.
LI's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NIO (100) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that LI’s stock grew significantly faster than NIO’s over the last 12 months.
| LI | NIO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 22 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
LI and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LI has been loosely correlated with NIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LI jumps, then NIO could also see price increases.
NIO and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIO has been loosely correlated with XPEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NIO jumps, then XPEV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIO | 100% | +0.79% | ||
| XPEV - NIO | 53% Loosely correlated | -4.42% | ||
| LI - NIO | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| GP - NIO | 29% Poorly correlated | +3.28% | ||
| WKHS - NIO | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
| CENN - NIO | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.03% | ||
More | ||||