CHAT
Price
$95.33
Change
-$1.04 (-1.08%)
Updated
Jun 24, 03:28 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.25B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FTEC
Price
$274.16
Change
-$2.87 (-1.04%)
Updated
Jun 24, 03:44 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
21.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PSI
Price
$166.53
Change
-$3.91 (-2.29%)
Updated
Jun 24, 03:40 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.01B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHAT or FTEC or PSI

CHAT vs FTEC vs PSI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) vs. Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) vs. Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI)

Key Takeaways

  • CHAT offers actively managed, thematic exposure to generative AI with 42 holdings and a higher expense ratio of 0.75%, contrasting FTEC's low-cost (0.08%) passive broad tech indexing across 286 holdings.
  • FTEC provides comprehensive U.S. information technology sector diversification, heavily weighted toward mega-caps like NVDA and AAPL, ideal for cost-efficient broad exposure.
  • PSI employs a smart beta strategy targeting 30-31 U.S. semiconductor firms via the Dynamic Semiconductor Intellidex Index, with a 0.56% expense ratio and higher concentration risk.
  • All three exhibit elevated volatility due to tech sensitivity, but CHAT and PSI show greater swings from their AI and semiconductor tilts compared to FTEC's stability.
  • Recent months favor narrower AI/semiconductor plays amid capital flows to AI infrastructure, though FTEC offers superior diversification and liquidity.
  • Cost efficiency and holding count favor FTEC for long-term positioning, while CHAT and PSI suit thematic conviction.

Introduction

Comparing Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT), Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC), and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) highlights diverse approaches to the booming technology sector, particularly amid surging AI demand. CHAT provides active, thematic focus on generative AI innovators globally. FTEC delivers passive, broad exposure to the U.S. information technology sector via market-cap weighting. PSI uses a quantitative smart beta model for U.S. semiconductors. These ETFs represent tiered strategies—from concentrated thematic bets to diversified sector plays—relevant as AI infrastructure drives capital flows, yet macro uncertainties loom.

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) Overview

The Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) is an actively managed thematic ETF seeking long-term capital appreciation by investing in companies driving generative AI across platforms, infrastructure, enterprise software, and consumer applications. It holds 42 equities globally, with top holdings including NVDA (6.85%), GOOGL (6.49%), AMD (5.78%), Micron Technology (MU, 5.63%), and AMZN (3.80%). Sector tilt emphasizes technology (around 73%) and communication services (19%). The expense ratio is 0.75%, with AUM at $1.63 billion since inception in May 2023. Distinguishing as the first generative AI ETF, it relies on active security selection without a fixed index.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) Overview

The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is a passive ETF tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, representing U.S. tech sector performance across market caps. It features 286 holdings, with top weights in NVDA (18.83%), AAPL (14.29%), MSFT (9.91%), Broadcom (AVGO, 4.86%), and MU (2.64%). Nearly 100% allocated to technology, it maintains a low 0.08% expense ratio and AUM exceeding $19 billion since October 2013. Key strengths include broad diversification, low turnover (around 9%), and high liquidity, using representative sampling for efficient indexing.

Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) Overview

The Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI), formerly known as Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETF, tracks the Dynamic Semiconductor Intellidex Index, selecting 30-31 U.S. semiconductor stocks via quantitative criteria like price momentum, earnings, and value. Top holdings feature MaxLinear (MXL, ~8-9%), AMD (~6-7%), MU (~5%), Texas Instruments (TXN, ~4.5%), and AVGO (~4.4%). Over 97% in technology, it has a 0.56% expense ratio, AUM around $2.3 billion, and quarterly rebalancing since June 2005. As a non-diversified smart beta fund, it aims to outperform traditional cap-weighted peers through factor-based weighting.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The technology sector, especially AI and semiconductors, thrives amid explosive demand for generative AI infrastructure. Global semiconductor sales are projected to hit $975 billion in 2026, with AI chips nearing $500 billion, driven by hyperscaler capex exceeding $600 billion. Capital flows heavily into data centers, high-bandwidth memory (HBM), and advanced packaging, boosting earnings for key holdings like NVDA and AMD. Macro drivers include AI productivity gains and U.S. CHIPS Act subsidies, but risks encompass geopolitical tensions (e.g., Taiwan), supply chain bottlenecks, inflation, and trade restrictions. Regulatory scrutiny on AI ethics and energy demands adds volatility to sector cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, CHAT has led with strong gains from its AI focus, posting around 27% one-month and 46% YTD returns, though with higher volatility (~9%) and drawdowns from thematic concentration. PSI, leveraging semiconductor momentum, has shown robust uptrends but amplified swings (beta ~2.2), outperforming broader tech in AI-driven cycles. FTEC delivers consistent trend strength (~22% one-month, 20% YTD) with lower volatility (~6%) and shallower drawdowns, thanks to mega-cap buffers like AAPL. Differences stem from CHAT's active AI bets and PSI's narrow sector tilt versus FTEC's diversification, with all sensitive to interest rates and AI hype cycles.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors FTEC for its superior cost efficiency (0.08% expense ratio), extensive diversification (286 holdings), stable momentum, and risk-adjusted positioning in recent market cycles. While CHAT and PSI exhibit stronger short-term upside from AI/semiconductor themes, FTEC's broad exposure mitigates concentration risks with ~70% probability of relative outperformance over 12 months on a structural basis.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTEC has more net assets: 21.1B vs. PSI (3.02B) and CHAT (2.25B). PSI has a higher annual dividend yield than CHAT and FTEC: PSI (116.150) vs CHAT (63.450) and FTEC (23.560). CHAT was incepted earlier than FTEC and PSI: CHAT (3 years) vs FTEC (13 years) and PSI (21 years). FTEC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than PSI (0.56) and CHAT (0.75). PSI has a higher turnover CHAT (32.00) and FTEC (9.00) vs CHAT (32.00) and FTEC (9.00).
CHATFTECPSI
Gain YTD63.45023.560116.150
Net Assets2.25B21.1B3.02B
Total Expense Ratio0.750.080.56
Turnover32.009.0078.00
Yield1.720.330.05
Fund Existence3 years13 years21 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHATFTECPSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTEC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUMV42.710.08
+0.19%
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
GXLC91.20N/A
N/A
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
SPXE79.49-1.09
-1.35%
ProShares S&P 500® ex-Energy
TSPY25.20-0.35
-1.37%
TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Inc ETF
FV72.43-1.55
-2.10%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF

CHAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHAT has been closely correlated with MU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHAT jumps, then MU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHAT
1D Price
Change %
CHAT100%
-7.40%
MU - CHAT
69%
Closely correlated
-13.18%
AMD - CHAT
66%
Closely correlated
-5.76%
NVDA - CHAT
66%
Closely correlated
-4.13%
ARM - CHAT
66%
Closely correlated
-10.14%
AVGO - CHAT
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.06%
More

PSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSI has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSI jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSI
1D Price
Change %
PSI100%
-7.60%
LRCX - PSI
86%
Closely correlated
-9.33%
TER - PSI
84%
Closely correlated
-8.07%
SYNA - PSI
83%
Closely correlated
-6.52%
AMAT - PSI
83%
Closely correlated
-8.48%
KLAC - PSI
83%
Closely correlated
-9.17%
More