CL
Price
$83.08
Change
-$0.45 (-0.54%)
Updated
Apr 21, 11:02 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
67.02B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KVUE
Price
$17.53
Change
-$0.05 (-0.28%)
Updated
Apr 21, 11:12 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
33.75B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STZ
Price
$159.53
Change
-$0.28 (-0.18%)
Updated
Apr 21, 11:22 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
27.71B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CL or KVUE or STZ

Header iconCL vs KVUE vs STZ Comparison
Open Charts CL vs KVUE vs STZBanner chart's image
CL vs KVUE vs STZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Kenvue (KVUE) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CL leads YTD performance at nearly 12%, supported by strong Q4 earnings and a dividend increase, outperforming the S&P 500.
  • KVUE trades 28.7% below its 52-week high despite Q4 beats, with analysts holding a neutral outlook amid operational innovations.
  • STZ shows resilience in premium beer brands but faces softer demand and leadership transition, with YTD gains of 8.21%.
  • CL boasts the highest market cap at ~$71B and robust revenue growth, positioning it as the most stable in recent market activity.
  • All three exhibit defensive qualities in consumer staples, but CL's trend consistency and lower relative volatility favor it in AI assessments.
  • Valuations vary, with STZ at a forward P/E discount, while KVUE appears undervalued post-earnings.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines CL (Colgate-Palmolive), KVUE (Kenvue), and STZ (Constellation Brands), three consumer-focused companies spanning oral care, personal health, and beverages. These defensive plays appeal to investors seeking stability amid market volatility, as they benefit from essential demand. Traders may value their relative performance for sector rotation, while long-term holders appreciate dividend reliability and growth catalysts. Recent earnings and strategic updates provide fresh insights into their market positioning, aiding decisions on relative strength in the current environment.

CL Overview and Recent Performance

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) is a global leader in oral care, personal care, home care, and pet nutrition, with brands like Colgate toothpaste and Hill’s pet food driving ~$20.4B in TTM revenue. In recent market activity, CL shares have demonstrated resilience, posting a YTD return of nearly 12% versus the S&P 500's 2.53%. The stock trades around $88, within a 52-week range of $74.55–$99.33, reflecting a market cap of ~$71B. Q4 FY25 results showed revenue of $5.23B (up 5.8% YoY) and EPS of $0.95 (beating estimates by 4.2%), bolstered by premium oral care and pet nutrition growth. A recent dividend increase and 2030 growth plan announcements have supported sentiment, though broader geopolitical tensions and oil price volatility pose headwinds. Analysts maintain mixed views, with Barclays raising its price target to $88.

KVUE Overview and Recent Performance

Kenvue (KVUE), the world's largest pure-play consumer health firm, focuses on self-care, skin health, and essential health via brands like Tylenol, Neutrogena, and Listerine, generating ~$15.5B in 2024 net sales. Recently, KVUE shares hover near $17.39, down 28.7% from the 52-week high of $25.17 (range: $14.02–$25.17), with a ~$33B market cap. YTD return stands at 1.97%, lagging the S&P, while 1-year performance is mixed at 21.37%. Q4 2025 revenue hit $3.78B (up 3.2% YoY, beating estimates), with EPS of $0.27 exceeding forecasts. Operational innovations and a potential Kimberly-Clark acquisition influence sentiment, earning a 'Hold' consensus. Price target hikes, like UBS to $19, signal cautious optimism amid efficiency drives.

STZ Overview and Recent Performance

Constellation Brands (STZ) produces and markets premium beer, wine, and spirits, anchored by Corona and Modelo, with operations in the U.S., Mexico, and beyond, yielding ~$9.4B TTM revenue. In recent weeks, STZ trades around $148, in a 52-week range of $126–$197, with a ~$26B market cap. YTD return of 8.21% beats the S&P, but 1-year at 17.23% trails slightly. Q3 FY26 revenue was $2.22B, with EPS TTM at $6.36. A CEO transition to Nicholas Fink and focus on core premium brands like Pacifico address softer beer demand tied to economic pressures on Hispanic consumers. Barclays' Equal-Weight rating persists, with an average target of $171, highlighting valuation appeal despite demand challenges.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the platform's top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, each trading thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles like technical/fundamental analysis on stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only those excelling in current conditions—such as high volatility or sector rotations—earn a spot, with audited stats including annualized returns up to 216%, win rates of 53–95%, and profit factors reaching 25+. Examples span semiconductors (e.g., SOXL bots at 70–93% win rates), energy/oil, aerospace, and consumer sectors. These bots offer risk-managed signals for copy trading, appealing to traders seeking data-driven edges. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify suitable options for today’s market.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CL, KVUE, and STZ operate in consumer staples but diverge in models: CL's diversified essentials yield steady volume, KVUE's health focus ties to wellness trends, and STZ's premium alcohol bets on aspirational spending. Growth drivers include CL's pet nutrition (25–30% sales), KVUE's OTC innovation, and STZ's imported beer dominance. Recent momentum favors CL (12% YTD), with STZ close; KVUE lags. Risks: STZ faces cyclical demand, KVUE post-spin hurdles, CL commodity exposure. STZ's forward P/E (~12) undercuts peers (~23–34), but CL leads sentiment via earnings beats.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors CL due to superior trend consistency, YTD outperformance, and stable catalysts like dividend growth and earnings reliability. Its defensive positioning and lower relative drawdowns in volatile conditions enhance probabilistic appeal over KVUE's undervaluation potential or STZ's premium recovery outlook.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (CL: $83.53KVUE: $17.58STZ: $159.82)
Brand notoriety: CL and STZ are notable and KVUE is not notable
CL and KVUE are part of the Household/Personal Care industry, and STZ is in the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CL: 84%, KVUE: 75%, STZ: 103%
Market capitalization -- CL: $67.02B, KVUE: $33.75B, STZ: $27.71B
$CL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $67.02B. $KVUE’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $ $33.75B. $STZ [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] has a market capitalization of $ $27.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $ $335.79B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $ $147.49B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $ $19.91B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry is $ $25.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKVUE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and STZ’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KVUE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CL is a better buy in the long-term than KVUE and STZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KVUE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and STZ’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KVUE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KVUE and STZ are a better buy in the short-term than CL.

Price Growth

CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while KVUE (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +1.85% , and STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price fluctuated -2.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.17%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.

KVUE is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2026.

STZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 08, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.33% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (-0.22% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CL($67B) has a higher market cap than KVUE($33.8B) and STZ($27.7B). CL has higher P/E ratio than KVUE and STZ: CL (31.76) vs KVUE (23.13) and STZ (16.63). STZ YTD gains are higher at: 16.599 vs. CL (7.016) and KVUE (3.081). CL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.96B vs. KVUE (2.99B) and STZ (2.47B). CL and KVUE has less debt than STZ: CL (8.55B) and KVUE (8.67B) vs STZ (10.7B). CL has higher revenues than KVUE and STZ: CL (20.4B) vs KVUE (15.1B) and STZ (9.38B).
CLKVUESTZ
Capitalization67B33.8B27.7B
EBITDA3.96B2.99B2.47B
Gain YTD7.0163.08116.599
P/E Ratio31.7623.1316.63
Revenue20.4B15.1B9.38B
Total CashN/A1.06B152M
Total Debt8.55B8.67B10.7B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CL vs STZ: Fundamental Ratings
CL
STZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1060
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70100
SMR RATING
1..100
555
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4681
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STZ's Valuation (41) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that STZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.

CL's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as STZ (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

CL's SMR Rating (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that CL’s stock grew somewhat faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.

STZ's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (57) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that STZ’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.

CL's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (81) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that CL’s stock grew somewhat faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLKVUESTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KVUE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XSW155.802.14
+1.39%
State StreetSPDRS&PSftwr&SvcsETF
EQIN50.430.11
+0.22%
Columbia US Equity Income ETF
SHM48.000.01
+0.02%
Stt Strt® SPDR® Nuveen ICE S/T MuncplETF
GLV6.11N/A
-0.08%
Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund
JGRW26.45-0.16
-0.61%
Jensen Quality Growth ETF

KVUE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KVUE has been loosely correlated with KMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KVUE jumps, then KMB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KVUE
1D Price
Change %
KVUE100%
-0.17%
KMB - KVUE
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
CL - KVUE
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
PG - KVUE
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
UL - KVUE
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
CLX - KVUE
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
More

STZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with SAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then SAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STZ
1D Price
Change %
STZ100%
-1.52%
SAM - STZ
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
DEO - STZ
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
TAP - STZ
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
MGPI - STZ
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
BUD - STZ
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
More